since the were no reply in more than one year I'm closing the bug report
(even to drop the bug from the list)
** Changed in: firehol (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
** Changed in: firehol (Ubuntu)
Assignee: MOTU (motu) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification
this is not a pbuilder bug:
pbuilder does not check if he should build the package or not at all, it just
hands the .dsc to dpkg-buildpackage after satisfying build-deps.
Interestingly enough, I trying to look up "in arch list or does not
match any arch wildcards" in codesearch.d.n, and the only
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nish Aravamudan (nacc)
** Branch linked: lp:~nacc/ubuntu-dev-tools/update-vcs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
So let's do this, then. I'm going to upload to experimental, then sync
it
Although I have a question: I am totally unable to work with bzr behind
very basic stuff. Would anyone feel particularly sorry if I/we were to
move it to git? Now that launchpad supports it and so we could keep the
same
ah, so this bug wasn't added to the changelog, and I noticed only now.
Pity, so I'm marking as released now already, I just synced it, so it's now
sitting in proposed, package version 0.158.
Thanks everybody who contributed!
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed
Well, now that bionic is done, and buster has still about an year to
come, let me just merge it and have you deal with whatever happens.. :)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance:
I am serious: you are right on being tired of waiting, so I'm asking you
to give me something I can straight merge and upload as-is to unstable.
It's clear I'm not going to review it as I hoped I would, so there is
little point in trying to defer it any more (and I kind of doubt you'll
find many
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314076
Title:
pbuilder-dist: Local archives
Most probably I can, yes. But it's not a quick thing, I need to find
some appropriate time to review.
BTW, even after merging some thing I'd prefer if you could stick around
and deal with upcoming bugs in pull-pkg in the next months.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
"pip install httplib2" is no workaround for a bug in a debian package
anyway.
And if you already know it's something that has to do with httplib2, why
did you assign this bug to ubuntu-dev-tools instead of python-httplib2
(which will be updated at some point, a contributor contacted me to
update
Any chance you could finish up that MR you did in the past, so I could
do that blind merge I was talking about?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779963
Title:
create
I recommend you look at python3-argcomplete for this :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797290
Title:
no bash-completion for pull-lp-source (and probably others)
To
Public bug reported:
Hi
So I'm now releasing version 0.166, since there is an RC bug.
ubuntu-archive-assistant is not being installed, and after I looked at
why, I saw you:
* didn't add the required build-deps (I fixed this myself)
* didn't add the script to setup.py
* the new module is not
Then why is this against ubuntu-dev-tools? Maybe it should have been
against debootstrap? You also didn't specify what you are using to create
said chroot.
On Fri, 3 May 2019, 6:41 pm Brian Murray, wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.29-0ubuntu2) ...
> W:
@ddstreet, yes please.
Also, the solution here is to port everything to py3-only, btw.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841127
Title:
pull-debian-source fails with
Thank you indeed!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841127
Title:
pull-debian-source fails with "ImportError: No module named request"
To manage notifications about this
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #938740
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938740
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938740
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools
I also disagree with this FFe. Despite it seems to be working for now I
would be suprised if no regressions pop up in a few days/weeks in
unstable.
@ddstreet: I'm still waiting on your MR(s)! The more you wait it's obvios the
more it gets harder to rebase… Can't you start with a few changes
** Summary changed:
- reverse-depends does not work
+ reverse-depends: figure an alternative to qa.ubuntuwire.org/rdepends
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1625481
Title:
ubuntutools.version.Version which has strip_epoch() instead
> of debian.debian_support.Version.
> * Have ubuntu-dev-tools depend on the matching version of
> python3-ubuntutools.
>
> [ Scott Kitterman ]
> * Update requestsync to python3. Closes: #927147
>
> [ Mattia Rizzolo ]
>
The backports project in ubuntu is basically in a state where nobody is
working on it anymore. I can fix `requestbackport` to error out more
nicely in this case, but don't expect anything more.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev-
tools/commit/?id=463d1f63a8d9784f6df072abce5af773ddad1c0c
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in:
It only *recommends* bzr, it doesn't depend on it.
However, what if I swap the recommends from "bzr | brz" to "brz | bzr"?
That way, it will pick bzr first.
Anyway, regardless of this, the latest version of bzr in debian is a
transitional package to brz, so it shouldn't really matter much
Sure, having reviewed now what was merged I'd say I have nothing to
complain about :)
Thank you for your work, and sorry for lagging behind!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
This is the kind of things backports should be used for.
