On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Chris Aniszczyk caniszc...@gmail.com wrote:
The project plan for Eclipse 3.6 is here:
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=eclipse
This is for the Eclipse platform though. Eclipse is a large place and
there are many projects within
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:57 PM, aporteradrian-j6...@aporter.org wrote:
Yes thanks very much for eclipse 3.4 in karmic.
I have to ask, why does the eclipse-platform package depend on the
firefox package?
Eclipse uses a particular version of xulrunner for various functions
e.g., to display the
The problem is that, for the most part, there is no debian/ubuntu
eclipse team.
There is mostly just individuals right now, many with almost no free time
(e.g., I don't even use eclipse nowadays).
Removing the ancient 3.2 version might help bring a few more interested
developers to assist
Btw, some things the eclipse team could do to make packagers' lives easier
and increase the chances for an eclipse version that meets debian's high
freedom/quality standards:
* Test your code with openjdk.
* Assist with building eclipse in a headless manner from the command-line.
(this
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Vincenzo Cianciavincenzo...@yahoo.it wrote:
I think the request to remove eclipse from ubuntu is extremely smart. If
eclipse will want to be in ubuntu they'll need to cooperate themselves,
as ubuntu clearly does not have enough man power. On the other hand,
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Luca Saba lucas...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like too! Ready to learn!
Testing is great but what is missing right now is someone with enough free time
to do the actual work. I 'll hopefully have some free time in the beginnings of
July but not before.
--
Upgrade to
Well, why not aim for 3.5 instead? It is not like the work required
to get 3.4.x in shape is any less, or that it would
be finished before 3.5 is out anyway. (Of course that is just imho).
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification
Fwiw:
1) The statement that eclipse doesn't need packaging and it is trivial
to install standalone is imho *a joke*.
The fact is, eclipse *does* have dependencies on other stuff that is
installed via the package system
(by far the most painful of which is, of course, mozilla/xulrunner).
As a christmas present, a pre-pre-pre-alpha version of an eclipse 3.4.1 package
is now available in my
PPA;
http://launchpad.net/~pktoss/+archive
Details are available in this email to pkg-java-
maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-
Or, you could continue waiting patiently and (judging from history so far)
maybe by 2012, eclipse packages will be in ubuntu Vintage Vinegar or
something ;-)
In 2012, one can expect Ubuntu Porky Piglet (LTS release) and Queer
Quacker (normal release), following the naming policy. It's not
I 'd like to invite all subscribers to this bug to pkg-java-
maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
We are trying to start an effort to get eclipse-3.4 and its ilk in shape
for debian. From there merging it to ubuntu will be much easier.
The big problem is we don't have anyone working full time on
11 matches
Mail list logo
