[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2010-01-21 Thread Roger
Bug affects me too, but the following workaround is successful (as mentioned several times above): 1. disable ipv6 by adding net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1 to /etc/sysctl.conf 2. change all localhost lines to 127.0.0.1 in the /etc/privoxy/config file 3. reboot -- privoxy not start at boot

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-12-29 Thread yarly
Is this ever going to be address by the package maintainers? -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-12-29 Thread George Rodriguez
same problem here + mostly very, very sluggish performance when running with opera 10.10 or firefox 3.5.6 uninstall claimed to free 311MB disk space. privoxy 3.0.13-1, karmic latest updates, kernel 2.6.31(-16?) workaround ::1 autostarts here, but only works for firefox, opera won't accept

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-12-27 Thread Ryan Nowakowski
Roland, Your uploaded 3.0.15-2 does not fix all the problems caused by this bug. Your fix, if I'm not mistaken, forces privoxy to listen on IPv6 ::1 (localhost) instead of IPv4 127.0.0.1. This breaks IPv4 applications that attempt to forward stuff to privoxy. the workaround that I use until a

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-12-13 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
I just uploaded a new 3.0.15-2 version to the Debian archive, that should solve this issue. Maybe someone is interested to try out, whether this is the solution for you. If the package is not available via the Debian archive, have a look at http://www.spinnaker.de/debian/privoxy.html --

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-12-12 Thread t54
I had this problem running privoxy under Ubuntu karmic with all available updates installed through 12 Dec 2009 : Privoxy (version 2.0.0.23 (20090817)) installed but after a week or so, it would never actually load, whether started from the command line or by Vidalia. All of privoxy's files were

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-12-12 Thread t54
sorry, I gave the incorrect version of privoxy in my post above at #34. Instead of 'Privoxy (version 2.0.0.23 (20090817))' it should read as 'Privoxy (version 3.0.13-1)' -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-12-11 Thread 836v
Thanks Greg Eden for the workarounds on Tor. I am using JAP Jondo instead, but I will try to use Tor this way. Rgds. Victor -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-12-10 Thread Hamish Downer
I'm wondering if this is related to rc2 currently does not wait for localhost from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsTeam/Specs/LucidUpstartServerReview - which links to a possibly related bug in samba - bug #462169. -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-11-25 Thread Hamish Downer
** Tags added: ubuntu-boot-experience -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-11-22 Thread NYGFan
** Description changed: -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-11-22 Thread Tim
FYI, I tried the above listen address is set to 127.0.0.1:8118 instead of localhost:8118 workaround and it didn't work for me. Privoxy still failed to start on boot (although a later manual start worked fine). From /var/log/privoxy/logfile: Error: Can not resolve 127.0.0.1: Address family for

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-11-18 Thread Stevan Kew Ell
Confusion continues. With no apparent updates, and before I could apply the IPv6 workaround, one of my machines has started working correctly again, starting privoxy at startup. -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You received this bug notification

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-11-18 Thread Martin Mai
Since this also affects me with Ubuntu 9.10 (not with earlier versions), I am setting this bug to confirmed. ** Changed in: privoxy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: privoxy (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-11-17 Thread Stevan Kew Ell
@ richardgv #27 - sorry, yes, I have the listen address as 127.0.0.1:8118 in my config too. Before this bug really took hold, that was the first change necessary top get karmic working on comparison with Jaunty. Glad those two workarounds work for you too. -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-11-16 Thread Stevan Kew Ell
This has been driving me to distraction too, as the combination of privoxy and epiphany-webkit is great. I think I have just stumbled onto a temporary workaround, which hopefully will help to locate the bug. If you disable IPv6, it starts correctly. I put the line:-

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-11-16 Thread richardgv
@Stevan Kew Ell The workaround does not work for me. After disabling ipv6, I receive still the same error: Nov 17 11:02:53.989 b77028d0 Fatal error: can't bind to localhost:8118: The hostname is not resolvable -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-11-16 Thread richardgv
Hopefully this bug can be fixed soon. @Stevan Kew Ell I just found the workaround works if listen address is set to 127.0.0.1:8118 instead of localhost:8118. Thanks. -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-11-13 Thread richardgv
I have the same issue. 127.0.0.1:8118 workaround doesn't work for me, too. Reinstallation does not work, either. Nov 14 10:38:19.591 b77198d0 Fatal error: can't bind to localhost:8118: The hostname is not resolvable Nov 14 11:36:50.056 b78ad8d0 Fatal error: can't bind to 127.0.0.1:8118: The

