[Bug 219084] Re: tunapie does not play radio streams

2010-02-04 Thread Savvas Radevic
I have the same problem in ubuntu 9.10 karmic amd64. The patch seems to fix it. -- tunapie does not play radio streams https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219084 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 454866] Re: miro dependency is broken in karmic 9.10 AMD64

2010-01-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
this has been fixed as far as I can see (tested on karmic 9.10) ** Changed in: miro (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: miro (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid ** Changed in: miro (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Fix Released -- miro dependency is broken in

[Bug 147176] Re: Doesn't appear in menu

2010-01-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
This bug should be fixed in future Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx): gip (1.7.0-1-1) http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/gip http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/g/gip/gip_1.7.0-1-1/changelog ** Changed in: gip (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Doesn't appear in menu

[Bug 130225] Re: Wishlist: Include bzr log -s as Changelog

2010-01-12 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: bzr-builddeb (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- Wishlist: Include bzr log -s as Changelog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

Re: [Bug 317164] Re: Please upgrade glabels (universe) to 2.2.5 (stable) from upstream

2009-10-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
Well if one of you could become sort of independent, learn debian packaging and help around that would be great. I bet a lot of users would benefit from your contribution! 1. If you really think this package is worth updating AND that the updated version is a bugfix only, without new features,

Re: [Bug 317164] Re: Please upgrade glabels (universe) to 2.2.5 (stable) from upstream

2009-10-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
backport (or update) for jaunty, or explain you how to request a backport. On 10/19/09, TK tkris...@hotmail.com wrote: Well if one of you could become sort of independent... Here is what I do not understand: You (Savvas Radevic) created a 2.2.5 package for glabels and I gratefully pulled

Re: [Bug 317164] Re: Please upgrade glabels (universe) to 2.2.5 (stable) from upstream

2009-10-09 Thread Savvas Radevic
Ryan, read the post before yours. It says it's fixed for ubuntu karmic 9.10 (beta so far). Try it out: www.ubuntu.com/testing On 10/9/09, Ryan Novosielski novos...@umdnj.edu wrote: I don't agree that the importance is low. The product is virtually unusable without it. You're telling me that's

[Bug 190791] Re: Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu

2009-09-27 Thread Savvas Radevic
If someone wants to take and fix the packages (names, dependencies etc) please do! I might not have the time for about 6 months. I have some real life problems that I need to sort out. Plus, I'm stuck without internet except some limited access and email. Cheers! :) On 9/27/09, Paco

Re: [Bug 414239] Re: Please update packagekit-gnome to 2.27.91 version

2009-09-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
Someone else *should* take over. I won't have internet for some time. Cheers! On 9/21/09, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio a.star...@gmail.com wrote: Please re-subscribe sponsors when you're ready. Thanks! -- Please update packagekit-gnome to 2.27.91 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414239

[Bug 420434] Re: Please add dvd+rw-tools dependency (growisofs)

2009-09-08 Thread Savvas Radevic
Attaching a test-build of the above patch in pbuilder (if anyone thinks it's necessary) ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Attachment added: last_operation_log.tar.bz2 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31475276/last_operation_log.tar.bz2 -- Please add dvd+rw-tools

[Bug 420434] Re: Replace wodim dependency with dvd+rw-tools

2009-09-07 Thread Savvas Radevic
Matt, can you provide another patch that has both wodim and dvd+rw- tools? :) -- Replace wodim dependency with dvd+rw-tools https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 420434] Re: Replace wodim dependency with dvd+rw-tools

2009-09-07 Thread Savvas Radevic
For clarification, Luke *is* right :) The changelog reads: commit 383b92e77755a2337720d6656e6cdefc872025d6 Add checks for disc flags Sometimes when things fails (with wodim) it can happen that the disc is flagged as APPENDABLE UNFORMATTED: don't allow it commit

[Bug 420434] Re: Please add dvd+rw-tools dependency (growisofs)

2009-09-07 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Summary changed: - Replace wodim dependency with dvd+rw-tools + Please add dvd+rw-tools dependency (growisofs) ** Description changed: Binary package hint: brasero Follow-up bug from https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/370999 - The brasero package currently depends on wodim. It

[Bug 285930] Re: [Wishlist] dillo-2.0 Released.

