** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106429
Title:
[backportpackage] -sa detection
Public bug reported:
backportpackage's attempt to detect whether -sa is needed or not is
foiled by private PPAs, as hitting
https://launchpad.net/~whomever/+archive/whatever/+files/my_file
redirects to the login page. httplib2 follows redirects, and the login
page returns a 200, so
We used to generate backport version numbers of the form
VERSION_BEING_BACKPORTED~RELEASE_CODENAME1. It worked well at the time
because it guaranteed that a backport of the same version to, e.g.,
natty would have a lower version number than the backport to oneiric,
since the n would sort before o.
Public bug reported:
It would be helpful if I could specify a UDD branch instead of a bug
number for sponsorship.
For MP-based sponsorship items, the branch is what appears in the
sponsorship queue, so finding a bug to give sponsor-patch is an extra
step. Occasionally, these merge proposals
Public bug reported:
What it says on the tin. There's no way for me to use sponsor-patch to
sponsor syncs from testing or experimental:
evan@caron:~$ sponsor-patch -k e...@ebroder.net -s 931152
Bug #931152 title: Sync schroot 1.4.25-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)
Is schroot 1.4.24-1 the
That would certainly be sufficient in this particular case, but I don't
think it's particularly hard to imagine cases where it wouldn't be. I
think it's important for this sort of developer helper tool to
ultimately leave control in the hands of the user.
--
You received this bug notification
There was discussion about this on ubuntu-devel several years ago:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2007-March/023332.html
I don't know that it was ever codified in policy, but the Vcs-* fields
aren't codified in Debian Policy either (they're part of the Developer's
Reference:
Public bug reported:
I've duped bug #896695 to bug #792146, but the duplicate bug has the
patch I want to upload.
If I use sponsor-patch -e 896695 and edit the changelog's LP closer,
sponsor-patch complains
sponsor-patch: Error: Launchpad bug #896695 is not closed by new version.
Do you
Public bug reported:
...which, when specified, should install eatmydata in the chroot and set
prefix-command=eatmydata in the chroot config.
Useful for build chroots where the build artifacts matter and what
happens in the chroot doesn't.
(Note that eatmydata was only included in the release
Public bug reported:
There's no compelling reason I shouldn't be able to run mk-sbuild as
root, especially given that it just uses sudo to do most of its work
anyway.
It makes it difficult to use when my unprivileged user is in the sbuild
group, but doesn't have sudo rights.
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
Debdiffs attached to bugs using submittodebian show up with the filename
they had when they were attached.
Since submittodebian is just using mkstemp to generate those filenames,
they usually look ugly and, among other things, lack a .diff or .debdiff
suffix.
It would be
.
backportpackage should confirm and then delete directories it wants to
use if they already exist.
** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder)
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703099
Title:
[backportpackage] support
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
At least, I assume that's what would cause this output I noticed while
running sponsor-patch:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/sponsor-patch-7sJgvH/pyside-1.0.1'
dh_clean -O--buildsystem=cmake -O--parallel
dpkg-source -b
Natty is currently at 0.8.1; current upstream is 0.8.2. I think we've
more or less caught up with upstream at this point.
Can this ticket be closed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521170
Title:
** Summary changed:
- [backportpackage] add diff option
+ [backportpackage] detect if orig.tar.gz upload needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691897
Title:
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu.
https
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu.
https
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
[19:03] bdrung ebroder: optional 3) i want the workdir in /tmp for
sponsor-patch too
** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder)
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev
of the builder
classes, which does whatever magic is necessary)
** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder)
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
Every once and a while I want to grab a source package without actually
unpacking it (e.g. I only want to use it for generating a debdiff). In
those cases, it would be convenient if pull-lp-source supported
something analogous to dget's
Here's a proposed interface we could use:
Add a new option --builder or -B, which takes an argument of either
sbuild or pbuilder (and obviously others if we add support for more
builders in the future). If -B isn't specified, check
SPONSOR_PATCH_BUILDER, and if that's unset, default to pbuilder
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
I use sbuild instead of pbuilder. I would be more likely to use sponsor-
patch if there was an option (or even better, a configuration flag) to
make it use sbuild.
** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
I was made aware of ubuntu-qa-tools today. Not only is QA an important
part of development, but many of the tools seem like they would be
useful to me doing development independent of doing QA on development.
I would like for
I'm submitting this as an Ubuntu patch because ubuntu-qa-tools isn't
currently in Debian (and there's no ITP). This change should presumably
go upstream to Debian if/when qa-tools becomes available in Debian as
well.