Are there no chances for a new backports team to appear and maintain those
pockets?
Or, have the backports work like in debian when regular maintainers/developers
upload and the team just checks the versioning is correct…
--
You
or.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1860456/+subscriptions
>
>
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapr
committed. https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev-
tools/commit/?id=f8fa865ab2a44e24260f889a3ada8a71421635be
** No longer affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Debian)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
It's not just jaunty. I've seen such packages uploaded last year too.
Though I must say it's so rare that I forgot such packages existed…
And a flag such as `--no-verify-checksums` sounds a very bad idea to
have to me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, 1:55 pm Dan Streetman,
wrote:
> > I've seen such packages uploaded last year too
>
> that's unfortunate and quite bad.
>
Well, it's a feature, although one that does create confusion in many
situations. So it's probably good that very few people know of it ^^
I'd still
more specifically, it says
Checksum for akonadi_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz does not match.
DownloadError: File akonadi_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz could not be found
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Bryce Harrington (bryce)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1193941
Title:
import-bug-from-debian crashed with
Public bug reported:
It seems that starting from a few versions, syncpackage downloads .dscs,
stores them in ~, and leaves them there.
AFAIK there is no need to download anything to sync a package, as
launchpad should be able to handle everything through its API, so I'd
say the bug is threefold:
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in
that's because starting with bullseye the security suite is named
bullseye-security instead of bullseye/updates.
(not planning to write a patch myself in the short time, hopefully
somebody else will…)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in:
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev-
tools/commit/?id=ceb020d0fae34549a3f21c6900c12c09e53eff5d + parent
commit with a bit of code reflow.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
I don't plan to backport this to focal fwiw, so somebody should feel
free to pick that piece up if they want to.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
-
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Alex Murray (alexmurray)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in
@Dan: i don't think it's proper to close 3-years old bugs as "the bug is
old" - especially not when the request looks very fine and senseful to me. ?
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, 12:16 am Dan Streetman, <1756...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> as this is years old, closing as wontfix
>
> ** Changed in:
please also consider that we backports team also have in mind to keep
u-d-t (and others) fully up-to-date in the backports suites (this should
happen within a few weeks).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
it's not "fix committed" if you are talking about a repository that is
not the main one…
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in
actually it is, sorry for the noise.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945349
Title:
ged in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapre
root@warren:/# apt install ubuntu-dev-tools/focal-proposed
...
Selected version '0.176ubuntu20.04.1' (Ubuntu:20.04/focal-proposed [all]) for
'ubuntu-dev-tools'
...
Setting up ubuntu-dev-tools (0.176ubuntu20.04.1) ...
...
root@warren:/# ubuntu-upload-permission --list-uploaders cloud-init
Please
I uploaded the said fix to focal.
After all it's a crash, so it should be fixed as such :)
** Patch added: "debdiff.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1862372/+attachment/5545461/+files/debdiff.patch
** Summary changed:
- ubuntu-upload-permission
ss
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862372
Title:
ubuntu-upload-permi
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004579
Title:
[pbuilder-dist] overwrite OTHERMIRROR set in
because pbuilder is not "a necessary tool": there are several other
alternatives to it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936697
Title:
Unlisted dependency
To manage
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in
Which version have you tested? backportpackge in u-d-t 0.187+ should
already be using the ~bp suffix.
Notably, note that 0.187 is available in focal-bpo.
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022, 8:35 pm Ross Gammon, <1959...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> Regarding the requestbackport package, it is really only the
"right now"
thanks for the ping :)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959541
Title:
** Summary changed:
- update backportpackage script to behave according to new backport process
+ update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new
backport process
** Description changed:
- The 'backportpackage' script needs to be updated to work according to the
[ Mattia Rizzolo ]
* ubuntutools/archive.py:
+ Fix operation of SourcePackage._source_urls() (as used, for example, in
SourcePackage.pull() called by backportpackage) to also work when the
class is instantiated with a URL as .dsc. Fixes regression from v0.184.
Thanks to Unit
I uploaded a fix to debian, though I forgot to include this LP bug
number in the changelog.
since 0.191 is only bugfix I plan to sync it once it's possible.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubu
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~myamada/ubuntu-dev-tools/+git/ubuntu-dev-tools/+merge/435734
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed
I just committed 0f3d2fed2a4ed67b90b5d49aab25ca2bda5d9d37 updating
requestbackport.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993969
Title:
"pbuilder-dist create ..." fails unless I create the
57 matches
Mail list logo