2009-09-07 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Description changed: + Blocked by: fltk2 - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=364295 + Reason: License issues: http://fltk.org/str.php?L2198+P0+S-2+C0+I0+E0+Qlicen + Binary package hint: dillo The dillo project seems to have released version 2.0 with what seems to be

Re: [Bug 190791] Re: Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu

2009-09-07 Thread Savvas Radevic
*That* no, at least not right now. We're past the time for new packages, we'd have to wait for Ubuntu 10.04+ Until then, I can hopefully re-package the badly named packages (e.g. elektra to libelektra0 etc.) and report any errors the users mention. :) 2009/9/7 Shang Wu sh...@canonical.com

[Bug 363794] Re: gpk-update-viewer shows updates available even after aptitude dist-upgrade

2009-09-06 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- gpk-update-viewer shows updates available even after aptitude dist-upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 414239] Re: Please update packagekit-gnome to 2.27.91 version

2009-09-06 Thread Savvas Radevic
Hmm.. I have two mistakes in my proposed package: 1. I shouldn't be using --fail-missing - it doesn't work anyway, but dh_install --fail-missing doesn't work with cdbs packages (they use dh_install -ppackage I think). 2. I should use the patch that fixes the cast-align error:

[Bug 386438] Re: when installed, points *.sh scripts default open with application to Cuyo

2009-09-06 Thread Savvas Radevic
the problem is the desktop file: [Desktop Entry] Name=Cuyo Icon=cuyo Type=Application Terminal=false MimeType=application/x-executable; Categories=Game;BlocksGame; Comment=Play a tetris like game with many levels Comment[de]=Ein Tetris-artiges Spiel mit vielen Leveln spielen Exec=cuyo

[Bug 420434] Re: Replace wodim dependency with dvd+rw-tools

2009-09-06 Thread Savvas Radevic
Luke is probably right: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/370999/comments/24 In this case, the debian package has to include both as dependencies, right? http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582261#c5 Thanks for the report. I think I nailed down the bug. It was in

[Bug 190791] Re: Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu

2009-09-04 Thread Savvas Radevic
Does anyone want to test a new build for karmic (ubuntu 9.10)? It runs, but I don't have example files (nor the time to be frank) to test cinepaint. :) The packages for elektra, oyranos and cinepaint are currently being built in this experimental ppa:

[Bug 190791] Re: Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu

2009-09-04 Thread Savvas Radevic
Removing the assigned person, since there was no activity for quite a while. If I'm wrong, please re-set yourself. :) ** Changed in: cinepaint (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Confirmed ** Changed in: cinepaint (Ubuntu) Assignee: Caroline Ford (secretlondon) = (unassigned) -- Please

Re: [Bug 190791] Re: Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu

2009-09-04 Thread Savvas Radevic
I've done the legwork for the packaging. It's a new package, built from scratch for all 3 packages (about 4 hours of head banging against the wall). I'm new in library binary packaging, so there surely must be some mistakes in the packaging. I used cinepaint from the 0.25.0 from CVS (a version

Re: [Bug 190791] Re: Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu

2009-09-04 Thread Savvas Radevic
built from scratch Correction: built from scratch based on fedora, archlinux and old debian cinepaint package. -- Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 420434] [NEW] Replace wodim dependency with dvd+rw-tools

2009-08-28 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero Follow-up bug from https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/370999 The brasero package currently depends on wodim. It should be replaced with dvd+rw-tools package, which contains the growisofs utility. ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Bug 190791] Re: Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu

2009-08-28 Thread Savvas Radevic
I think we just have to wait for a stable release with a .tar.gz: On the Linux side, I thought I was going to quickly wrap a release long ago so we can get back into Ubuntu and Debian. When I did some testing I found fresh bugs in the CVS version. One that's particularly annoying is all the

[Bug 329709] Re: [needs packaging] CinePaint has updated version of 0.25

2009-08-28 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 190791 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 190791 Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu -- [needs packaging] CinePaint has updated version of 0.25 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329709 You received this

