** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993969
Title:
"pbuilder-dist create ..." fails unless I create the
I just committed 0f3d2fed2a4ed67b90b5d49aab25ca2bda5d9d37 updating
requestbackport.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~myamada/ubuntu-dev-tools/+git/ubuntu-dev-tools/+merge/435734
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed
[ Mattia Rizzolo ]
* ubuntutools/archive.py:
+ Fix operation of SourcePackage._source_urls() (as used, for example, in
SourcePackage.pull() called by backportpackage) to also work when the
class is instantiated with a URL as .dsc. Fixes regression from v0.184.
Thanks to Unit
I uploaded a fix to debian, though I forgot to include this LP bug
number in the changelog.
since 0.191 is only bugfix I plan to sync it once it's possible.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubu
Which version have you tested? backportpackge in u-d-t 0.187+ should
already be using the ~bp suffix.
Notably, note that 0.187 is available in focal-bpo.
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022, 8:35 pm Ross Gammon, <1959...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> Regarding the requestbackport package, it is really only the
"right now"
thanks for the ping :)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959541
Title:
** Summary changed:
- update backportpackage script to behave according to new backport process
+ update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new
backport process
** Description changed:
- The 'backportpackage' script needs to be updated to work according to the
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004579
Title:
[pbuilder-dist] overwrite OTHERMIRROR set in
root@warren:/# apt install ubuntu-dev-tools/focal-proposed
...
Selected version '0.176ubuntu20.04.1' (Ubuntu:20.04/focal-proposed [all]) for
'ubuntu-dev-tools'
...
Setting up ubuntu-dev-tools (0.176ubuntu20.04.1) ...
...
root@warren:/# ubuntu-upload-permission --list-uploaders cloud-init
Please
ged in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapre
I uploaded the said fix to focal.
After all it's a crash, so it should be fixed as such :)
** Patch added: "debdiff.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1862372/+attachment/5545461/+files/debdiff.patch
** Summary changed:
- ubuntu-upload-permission
ss
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862372
Title:
ubuntu-upload-permi
actually it is, sorry for the noise.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945349
Title:
it's not "fix committed" if you are talking about a repository that is
not the main one…
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in
please also consider that we backports team also have in mind to keep
u-d-t (and others) fully up-to-date in the backports suites (this should
happen within a few weeks).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
@Dan: i don't think it's proper to close 3-years old bugs as "the bug is
old" - especially not when the request looks very fine and senseful to me. ?
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, 12:16 am Dan Streetman, <1756...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> as this is years old, closing as wontfix
>
> ** Changed in:
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev-
tools/commit/?id=ceb020d0fae34549a3f21c6900c12c09e53eff5d + parent
commit with a bit of code reflow.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
I don't plan to backport this to focal fwiw, so somebody should feel
free to pick that piece up if they want to.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
-
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Alex Murray (alexmurray)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in
because pbuilder is not "a necessary tool": there are several other
alternatives to it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936697
Title:
Unlisted dependency
To manage
Public bug reported:
It seems that starting from a few versions, syncpackage downloads .dscs,
stores them in ~, and leaves them there.
AFAIK there is no need to download anything to sync a package, as
launchpad should be able to handle everything through its API, so I'd
say the bug is threefold:
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in
that's because starting with bullseye the security suite is named
bullseye-security instead of bullseye/updates.
(not planning to write a patch myself in the short time, hopefully
somebody else will…)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in:
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1193941
Title:
import-bug-from-debian crashed with
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Bryce Harrington (bryce)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
This is the kind of things backports should be used for.
Are there no chances for a new backports team to appear and maintain those
pockets?
Or, have the backports work like in debian when regular maintainers/developers
upload and the team just checks the versioning is correct…
--
You
Sure, having reviewed now what was merged I'd say I have nothing to
complain about :)
Thank you for your work, and sorry for lagging behind!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
or.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1860456/+subscriptions
>
>
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapr
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, 1:55 pm Dan Streetman,
wrote:
> > I've seen such packages uploaded last year too
>
> that's unfortunate and quite bad.
>
Well, it's a feature, although one that does create confusion in many
situations. So it's probably good that very few people know of it ^^
I'd still
It's not just jaunty. I've seen such packages uploaded last year too.
Though I must say it's so rare that I forgot such packages existed…
And a flag such as `--no-verify-checksums` sounds a very bad idea to
have to me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
more specifically, it says
Checksum for akonadi_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz does not match.
