Let's extract the important numbers from #2's Screenshot.png: 294.9
total, 154.4 used, 140.6 free
Looking at the output of df, I can see *three* things which are
non-tmpfs/procfs/sysfs/devfs:
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/host/ubuntu/disks/root.disk
I'm having the same problem with Baobab 2.28.1 on Ubuntu 9.10.
Nautilus reports 4.3GB available and 'df -h' command report 4.4GB
available. Boabab says I have 5.7GB available.
The reason for this is in confusion over the terms 'free space' and
'available space'.
If you run System Monitor and
Baobab reports wrong disk free/used space report. See attatched
screenshot with df -h and baobab.
I'am on jaunty.
cat /etc/debian_version
5.0
** Attachment added: Wrong disk usage report.
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28596964/baobab-wrong-disk-usage-report.png
--
df -a contradicts Disk
I am having a similar issue with 9.04 AMD64 and Disk Usage Analyser.
When I do a 'Scan Filesystem' from Disk Usage Analyser it shows Total
filesystem capacity:... which are accurate and match df -h, but the
folder breakdown is vastly different from the above - Whilst the real
disk usage is over
Looking at the attachments in this bug report, I noticed that Disk
usage analyzer screenshot was flagged as a patch. A patch contains
changes to an Ubuntu package that will resolve a bug, since this was not
one I've unchecked the patch flag for it. In the future keep in mind
the definition of a