[Bug 138015] Re: Cinepaint crashes when opening preferences

2009-08-28 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: cinepaint (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- Cinepaint crashes when opening preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138015 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 420434] Re: Replace wodim dependency with dvd+rw-tools

2009-08-28 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Tags added: packaging ** Tags added: bitesize -- Replace wodim dependency with dvd+rw-tools https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 414239] Re: Please update packagekit-gnome to 2.27.91 version

2009-08-27 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Summary changed: - Please update packagekit-gnome to 2.27.5 version + Please update packagekit-gnome to 2.27.91 version ** Description changed: Binary package hint: packagekit-gnome - 2.27.2 - 2.27.5 please update. + 2.27.2 - 2.27.91 please update. ** Changed in: packagekit-gnome

[Bug 414239] Re: Please update packagekit-gnome to 2.27.91 version

2009-08-27 Thread Savvas Radevic
This new upstream release (2.27.91) fixes bug #406426 and the GDK_MULTIHEAD_SAFE problem (disabled by default). * New upstream release (LP: #414239) * debian/python-packagekit-gtk.install: Check debian/tmp/usr/lib/python*/*-packages/ * debian/rules: Use dh_install --fail-missing,

[Bug 414239] Re: Please update packagekit-gnome to 2.27.91 version

2009-08-27 Thread Savvas Radevic
Tested in a virtual machine, also proposing to enable watch_active_transactions by default (it enables status icon in notification area). * New upstream release (LP: #414239) * debian/python-packagekit-gtk.install: Check debian/tmp/usr/lib/python*/*-packages/ * debian/rules: Use

[Bug 414239] Re: Please update packagekit-gnome to 2.27.91 version

2009-08-27 Thread Savvas Radevic
buildlogs from ppa: https://launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/experimental http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30904888/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-amd64.packagekit-gnome_2.27.91-0ubuntu1%2Bppa1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz

[Bug 419554] [NEW] [karmic] FTBFS report with fix proposal (and some packaging improvements)

2009-08-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
: Removed edge from XS-Vcs-Bzr.   * debian/rules: Define DEB_PYTHON_SYSTEM := pycentral Patch not tested yet, please wait. :) ** Affects: packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Savvas Radevic (medigeek) Status: New ** Description changed: Binary package hint

[Bug 419554] Re: [karmic] FTBFS report with fix proposal (and some packaging improvements)

2009-08-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Description changed: Binary package hint: packagekit-gnome Note: This is a different type of FTBFS from bug #364443 Note 2: I think this FTBFS blocks bug #406426 1. GDK_MULTIHEAD_SAFE should not be set, as it breaks with new libcanberra-gtk. Source:

[Bug 419554] Re: [karmic] FTBFS report with fix proposal (and some packaging improvements)

2009-08-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
-packagekit/ + debian/tmp/usr/share/icons/hicolor/ (LP: #349572) - Sort list * debian/copyright: Now dep5-compatible, updated FSF address. * debian/control: Removed edge from XS-Vcs-Bzr. ** Changed in: packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu) Assignee: Savvas Radevic (medigeek) = (unassigned

[Bug 364443] Re: FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386

2009-08-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
No FTBFS anymore: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit-gnome/0.3.13-0ubuntu1.1 * jaunty sparc Successfully built (DONE) * jaunty powerpc Successfully built (DONE) * jaunty lpia Successfully built (DONE) * jaunty ia64 Successfully built (DONE) * jaunty i386

[Bug 249104] Re: FTBFS on sparc, armel, hppa, ia64 due to false positive warning and -Wcast-align

2009-08-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
We might need to use the patch for karmic as well: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit-gnome/2.27.2-0ubuntu2 * karmic sparc Dependency wait * karmic powerpc Failed to build * karmic lpia Successfully built (DONE) * karmic ia64 Failed to build * karmic i386

Re: [Bug 249104] Re: FTBFS on sparc, armel, hppa, ia64 due to false positive warning and -Wcast-align

2009-08-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
accepted into jaunty-proposed, please test No FTBFS anymore! :) -- FTBFS on sparc, armel, hppa, ia64 due to false positive warning and -Wcast-align https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249104 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 249104] Re: FTBFS on sparc, armel, hppa, ia64 due to false positive warning and -Wcast-align

