Thanks Jonathan for your ideas here - they're the most detailed ones so
far! The animation bit I'm struggling to understand though…
So, to help clarify, my idea, which is only a rough idea and needs working
is something like the following case for the user logging in:
- The user hits enter
I'm interested in how this works. With my idea, the important thing is that
something is done to cover transition. The only reason I still think my
idea is more relevant is because my own idea isn't an animation for the
sake of an animation. Mine was meant to convey an idea as much as being a
I was greeted by a small surprise today in updating my Precise machines: a
new version of Ubuntu One controls that is made using Qt. All well enough,
as it can make it much easier to share code with the Windows version of the
app... But there are still some consequences.
First of all, this brings
You're right that the vanilla isn't very good. But does that somehow mean
that we can't make it better? Just because those examples are bad, doesn't
preclude the possibility.
Now, don't put words in my mouth: I didn't say make TDF make a GTK version
of LibreOffice. I did say there was room for
Ubuntu isn't about choice though. One of Ubuntu's foundational
principles was that it would be a Linux distribution where the
developers make the intelligent, informed decisions so people don't
have to answer 20 questions just to use it. For instance, only one web
browser is installed by
This is a mailing list about Unity's design, please reign it in.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
joerlend.schins...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24. feb. 2012 02:20, cmaglothin wrote:
He didn't say take them out of the market, I think he meant take them out
of the suggested
While I'm sure that is the intent, no, Qt doesn't look 100% native. It
looks MOSTLY right, but it is still off. Things like the buttons looking
slightly different, randomly using bold for button text, still using GTK 2
(just nitpicking there, I'm sure that's being worked on).
And that's partly
I'd like to point out that the new key combination presents quite an
annoying behavior as well: Whenever I test super+shift+arrow, if I delay
a little too long, the shortcuts overlay pops up and obscures my view of
the content. And If I'm just trying to check what's on that desktop, that's
a
Why would you stretch them out ?
in every type of quicklist is *truncated*:
And, if they are truncated, they run the risk of losing all inherent value.
Also, you need to define how long is too long while considering the font
size on Ubuntu Quicklists is larger than 7's so we can't have as
I'll volunteer to help in whatever way I can.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design
Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
I think this raises a more important issue: If an indicator remains miss
able (as I believe it was said messaging menu suffers from as well) does
this mean we're doing indicators wrong or is it down to learned behaviors
working against users?
In other words why aren't indicators indicating?
I
Someone asked me to get some info to them about Nautilus' menu when right
clicking an image file, this is what I was confronted with:
Open with Image Viewer
---
Open With
---
Cut
Copy
---
Make Link
Rename...
Copy
Sent it along to Nautilus' list. Still no reply over whether they will even
accept it.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 24 June 2012 03:35, Jonathan Meek shrouded.cl...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone asked me to get some info to them about Nautilus' menu
Aviv, I'm sorry to hear that, but this list is not the place for such
mails. You might try your hand on Ask Ubuntu and see what help they may
give you.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Aviv aviv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I was using Ubuntu 11.10 up untill recently. It worked fine. I
If we were to do this, the title would need be moved over so the menu
doesn't overlap the launcher. Then something needs to go into that corner.
Window controls would be a bit confusing when not connected to any specific
application visually. Moving the menu into the app is a no go because HUD
suggestions to make it a bit less of a
mess? What about with regard to the topic of this thread, any interesting
ideas for fitting into the sound menu more scalably?
Alex
On Jan 9, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Jonathan Meek shrouded.cl...@gmail.com
wrote:
A bit late, but I would like to add my own thoughts
Oh, yay, this discussion again. It's been done to death many times over.
The horse is no longer recognizable.
Let's go point by point, shall we?
1. Usability
Yep. Discoverability takes a hit. We know.
2. Ergonomics
If you're using focus follows mouse and don't already know about it? Sure.
I would file a bug against the light-themes on launchpad. Design can take a
look at it from there and decide what to do. This is one of the most
critical times to file such a bug with the next LTS around the corner
(Which is shaping up to be quite the treat even if I'm much more interested
in
18 matches
Mail list logo