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-11-12 Thread starslights
hello, After last kernel update for karmic, the bug is appear again. I need all new start reinstall privoxy . So bug still , depend of the kernel it seem. best regards -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-11-09 Thread Zack Evans
I'm running kubuntu so I don't get wireless until knetworkmanager has run, -after- desktop login. For me, Privoxy starts, but never seems to notice that I have a got a network . It seems to assume that if there was no network when it started up, there never will be one. So I have to restart the

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-11-09 Thread Alex Wauck
On my desktop (wired ethernet only), changing the privoxy upstart script to depend on $named seems to work, but it doesn't work on my notebook (wireless only). -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-11-05 Thread Greg Eden
ps If the system will not let you uninstall privoxy without removing tor, just leave it there and bypass with above settings. The changes you made to the first line of privoxy config are ignored and can be removed. -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-11-05 Thread Greg Eden
@836v If you only want tor then you can bypass privoxy altogether. Just Uninstall privoxy and set tor to use Socks5, 127.0.0.1 and port 9050. In foxyproxy edit the setup to these settings and it will work without privoxy. cheers -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-10-23 Thread kuminamoya
I can confirm this problem (hostname is not resolvable) with karmic rc - the workaround with setting the listen-address to ::1 worked for me. I work on a laptop with only WLAN connection - probably name resolution is not available fast enough? I *think* I saw the same problem with another daemon

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-10-17 Thread CPKS
Still a problem here (up to date with kernel 2.6.31-14) on one of two installations. I wonder if it's anything to do with peculiarities of the hardware, and in particular the problem occurs on a pretty fast box (boots in under half a minute). Workaround was to rename /etc/rc2.d/S20privoxy to

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-10-16 Thread starslights
Hello, From Karmic beta1 and all last updates, i have no more problem with privoxy, it boot enable again. So fixed for me my best -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-10-07 Thread CPKS
Encountered the same on new install of 9.10, but not on the installation I've been running since early alpha (both 64-bit). Changing the config file to '127.0.0.1:8118' doesn't make any difference. -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You received this bug

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-09-24 Thread Andrew B
Per the above suggestion I reininstalled privoxy 3.0.13-1 but it still does not start at boot. Still seeing: Sep 24 09:06:51.303 b805e8d0 Fatal error: can't bind to localhost:8118: The hostname is not resolvable -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-09-23 Thread starslights
well bug still, today i become this message: Sep 23 11:25:34.732 7f11e92f26f0 Fatal error: can't check configuration file '/home/starslights/config': No such file or directory i have need reinstall again privoxy . Kubuntu Karmic 9.10 64 bits, 2.6.31-10-generic and privoxy 3.0.13 on home

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-09-20 Thread starslights
well , after restarted, privoxy are enable at start again. So just reinstall privoxy and all will run again fine. The config will not lost, it just fix the braked link. -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-09-19 Thread WillWilson
I can second this, for privoxy 3.0.13-01 on a fresh karmic alpha 6 install. /var/log/privoxy/logfile reads Fatal error: can't bind to localhost:8118: The hostname is not resolvable -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427625 You received this bug notification

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-09-19 Thread starslights
hello, i am on Kubuntu karmic 64 bits, 2.6.31-10-generic and privoxy 3.0.13 on home encrypted It have always right worked so far but from the last update , it was unable to start at boot and don't find anymore the config. I have reinstalled it and work again. I have not restarted the system

[Bug 427625] Re: privoxy not start at boot - karmic

2009-09-15 Thread Andrew B
Confirmed on upgrade from Jaunty to Karmic; S20privoxy exists in /etc/rc{2345}.d/ linked to /etc/init.d/privoxy but does not start on boot. No error messages seen in daemon.log. Scripts start Privoxy successfully when manually invoked. -- privoxy not start at boot - karmic