2009-08-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
I've created a bug report upstream about -Wcast-align: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=593177 We'll see how it goes. :) ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #593177 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=593177 -- FTBFS on sparc, armel, hppa, ia64 due to false positive warning

[Bug 415756] [NEW] Please remove acidlab - not maintained upstream

2009-08-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: acidlab acidlab is not maintained anymore, according to a Debian bug, filed for acidlab package removal: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539042 Please be so kind so as to remove 'acidlab' from Debian. Upstream is not maintaining it

Re: [Bug 213535] [NEW] gnochm - cannot read text after large images - no vertical scrollbar

2009-08-11 Thread Savvas Radevic
The bug should remain open until someone fixes it. I believe you should contact and ask the upstream author directly instead of making any assumptions about the release. :-) If the project is indeed dead, you can file a bug report to ask for its removal On 8/11/09, Tamás Kiss tkis...@gmail.com

Re: [Bug 309528]

2009-08-04 Thread Savvas Radevic
In one of the upstream bug reports, I was told that the new package will arrive from debian. I don't know if that will be done in time for ubuntu 9.10. Contact the author of pandoc for more info. :-) On 8/4/09, Artur Rona ari-tc...@tlen.pl wrote: ** Summary changed: - [karmic] Please upgrade

[Bug 158124] Re: Nautilus icon is blurred in Compiz window switcher

2009-07-31 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 149047 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149047 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 163640 nautilus browser icon is unsharp when using bigger size versions ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 149047 Various icons don't have 48x48

[Bug 405234] Re: [karmic] Please update hugin to 0.8.0 version

2009-07-28 Thread Savvas Radevic
Sennaista, read about stable release updates: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure They are provided only under the condition that the current package does not work as expected and is *really* buggy. Nominate for release on the top of the bug page is used for that. However if

Re: [Bug 405234] Re: [karmic] Please update hugin to 0.8.0 version

2009-07-28 Thread Savvas Radevic
Hence my question about karmic and jaunty; if it's packaged for karmic then why not include it in jaunty repositories too. When a release is marked as stable, it means that it will contain stable working no-important-error packages. The packages should run and their contents should be used

[Bug 405813] [NEW] Please sync tucan (universe) to 0.3.8-1 from Debian unstable

2009-07-28 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tucan 0.3.8-1 includes an important bugfix release which prevents data loss: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=531392 According to the bug report: the add links-window will drop all pasted links if links are not checked before **

[Bug 392426] Re: Please sync 0.8.1-1 from Debian

2009-07-25 Thread Savvas Radevic
confirming the bug, subscribed ubuntu-universe-sponsors :) ** Changed in: rednotebook (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Please sync 0.8.1-1 from Debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392426 You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is a direct

Re: [Bug 392426] Re: Please sync 0.8.1-1 from Debian

2009-07-25 Thread Savvas Radevic
Please don't set to Confirmed in future Noted, thanks! And I mixed up MOTU and MOTU-Release, but couldn't undo it. Just mention that in a comment or in IRC (#ubuntu-motu) in the future, someone will undo it. ;) -- Please sync 0.8.1-1 from Debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392426 You

[Bug 317164] Re: [need-update] glabels to latest stable version Release 2.2.5 (Stable) in Ubuntu 9.04

2009-07-25 Thread Savvas Radevic
Please unsubscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors. It needs someone to provide a diff.gz for the new upstream release. I'll see what I can do. :) ** Tags added: upgrade ** Summary changed: - [need-update] glabels to latest stable version Release 2.2.5 (Stable) in Ubuntu 9.04 + Please upgrade

[Bug 403507] [NEW] Please sync smc (universe) to 1.8-1 from Debian unstable (main)

2009-07-23 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: smc There was an inconsistency that required a -dev package (libcegui- mk2-dev). There was also an FTBFS error and the package depends on unversioned libboost-filesystem-dev. This is now fixed in 1.8-1 package, please sync. :) * New upstream release.