--
ubuntu-dev-tools should depend on ubuntu-qa-tools
Iain: Yes, you're of course correct. I've updated the bug (and branch)
to ask for recommends instead of depends.
** Summary changed:
- ubuntu-dev-tools should depend on ubuntu-qa-tools
+ ubuntu-dev-tools should recommend ubuntu-qa-tools
** Description changed:
Binary package hint:
It seems the preferred way of handling this problem these days is using
dkms. If you install the openafs-modules-dkms package along with an
appropriate headers metapackage (i.e. linux-headers-server or linux-
headers-generic), you should never have to worry about your kernel
modules falling out of
ACK from MOTU
** Changed in: simutrans (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: simutrans (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
Please sync simutrans 102.2.1~ds1-1 (universe) from Debian (unstable)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511662
You received this bug
Good merge. Sorry for the delay in getting it uploaded, but I've just
sponsored this.
** Changed in: bochs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned)
--
Please merge bochs 2.4.2-1(universe) from debian sqeeze(main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504740
You received this bug
** Changed in: wxbanker (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: wxbanker (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
Please update wxbanker to 0.6.1.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504884
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
This all looks good - thanks for the revisions.
I'll sponsor the upload in a few minutes.
** Changed in: wxbanker (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
** Changed in: wxbanker (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned)
--
Please update wxbanker to 0.6.1.0
https
** Changed in: ccbuild (Ubuntu)
Assignee: A. Bram Neijt (bneijt) = Evan Broder (broder)
** Changed in: ccbuild (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
New upstream release, 2.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503522
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Changed in: ccbuild (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned)
--
New upstream release, 2.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503522
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
** Changed in: pdp (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = In Progress
** Changed in: pdp (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
** Changed in: pdp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
pdp: FTBFS on Lucid: open() needs 3 arguments
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Good work - I've sponsored this.
For future reference, I didn't catch it before actually uploading, but
Ubuntu doesn't use the urgency field in changelogs, so it should be left
at low. No worries, though.
** Changed in: pdp (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned)
--
pdp
I think it would be preferable to not have a debian/changelog entry for
0.6.0.0. If someone really cares, they can get that information from the
upstream changelog.
You also dropped an entry from the debian/changelog - version
0.5.0.0-0ubuntu2. Changelog entries should never be deleted.
Finally,
** Changed in: bochs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: bochs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
** Changed in: bochs (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please merge bochs 2.4.2-1(universe) from debian sqeeze(main)
https
Sorry, two more things I missed on my first look through:
- You dropped the debian/compat file - that's needed to inform
debhelper's behavior
- What...exactly are those postinsts and postrms doing? They don't
appear to save anything locally or run anything locally, so I have to
assume they're
** Changed in: firmware-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: firmware-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: firmware-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
please update firmware-tools to 2.1.9
https
** Changed in: firmware-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned)
--
please update firmware-tools to 2.1.9
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504241
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
For future reference, bugs should never be marked as confirmed by the
person who reported them.
Otherwise, great work. I've sponsored this into Lucid.
--
please update firmware-tools to 2.1.9
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504241
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: loop-aes-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: loop-aes-utils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: loop-aes-utils (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
** Changed in: loop-aes-utils (Ubuntu)
Importance
** Changed in: loop-aes-utils (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned)
--
loop-aes-utils FTBFS on lucid i386
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: libexplain (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: libexplain (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: libexplain (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
libexplain FTBFS in lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
** Changed in: libexplain (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned)
--
libexplain FTBFS in lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504137
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: starplot (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = In Progress
** Changed in: starplot (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
** Changed in: starplot (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: starplot (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder
** Changed in: hylafax (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: hylafax (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: hylafax (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
Please merge hylafax 2:6.0.3-5.1(universe) from debian sqeeze(main
ACK from MOTU
** Changed in: qnapi (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Please sync qnapi 0.1.5-8 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504626
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Looks good. ACK from MOTU.
** Changed in: jabberd14 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Please sync jabberd14 1.6.1.1-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504624
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Looks good. ACK from MOTU.
** Changed in: zhcon (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Please sync zhcon 1:0.2.6-6.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504621
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Eek, that is not how they're supposed to be dealing with the Python 2.6
transition.
But it does deal, so ACK from MOTU.