DownloadError: File akonadi_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz could not be found
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
committed. https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev-
tools/commit/?id=f8fa865ab2a44e24260f889a3ada8a71421635be
** No longer affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Debian)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev-
tools/commit/?id=463d1f63a8d9784f6df072abce5af773ddad1c0c
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in:
The backports project in ubuntu is basically in a state where nobody is
working on it anymore. I can fix `requestbackport` to error out more
nicely in this case, but don't expect anything more.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to
It only *recommends* bzr, it doesn't depend on it.
However, what if I swap the recommends from "bzr | brz" to "brz | bzr"?
That way, it will pick bzr first.
Anyway, regardless of this, the latest version of bzr in debian is a
transitional package to brz, so it shouldn't really matter much
ubuntutools.version.Version which has strip_epoch() instead
> of debian.debian_support.Version.
> * Have ubuntu-dev-tools depend on the matching version of
> python3-ubuntutools.
>
> [ Scott Kitterman ]
> * Update requestsync to python3. Closes: #927147
>
> [ Mattia Rizzolo ]
>
I also disagree with this FFe. Despite it seems to be working for now I
would be suprised if no regressions pop up in a few days/weeks in
unstable.
@ddstreet: I'm still waiting on your MR(s)! The more you wait it's obvios the
more it gets harder to rebase… Can't you start with a few changes
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #938740
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938740
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938740
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools
Thank you indeed!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841127
Title:
pull-debian-source fails with "ImportError: No module named request"
To manage notifications about this
@ddstreet, yes please.
Also, the solution here is to port everything to py3-only, btw.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841127
Title:
pull-debian-source fails with
** Summary changed:
- reverse-depends does not work
+ reverse-depends: figure an alternative to qa.ubuntuwire.org/rdepends
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1625481
Title:
Then why is this against ubuntu-dev-tools? Maybe it should have been
against debootstrap? You also didn't specify what you are using to create
said chroot.
On Fri, 3 May 2019, 6:41 pm Brian Murray, wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.29-0ubuntu2) ...
> W:
Public bug reported:
Hi
So I'm now releasing version 0.166, since there is an RC bug.
ubuntu-archive-assistant is not being installed, and after I looked at
why, I saw you:
* didn't add the required build-deps (I fixed this myself)
* didn't add the script to setup.py
* the new module is not
I recommend you look at python3-argcomplete for this :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797290
Title:
no bash-completion for pull-lp-source (and probably others)
To
"pip install httplib2" is no workaround for a bug in a debian package
anyway.
And if you already know it's something that has to do with httplib2, why
did you assign this bug to ubuntu-dev-tools instead of python-httplib2
(which will be updated at some point, a contributor contacted me to
update
Any chance you could finish up that MR you did in the past, so I could
do that blind merge I was talking about?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779963
Title:
create
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314076
Title:
pbuilder-dist: Local archives
I am serious: you are right on being tired of waiting, so I'm asking you
to give me something I can straight merge and upload as-is to unstable.
It's clear I'm not going to review it as I hoped I would, so there is
little point in trying to defer it any more (and I kind of doubt you'll
find many
Well, now that bionic is done, and buster has still about an year to
come, let me just merge it and have you deal with whatever happens.. :)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance:
Most probably I can, yes. But it's not a quick thing, I need to find
some appropriate time to review.
BTW, even after merging some thing I'd prefer if you could stick around
and deal with upcoming bugs in pull-pkg in the next months.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nish Aravamudan (nacc)
** Branch linked: lp:~nacc/ubuntu-dev-tools/update-vcs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
ah, so this bug wasn't added to the changelog, and I noticed only now.
Pity, so I'm marking as released now already, I just synced it, so it's now
sitting in proposed, package version 0.158.
Thanks everybody who contributed!
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed
So let's do this, then. I'm going to upload to experimental, then sync
it
Although I have a question: I am totally unable to work with bzr behind
very basic stuff. Would anyone feel particularly sorry if I/we were to
move it to git? Now that launchpad supports it and so we could keep the
same
this is not a pbuilder bug:
pbuilder does not check if he should build the package or not at all, it just
hands the .dsc to dpkg-buildpackage after satisfying build-deps.
Interestingly enough, I trying to look up "in arch list or does not
match any arch wildcards" in codesearch.d.n, and the only
since the were no reply in more than one year I'm closing the bug report
(even to drop the bug from the list)
** Changed in: firehol (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
** Changed in: firehol (Ubuntu)
Assignee: MOTU (motu) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification
57 matches
Mail list logo
