[Bug 519167] Re: Gtkpod's built-in Eject function doesn't work

2010-02-12 Thread Vladimir Mityukov
Note: Dolphin's and Device Notifier's Safely remove only un-mounts, but not ejects (so, it's still Connected). And there is no separate Eject button in the dolphin/device notifier at all. Just updated to KDE SC 4.4. The Device notifier now disconnects iPod properly. The questions about What is

[Bug 519167] Re: Gtkpod's built-in Eject function doesn't work

2010-02-12 Thread Vladimir Mityukov
It is to save changes in the iPod, if the eject option is not used the DB and files remain unchanged. Isn't this is what the Save icon in the tool bar for? I mean, strange.. -- Gtkpod's built-in Eject function doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519167 You received this bug

[Bug 519167] Re: Gtkpod's built-in Eject function doesn't work

2010-02-12 Thread Vladimir Mityukov
Well, it's not obvious, I think... In particular, in my daily using of the program, I always clicked Save thinking it's flushing all changes to the device, and I clicked Eject just in case. So, I had many chances to loose the data (which wasn't happen just because of some luck). I think Save

[Bug 519167] [NEW] Gtkpod's built-in Eject function doesn't work

2010-02-08 Thread Vladimir Mityukov
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gtkpod Hi, I'm using gtkpod(-aac) package on my PC with Kubuntu 9.10. I have iPod Classic 80GB Here's quick info on the package: Package: gtkpod State: installed Automatically installed: yes Version: 0.99.14-2ubuntu3 Priority: extra Section:

[Bug 312898] Re: libxxx-unstripped should also Provide libxxx

2009-04-30 Thread Vladimir Mityukov
Side note: I'm pretty sure, kradio does not require unstripped libav*-dev packages.. However, I can't install regular ones as well, if I have kubuntu-restricted-extras installed (and I have it, since it's useful for me), because they conflict. So the problem is that you cannot install

[Bug 312898] Re: libxxx-unstripped should also Provide libxxx

2009-04-28 Thread Vladimir Mityukov
2Reinhard Tartler: In ubuntu, we do not want ANY applications to be built against the *unstripped* variants of libavcodec as a saftey guard. If users want to do that at home, fine, but we actually cannot do that in ubuntu because that introduces just even more confusion as we already have in