[Bug 344189] Re: [karmic] Bad encoding for po/el.po file - should be utf-8

2009-07-22 Thread Savvas Radevic
3.14.0 is in karmic, so I think yes, this is probably fixed! ** Changed in: devede (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- [karmic] Bad encoding for po/el.po file - should be utf-8 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 309528] Re: [karmic] Please upgrade pandoc to 1.2.1 version

2009-07-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
I've done some substantial and basic work on this package (It needs a debian/changelog merge). It still needs zip-archive however: Configuring pandoc-1.2.1... setup: At least the following dependencies are missing: zip-archive =0.1.1 dh_haskell_configure: command returned error code 256

Re: [Bug 309528] Re: [karmic] Please upgrade pandoc to 1.2.1 version

2009-07-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
Unfortunately we have to wait for someone to make a debian package for the zip-archive, as I don't have any experience with cabal / haskell packages. I tried to include it somehow, but couldn't succeed, I don't know the language, I am just trying to help. :) -- [karmic] Please upgrade pandoc to

[Bug 309528] Re: [karmic] Please upgrade pandoc to 1.2.1 version

2009-07-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
Done and linked to Debian :) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402783 ** Description changed: Binary package hint: pandoc Please upgrade out-of-date package pandoc to 1.2.1 version. + + STATUS: + This bug is blocked by a dependency requirement, haskell-zip-archive: +

[Bug 385833] Re: hello am bhavani shankar

2009-07-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
It has to be merged, not synced! The changes introduced in libmtp package from 0.3.7-4 up to 0.3.7-7 are debian-specific. And changes from 0.3.7-1 (Ubuntu karmic current version is based on this one) until 0.3.7-3 are really minor. In other words, I would leave the current Ubuntu version as it

[Bug 385833] Re: Please sync libmtp 0.3.7-7 (main) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-07-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
I think we have to wait the next Debian stable release in order to sync the Ubuntu packages properly. :) -- Please sync libmtp 0.3.7-7 (main) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385833 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 136435] Re: smc - Secret Maryo Chronicles - unmet dependency

2009-07-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
According to: http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/smc ..the package depends on: libcegui-mk2-dev The file /usr/share/games/smc/icon/window_32.png exists in smc-data: http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/all/smc-data/filelist You probably have a different version, execute this command (in gnome

[Bug 399873] [NEW] Please package python3.1 version 3.1 stable from upstream

2009-07-15 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Is it possible to update the python3.1 package from rc2 to 3.1 stable at this time? This is the changelog: *Release date: 27-June-2009* Core and Builtins - - Issue #6334: Fix bug in range length calculation for ranges with large arguments. - Issue #6329:

Re: [Bug 393978] Re: Please update firefox-3.5 from beta/rc to stable

2009-07-11 Thread Savvas Radevic
Hi José, Jaunty updates have the latest stable firefox-3.5: http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=firefox-3.5 Also check out this blog post about the name Shiretoko: http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/161-FAQ-Why-is-my-firefox-3.5-still-called-Shiretoko.html -- Please update

Re: [Bug 363192] Re: sqlite3 packaged in Jaunty cannot open databases which use indexed keyword, and is therefore incompatible with Axiom

2009-07-09 Thread Savvas Radevic
And this is the expected result with a newer sqlite3 (no-change rebuild from Debian): $ apt-cache policy sqlite3 sqlite3: Installed: 3.6.13-1ubuntu0~ppajaunty1 Candidate: 3.6.13-1ubuntu0~ppajaunty1 Version table: *** 3.6.13-1ubuntu0~ppajaunty1 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net

[Bug 397479] [NEW] Please sync luckybackup (universe) to 0.3.3-1 from Debian unstable

2009-07-09 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: luckybackup Please sync to the new version. It addresses a serious issue concerning files in destination folder. Example: A user sets destination as /media/my_disk/ instead of creating a new destination folder /media/my_disk/mybackup/. This results in

[Bug 397479] Re: Please sync luckybackup (universe) to 0.3.3-1 from Debian unstable

2009-07-09 Thread Savvas Radevic
P.S. It's not yet in the debian repos: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/luckybackup/ http://incoming.debian.org/luckybackup_0.3.3-1.dsc I'll sign up the sponsors as soon as the package hits the Debian repositories! -- Please sync luckybackup (universe) to 0.3.3-1 from Debian unstable

[Bug 285930] Re: [Wishlist] dillo-2.0 Released.

