This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-dev-tools - 0.103
---
ubuntu-dev-tools (0.103) experimental; urgency=low
[ Benjamin Drung ]
* sponsor-patch:
- Fix NameError: global name 'debdiff_filename' is not defined.
- Add --workdir parameter to set the working directory.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365147
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu.
** Branch linked: lp:debian/experimental/ubuntu-dev-tools
--
suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365147
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu.
--
universe-bugs
Here's the patch for support for the various font source formats again
the latest version of suspicious-source.
** Patch added: suspicious-source-whitelist-font-source-formats.diff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53434471/suspicious-source-whitelist-font-source-formats.diff
--
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu-dev-tools
--
suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365147
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu.
--
universe-bugs mailing list
Thanks. It was a good idea to comment the whitelisted entries. I have
applied your patch.
** Tags added: patch-accepted-upstream
** Tags removed: patch-needswork
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Committed
--
suspicious-source should whitelist font source
I wrote suspicious-source from scratch. Can you please test the new one
and report, which mimetype should be whitelisted? You can get the source
by running bzr branch lp:ubuntu-dev-tools.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
** Tags added: patch-needswork
--
I haven't checked carefully but it looks like manpages are missing...
--
suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365147
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu.
--
Nope, manpages are covered (mime-type is text/troff). I tested
suspicious-source on the eclipse and ubuntu-dev-tools package.
--
suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365147
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
Can you give some good examples?
--
suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365147
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu.
--
universe-bugs mailing list
various ttf-* packages synced from Debian
--
suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365147
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu.
--
universe-bugs mailing list
Which source package contains these files?
--
suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365147
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu.
--
universe-bugs mailing list
** Attachment added: Adding various source font formats
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25857149/suspicious-source-whitelisting-font-formats.diff
--
suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365147
You received this bug notification because you are
13 matches
Mail list logo
