[Bug 264950] Re: Azureus doesn't allow ports above 49151

2010-01-12 Thread quequotion
I think this should be reconsidered by the Vuze development team. I know Ubuntu's bug tracker is not the best place to try and get their attention, but it's worth a shot. You can read my (slightly ranty and undeservingly infuriated) post here: http://ubuntu-ky.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=865

[Bug 358255] Re: [jaunty] Root on nvidia raid 1 mirror does not boot

2009-10-15 Thread quequotion
I am having this problem but I can't get anywhere because BusyBox doesn't recognize any input... in fact, the keyboard seems to be disabled when busybox appears (Num, Caps, and Scroll Lock do nothing) Any ideas? I can get into the system from a live cd by chroot and it looks like my Jaunty ins

[Bug 356503] Re: [patch] Ubuntu Jaunty 9.04 dmraid fails with Kernel 2.6.28

2009-10-15 Thread quequotion
also, at boot dmraid is complaining that it can't find libdl.so.2, which is apparently part of libc6 () which is installed... the file is at /lib/libdl.so.2. -- [patch] Ubuntu Jaunty 9.04 dmraid fails with Kernel 2.6.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356503 You received this bug notifica

[Bug 356503] Re: [patch] Ubuntu Jaunty 9.04 dmraid fails with Kernel 2.6.28

2009-10-15 Thread quequotion
just tried this patch on a system booting from a RAID:0 which also fails. It was no use at all. When I installed the patched dmraid only one of the kernel's initramfs was updated, the -rt kernel. it seems update-initramfs defaults to this behavior unless i specify "-k all" Is there any way to w

[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-10-14 Thread quequotion
Would this fix have any effect on the bug with installing a new system to raid or upgrading a system already installed to raid? I'll give it a try later but I'm far from my PC at the moment. -- DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713 You received thi

[Bug 55428] Re: Helper applications cannot be changed, even when asked to do so by Firefox.

2009-10-08 Thread quequotion
UPDATE I upgraded to Swiftweasel 3.5.3 and the bug has become intermittent. Once in a while it complains that various applications do not exist, but later during the same browsing session the problem is gone. I have seen discussion of this bug elsewhere as related to xulrunner, which serves as an

[Bug 287751] Re: [Intrepid] dmraid 5 error: "raid4-5" not in kernel

2009-10-07 Thread quequotion
Some relevant information from my syslog: #kernel loads 'sd' driver and detects (correctly) one of the four 500GB drives of which my 2TB RAID:0 consists. Oct 7 19:20:43 quequotion kernel: [7.109183] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 976773168 512-byte hardware sectors (500108 MB) [...] #kern

[Bug 287751] Re: [Intrepid] dmraid 5 error: "raid4-5" not in kernel

2009-10-07 Thread quequotion
I have the same issue as Alex. I am not sure anything is actually wrong. I get these messages at boot, but I don't notice any problems with my system. I suppose the ultimate test would be to fill the drive to the end once with a single large file and then again with multiple small files and see

[Bug 55428] Re: Helper applications cannot be changed, even when asked to do so by Firefox.

2009-09-24 Thread quequotion
YES! This bug, or something very similar is still a problem. I'm using Swiftweasel 3.5 now, but I had the same problem with a previous version of firefox several months ago. Inexplicably, all mime handlers are broken as of three minutes ago. This started mid-browsing and persists after restart.

[Bug 315735] Re: FakeRAID fails with kernel 2.6.28

2009-03-17 Thread quequotion
My RAID is an nvidia fakeRAID:0. In the end, I was forced to give up on the distro however. The workaround I posted was fine until I tried an update-initramfs for unrelated reasons which I don't remember clearly (the terror and rage wiped my memory just like the update wiped my boot options). Af

[Bug 315735] Re: FakeRAID fails with kernel 2.6.28

2009-02-04 Thread quequotion
nevermind. i typed "exit". so, temporary solution: Reboot, select the 2.6.27-11 kernerl if you get the initramfs prompt: dmraid -ay exit -- FakeRAID fails with kernel 2.6.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315735 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 315735] Re: FakeRAID fails with kernel 2.6.28

2009-02-04 Thread quequotion
dmraid -ay certainly works with the 2.6.27-11 kernel, big relief there. but then how do you boot the system? I don't have much experience with manually bootstrapping -- FakeRAID fails with kernel 2.6.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315735 You received this bug notification because yo