2009-07-08 Thread Savvas Radevic
Devid, were can I find information about fltk2 2.1.1? Their website doesn't list 2.1.1: http://fltk.org/software.php -- [Wishlist] dillo-2.0 Released. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285930 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 285930] Re: [Wishlist] dillo-2.0 Released.

2009-07-08 Thread Savvas Radevic
Ah sorry, it's fltk2 2.0 :) -- [Wishlist] dillo-2.0 Released. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285930 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 396941] [NEW] Please sync ddclient 3.8.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable

2009-07-08 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ddclient Can you please sync ddclient 3.8.0-4 from Debian unstable? There was a rather annoying bug, the init script did not pass the pid file and it could not track the running status of the ddclient daemon: http://bugs.debian.org/534974 This has been

[Bug 396938] [NEW] Please sync ddclient 3.8.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable

2009-07-08 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ddclient Can you sync ddclient 3.8.0-4 from Debian unstable? Up to 3.8.0-3 (current version in karmic) there was an annoying bug, the daemon init script didn't take care of the pid file, and the pid variable had to be passed in the /etc/ddclient.conf

Re: [Bug 396941] Re: Please sync ddclient 3.8.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable

2009-07-08 Thread Savvas Radevic
ddclient (3.8.0-4ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low  * Merge from debian unstable, Ubuntu remaining changes:    - Add debian/patches/sample_ubuntu.diff. Argh, I didn't notice it's a merge, sorry! P.S. That was quick, thanks! :) -- Please sync ddclient 3.8.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable

Re: [Bug 193818] Re: Please update to latest 0.6

2009-07-08 Thread Savvas Radevic
Well, Devid Antonio Filoni (the packager) is already subscribed to this bug, I guess they will be notified of the package name problem. :) -- Please update to latest 0.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 396548] [NEW] Please update to the latest upstream release 1.0.0

2009-07-07 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vlc Can you please include the latest stable version of vlc (1.0.0) in karmic repositories? http://www.videolan.org/vlc/ Thank you! ** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: upgrade ** Description changed:

[Bug 393978] Re: Please update firefox-3.5 from beta/rc to stable

2009-07-06 Thread Savvas Radevic
Nominated for Dapper by Bit-Man Nominated for Hardy by Bit-Man Nominated for Intrepid by Bit-Man Nominated for Karmic by Bit-Man Bit-man, you shouldn't have done that. First of all, the package is already in karmic: http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/firefox-3.5 Secondly, the package

[Bug 394672] [NEW] Please sync gnote 0.5.2-1 (universe) from Debian unstable

2009-07-02 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnote There was a data corruption bug in 0.5.1-1, please sync the karmic version to 0.5.2-1 :) ** Affects: gnote (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please sync gnote 0.5.2-1 (universe) from Debian unstable

Re: [Bug 393978] Re: Please update firefox-3.5 from beta/rc to stable

2009-07-02 Thread Savvas Radevic
This is not special in the security repo. The repo reflect exactly what will go into jaunty-updates. The more testers use the repo, the sooner this can go out. Thanks! Alexander, what do you mean? - The shiretoko and the shiretoko (non-foxy) icon will remain? - The desktop menu item (

[Bug 393978] [NEW] Please update firefox-3.5 from beta/rc to stable

2009-06-30 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.5 Can you please update firefox-3.5 package to the newest available stable version: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/3.5/releasenotes/ http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/upgrade.html Also, if possible, backport it to jaunty

[Bug 389359] Re: Please sync gnote 0.5.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable

2009-06-29 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: gnote (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Please sync gnote 0.5.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 350562] Re: [Bug 344079] Re: cannot run gdesklets with python2.6

2009-06-27 Thread Savvas Radevic
because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. 2009/6/27 Savvas Radevic vice...@gmail.com: Karmic? No backport scheduled? What for? Doesn't the package in jaunty work? -- gdesklets requires python2.5 without package dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350562 You received this bug