** Changed in: zope-textindexng3 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Please sync zope-textindexng3 1:3.2.2-1.2 (universe) from Debian unstable
(main).
ACK from MOTU
** Changed in: gnus (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: gnus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
Sync gnus 5.11+v0.10.dfsg-2 (universe) from Debian testing (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502945
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: pyspi (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
** Changed in: pyspi (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
Please Merge pyspi 0.6.1-1.3 (universe) from Debian testing (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502727
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: pyspi (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned)
--
Please Merge pyspi 0.6.1-1.3 (universe) from Debian testing (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502727
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
** Changed in: mypasswordsafe (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: mypasswordsafe (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
Please update mypasswordsafe to 0.0.20061216 version
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221893
You received this bug notification
Looks like the only reason this didn't hit testing was a FTBFS on mips.
ACK from MOTU.
** Changed in: x11vnc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: x11vnc (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Sync x11vnc 0.9.9-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
mish: I've gone ahead and sponsored this for upload, with a few changes.
So you know for future reference:
- If a package was changed in Ubuntu (as opposed to Debian), the format
of the version number is
upstream_version-debian_revisionubuntuubuntu_revision. If we're
not taking the package from
You need to have the linux-headers- package corresponding to your kernel
installed for dkms to work. Try installing linux-headers-generic-pae.
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
package openafs-modules-dkms 1.4.11+dfsg-1+ubuntu0.2 failed to install/upgrade:
No, it's not possible to resolve this with dependencies, because it's
not possible to change dependencies based on which kernel you have
installed (and no, linux-headers-generic | linux-headers-generic-pae |
etc doesn't do the right thing here).
My understanding is that this will be somewhat
** Changed in: nip2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: nip2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: nip2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
Please merge nip2 7.20.6-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https
** Changed in: nip2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned)
--
Please merge nip2 7.20.6-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501104
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
It looks like there's been a new version of gnome-lirc-properties
uploaded since this patch was posted (version 0.4.0-0ubuntu1)
Could somebody verify that this patch is still needed against that
version and rebase the debdiff on top of it? Please be sure to update
the debdiff to target lucid when
I'm going to go ahead and upload this, since nobody else seems to have
suggested any reason that libbfd shouldn't be linked statically.
--
oprofile should not link libbfd dynamically
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426614
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Looks good.
ACK from MOTU
** Changed in: photoprint (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: photoprint (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Sync photoprint 0.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498910
You received this bug
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
[Jaunty, Karmic SRU] openafs-modules-dkms' postinst fails repeatedly when
headers missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I don't see any action for ubuntu-universe-sponsors to take. Is there a
particular version of the package that should be uploaded? I see the
packages at http://eric.lavar.de/comp/linux/debian/, but it doesn't
sound like they've been specifically built for Lucid. They should be
built on Lucid,
** Changed in: wxformbuilder (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
** Changed in: wxformbuilder (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
new upstream release 3.1.59
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326747
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I'm confused by this debdiff. It almost looks like it's backwards:
diff -Nru ikiwiki-3.20091113/CHANGELOG ikiwiki-3.14ubuntu1/CHANGELOG
--- ikiwiki-3.20091113/CHANGELOG 2009-11-14 02:52:03.0 +0100
+++ ikiwiki-3.14ubuntu1/CHANGELOG 2009-06-05 18:16:33.0 +0200
@@
Oh - also, if this /is/ a merge, though, it'd be helpful to see the
debdiff from the Debian version as well as from the Ubuntu version
--
Please merge ikiwiki(3.20091113ubuntu1) from debian testing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/499130
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Unsubscribing ubuntu-universe-sponsors. Please re-subscribe when you've
gotten acknowledgement from ubuntu-sru.
--
gridengine 6.2-4 will not build under Karmic - patch in open upstream bug was
never applied
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496689
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: wxformbuilder (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned)
--
new upstream release 3.1.59
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326747
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Wow, dude. Chill out. I realize the get it off my radar may be
annoying for the bug that I'm taking off my radar, but that's not the
point. I spent 15 minutes looking at this bug, reading through the
comments, and trying to figure out why u-u-s had been subscribed. When I
leave u-u-s subscribed, I
Oh, sorry Rolf - I didn't see the mention that you were uploading the
new RC6. I'm taking a look at that now.
