[Bug 612566] [NEW] edit-patch doesn't have a non-interactive mode

2010-08-02 Thread Benjamin Drung
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools edit-patch doesn't have a non-interactive mode. This makes it hard to use in scripts like sponsor-patch. ** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- edit-patch doesn't have a

[Bug 365147] Re: suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats

2010-08-02 Thread Benjamin Drung
I wrote suspicious-source from scratch. Can you please test the new one and report, which mimetype should be whitelisted? You can get the source by running bzr branch lp:ubuntu-dev-tools. ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Tags added: patch-needswork --

Re: [Bug 365147] Re: suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats

2010-08-02 Thread Siegfried Gevatter
I haven't checked carefully but it looks like manpages are missing... -- suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365147 You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu. --

[Bug 365147] Re: suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats

2010-08-02 Thread Benjamin Drung
Nope, manpages are covered (mime-type is text/troff). I tested suspicious-source on the eclipse and ubuntu-dev-tools package. -- suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365147 You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,