[Bug 193818] Re: Please update to latest 0.6

2009-06-27 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Tags added: needs-packaging -- Please update to latest 0.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 386438] [NEW] when installed, points *.sh scripts default open with application to Cuyo

2009-06-12 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cuyo When I installed cuyo, the *.sh scripts default open with application now points to Cuyo. $ apt-cache policy cuyo cuyo: Installed: 2.~-1.1-1ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.~-1.1-1ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.~-1.1-1ubuntu1 0 500

Re: [Bug 386438] [NEW] when installed, points *.sh scripts default open with application to Cuyo

2009-06-12 Thread Savvas Radevic
When I installed cuyo, the *.sh scripts default open with application now points to Cuyo. If it matters, the .sh had an sh hashbang: #!/bin/sh -- when installed, points *.sh scripts default open with application to Cuyo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386438 You received this bug notification

[Bug 330605] Re: [needs packaging] cgal 3.4

2009-06-11 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: cgal (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- [needs packaging] cgal 3.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 379703] Re: brasero burn speed of data dvd is low, about 0.3x

2009-06-07 Thread Savvas Radevic
Mine is burned at ~0.5x speeds As a sidenote, imgburn on windows works as expected. Attached screenshots: 0. Everything goes well until about 50%. 1. Afterwards, it continues, but the report does not show anything. The speed jiggles from 689KiB/s to 706KiB/s and vice versa, the burning keeps

[Bug 379703] Re: brasero burn speed of data dvd is low, about 0.3x

2009-06-07 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 370999 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370999 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 370999 Brasero reports 0% done until finished burning -- brasero burn speed of data dvd is low, about 0.3x https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379703 You

[Bug 378493] Re: [upgrade] Please update devede 3.12c-0ubuntu1 (multiverse) to 3.13.1 from upstream or debian multimedia

2009-05-29 Thread Savvas Radevic
I think yes. The developer targetted some interface bugs with the fonts and the save as button :) # Version 3.13.1 # Save as... option now works. # The Title properties window closes when the user changes the action to do when the title ends. Fixed. # When the $HOME/.spumux directory didn't

[Bug 374440] Re: Please merge cgal 3.3.1-4ubuntu1 (multiverse) to 3.4-4 from Debian unstable (non-free)

2009-05-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
boost1.38 has been accepted, I'm re-attaching the patch with boost1.38, including LP: #374440 in the changelog. ** Attachment removed: cgal with boost1.38 (ignore) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26532242/cgal_3.4-4ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Attachment added: cgal with boost1.38

[Bug 237674] Re: [karmic] Please merge python-zsi (2.1~a1-2) (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-05-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Branch unlinked: lp:~medigeek/+junk/bug-237674 -- [karmic] Please merge python-zsi (2.1~a1-2) (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

Re: [Bug 344189] Re: [karmic] Bad encoding for po/el.po file - should be utf-8

2009-05-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
Savvas, does version 3.13.0 fix the issue? Yes, I just tried the version from debian multimedia with this command: LANGUAGE=el_GR:el LANG=el_GR.UTF-8 devede works perfectly :) -- [karmic] Bad encoding for po/el.po file - should be utf-8 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344189 You received

[Bug 374440] Re: Please merge cgal 3.3.1-4ubuntu1 (multiverse) to 3.4-4 from Debian unstable (non-free)

2009-05-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
) Assignee: Savvas Radevic (medigeek) = (unassigned) -- Please merge cgal 3.3.1-4ubuntu1 (multiverse) to 3.4-4 from Debian unstable (non-free) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 374440] Re: Please merge cgal 3.3.1-4ubuntu1 (multiverse) to 3.4-4 from Debian unstable (non-free)

2009-05-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
Sorry, forgot to add LP: #374440 - fixed! ** Attachment added: cgal_3.4-4ubuntu1.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26931216/cgal_3.4-4ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Attachment removed: cgal with boost1.37 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26930559/cgal_3.4-4ubuntu1.diff.gz -- Please merge cgal