Uh, first off, since this is a merge, not a sync, you should leave the
old Ubuntu-specific changelog entries in the changelog, interleaved with
the Debian changelog. (i.e. in sorted
** Changed in: gambas2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: gambas2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
Merge gambas2 2.17.0-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498676
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: gambas2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned)
--
Merge gambas2 2.17.0-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498676
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: open-vm-tools
The kernel modules for open-vm-tools fail to build on the lucid kernel.
Build log attached.
I also tried to package and build the recent 2008.12.16 release of open-
vm-tools, and it fails in the same way.
** Affects: open-vm-tools
** Attachment added: open-vm-source.buildlog.2.6.32-8-generic.1261256327
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36984516/open-vm-source.buildlog.2.6.32-8-generic.1261256327
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #561742
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561742
** Also affects:
** Also affects: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
SRU: vmware-guestd crashing
This was done this morning as part of the autosync process.
In general, if Ubuntu has an unmodified version of the Debian package
(no ubuntu in the version number), you don't need to do anything
explicitly to sync the new version from Debian unstable (although it's
testing for the Lucid cycle).
Fixed by syncing 2009.11.16-210370-1 from Debian
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
Plugins in subdirectories are not loaded
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Since this has been fixed in the current development Ubuntu release, I'm
closing this ticket, but leaving it open against Hardy.
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
Shutdown guest using the VI Client with VMware ESX 3.0.2 doesn't work
Err, scratch that - open-vm-tools was removed from Hardy, so there's not
really anything left to fix here.
--
Shutdown guest using the VI Client with VMware ESX 3.0.2 doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191776
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
While this would be fixed with dkms integration, it sounds like this
isn't a bug, but just that the open-vm-tools modules haven't been built.
Do you still experience this bug if you follow the instructions in
/usr/share/doc/open-vm-source/README.Debian in the open-vm-source
package?
** Changed
open-vm-tools started installing a mount.vmhgfs symlink in version
2008.07.01-102166-2, which was merged into Intrepid. This bug has never
affected any Ubuntu release.
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
open-vm-tools does not install mount.vmhgfs
Closing and retargetting since this was fixed in Jaunty.
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
** Also affects: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: New =
This sounds very similar to the problem with not installing
poweron/poweroff/etc scripts described in bug #191776. That bug was
fixed in Intrepid. Can you still reproduce this issue under Lucid?
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
VMware Fusion gives error
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #561639
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561639
** Also affects: open-vm-tools (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561639
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
open-vm-tools should recommend
vmware-user and the scripts to spawn it are installed by open-vm-
toolbox, not open-vm-tools. I'm not sure how you could have had a
vmware-user available if you only installed open-vm-tools. You didn't
have an old VMWare Tools install lying around, did you?
In any case, please try installing
I believe this has been fixed in Karmic/Lucid - I've personally been
unable to reproduce it. Can anybody reproduce this bug on the
current/development Ubuntu release?
** Also affects: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu
This was fixed in 2009.11.16-210370-1 of open-vm-tools which was just
synced into Lucid.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #539282
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539282
** Also affects: open-vm-tools (Debian) via
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
open-vm-tools should recommend open-vm-toolbox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391224
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
should build kernel modules with dkms
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277556
You received this bug notification because you
grexk: thanks for the patch. A few nits for future reference:
- LP closers are generally of the form (LP: #nn) - you didn't have the hash
- It looks like you added a superfluous line to set SRC_VERSION in debian/rules
- Your version number was appropriate for a PPA upload, but not for
Well, I guess I can go ahead and ACK this myself now.
** Changed in: schroot (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Sync schroot 1.3.1-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483813
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Asheesh - I'll request the sync as soon as your new version hits
Squeeze.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Asheesh Laroia ubu...@asheesh.org wrote:
Fixed in Debian. Please do a sync into Ubuntu!
--
[Hardy, Intrepid SRU] alpine wants Build-Depends and Depends: aspell
Already fixed in openafs 1.4.11+dfsg-5.
Which is already in Lucid.
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
openafs-1.4.11 breaks pam_afs.so
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495501
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Fix from -proposed works for me on Hardy.
--
[Hardy, Intrepid SRU] alpine wants Build-Depends and Depends: aspell
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340993
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
The packages in -proposed fix repeated installation failures for me on
both Jaunty and Karmic.
--
[Jaunty, Karmic SRU] openafs-modules-dkms' postinst fails repeatedly when
headers missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Also affects: openafs (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
[SRU] openafs-modules segfault after stop
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 487535 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487535
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 487535
package openafs-modules-dkms 1.4.11+dfsg-1+ubuntu0.1 failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error
exit
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