[Bug 378493] [NEW] Please update devede 3.12c-0ubuntu1 (multiverse) to 3.13.0 from upstream or debian multimedia

2009-05-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: devede Version 3.13.0 * Fixed the greek translation (This one addresses launchpad bug #344189) * Doesn't fail when LANG is not defined * Migration from LibGLADE to GtkBuilder Please update to the latest available version from upstream. Thank you! **

[Bug 378493] Re: [upgrade] Please update devede 3.12c-0ubuntu1 (multiverse) to 3.13.0 from upstream or debian multimedia

2009-05-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Summary changed: - Please update devede 3.12c-0ubuntu1 (multiverse) to 3.13.0 from upstream or debian multimedia + [upgrade] Please update devede 3.12c-0ubuntu1 (multiverse) to 3.13.0 from upstream or debian multimedia ** Tags added: upgrade -- [upgrade] Please update devede

[Bug 377054] Re: eggdrop/windrop remote crash vulnerability

2009-05-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: eggdrop (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- eggdrop/windrop remote crash vulnerability https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 377247] Re: Please merge eggdrop 1.6.19-1.1ubuntu1 (universe) to 1.6.19-1.2 from Debian unstable

2009-05-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Attachment added: eggdrop_karmic.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26811658/eggdrop_karmic.patch -- Please merge eggdrop 1.6.19-1.1ubuntu1 (universe) to 1.6.19-1.2 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377247 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 377247] [NEW] Please merge eggdrop 1.6.19-1.1ubuntu1 (universe) to 1.6.19-1.2 from Debian unstable

2009-05-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eggdrop Please merge eggdrop 1.6.19-1.1ubuntu1 (universe) to 1.6.19-1.2 from Debian unstable eggdrop (1.6.19-1.2) unstable; urgency=high * Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team. * Apply upstream patch to fix incomplete patch for

[Bug 377247] Re: Please merge eggdrop 1.6.19-1.1ubuntu1 (universe) to 1.6.19-1.2 from Debian unstable

2009-05-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
Packages successfully built: https://launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/experimental/+sourcepub/631788/+listing-archive-extra -- Please merge eggdrop 1.6.19-1.1ubuntu1 (universe) to 1.6.19-1.2 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377247 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 377054] Re: eggdrop/windrop remote crash vulnerability

2009-05-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Attachment added: eggdrop_intrepid.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26811732/eggdrop_intrepid.patch -- eggdrop/windrop remote crash vulnerability https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 377054] Re: eggdrop/windrop remote crash vulnerability

2009-05-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Attachment added: eggdrop_jaunty.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26811734/eggdrop_jaunty.patch -- eggdrop/windrop remote crash vulnerability https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 377054] Re: eggdrop/windrop remote crash vulnerability

2009-05-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
I hope these are ok. :) I can't test them at the moment (maybe in about 4 days when I go back home). The packages build fine: https://launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/experimental/+sourcepub/631791/+listing-archive-extra

Re: [Bug 377054] Re: eggdrop/windrop remote crash vulnerability

2009-05-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
You believe it affects Hardy, 1.6.18? By the way, about Karmic, I have opened a request for merge: bug #377247 Should I close it? -- eggdrop/windrop remote crash vulnerability https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

Re: [Bug 377054] Re: eggdrop/windrop remote crash vulnerability

2009-05-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
- the versioning is almost perfect, but needs to be higher than the existing versions. Instead of 1.6.19-1.1ubuntu0.9.04.1, you'd want 1.6.19-1.1ubuntu1.9.04.1 since 1.6.19-1.1ubuntu1 is already in the archive and higher than 1.6.19-1.1ubuntu0.9.04.1. The distro-numbering is right on, though.

Re: [Bug 377054] Re: eggdrop/windrop remote crash vulnerability

2009-05-15 Thread Savvas Radevic
I can try, but I'm not at home unfortunately, perhaps tomorrow - if anyone wants to do this, be my guest! :) -- eggdrop/windrop remote crash vulnerability https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 330605] Re: [needs packaging] cgal 3.4

2009-05-10 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: cgal (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- [needs packaging] cgal 3.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com

  1   2   3   4   5   >