Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] RPI ZERO W - wifi unstable

2021-09-09 Thread StevenEllis


Do you have a WIFI network with AP roaming enabled?

This caused a bunch of problems with my RasPI based systems and I had to
turn it off.



StevenEllis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=69979
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=115095

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix


Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] RPI ZERO W - wifi unstable

2021-09-07 Thread d6jg


Mellon wrote: 
> It may be worth remembering that packet loss is not ALWAYS a result of a
> network malfunction.
> 
> For example, if the device you are pinging is already working hard
> trying to do something else, that could be a reason for it to drop the
> ping request, rather than the ping request not making it there, or back,
> on the network. I'm not sure if there is any way to check CPU load, or
> any other process which may cause it to not respond promptly in Picore?
> 
> Is the ping response you provided an example of the Wifi going down
> regularly, or does it run like this and then you get nothing but Request
> timed out?

It's also worth remembering that the whole Pi range is very cheap and
quality control is, as a result, patchy. Another apparently identical Pi
Zero-W may work perfectly.



Jim
https://jukeradio.double6.net


VB2.4[/B] STORAGE *QNAP TS419P (NFS)
[B]Living Room* Joggler & Pi4/Khadas  -> Onkyo TXNR686 -> Celestion F20s

*Office* Joggler & Pi3 -> Denon RCD N8 -> Celestion F10s 
*Dining Room* SB Radio
*Bedroom (Bedside)* Pi Zero+DAC ->ToppingTP21 ->AKG Headphones
*Bedroom (TV) & Bathroom* SB Touch ->Denon AVR ->Mordaunt Short M10s +
Kef ceiling speakers
*Guest Room* Joggler > Topping Amp -> Wharfedale Modus Cubes

d6jg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=44051
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=115095

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix


Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] RPI ZERO W - wifi unstable

2021-09-07 Thread Mellon


pascal! wrote: 
> Hi,
> I have RPI ZERO W - with piCore
> piCorePlayer v7.0.0 | www v00011 | linux 5.4.83-pcpCore | piCore
> v12.0pCP | Squeezelite v1.9.9-1386-pCP
> And the WiFi goes down regurlarly and it is ok after the reboot for some
> minutes.
> My WiFi is quite good and I have another RPI ZERO W further from my wap
> that goes w/o any trouble
> Could you help oo solve this problem?
> > 
Code:

  >   > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=64
  > Request timed out.
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=64
  > Request timed out.
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=64
  > Request timed out.
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=692ms TTL=64
  > Request timed out.
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=64
  > Request timed out.
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=64
  > Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=64

> > 

It may be worth remembering that packet loss is not ALWAYS a result of a
network malfunction.

For example, if the device you are pinging is already working hard
trying to do something else, that could be a reason for it to drop the
ping request, rather than the ping request not making it there, or back,
on the network. I'm not sure if there is any way to check CPU load, or
any other process which may cause it to not respond promptly in Picore?

Is the ping response you provided an example of the Wifi going down
regularly, or does it run like this and then you get nothing but Request
timed out?



Mellon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=69383
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=115095

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix


Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] RPI ZERO W - wifi unstable

2021-09-06 Thread Greg Erskine


[WiFi Settings] > [Diagnostics] gives all (most) of the answers.


Code:


  Wifi:on
  SSID:GE2
  Password:xx
  Passphrase:  
  Security:WPA-PSK
  Country: 
  Hidden SSID: 0
  MAC address: 00:0f:13:28:20:85
  Uptime:  0 days 13 hours 2 minutes 32 seconds
  
  dmesg
  ===
  [5.262529] usb 1-1.3: New USB device found, idVendor=148f, 
idProduct=5370, bcdDevice= 1.01
  [5.262569] usb 1-1.3: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, 
SerialNumber=3
  [5.262591] usb 1-1.3: Product: 802.11 n WLAN
  [5.262609] usb 1-1.3: Manufacturer: Ralink
  [5.262631] usb 1-1.3: SerialNumber: 1.0
  .
  [   25.694152] usbcore: registered new interface driver rt2800usb
  .
  [   23.820161] cfg80211: Loading compiled-in X.509 certificates for 
regulatory database
  [   23.998036] cfg80211: Loaded X.509 cert 'sforshee: 00b28ddf47aef9cea7'
  .
  
  lsmod
  =
  Module  Size  Used by
  aes_arm 16384  4
  aes_generic 40960  1 aes_arm
  libaes  16384  2 aes_arm,aes_generic
  rt2800usb   28672  0
  rt2x00usb   24576  1 rt2800usb
  rt2800lib  126976  1 rt2800usb
  rt2x00lib   61440  3 rt2800lib,rt2800usb,rt2x00usb
  mac80211   819200  3 rt2800lib,rt2x00lib,rt2x00usb
  libarc4 16384  1 mac80211
  sha256_generic  16384  0
  libsha256   20480  1 sha256_generic
  cfg80211   774144  2 rt2x00lib,mac80211
  rfkill  32768  2 cfg80211
  raspberrypi_hwmon   16384  0
  
  wifi usb report (lsusb)
  ===
  Bus 001 Device 004: ID 148f:5370
  
  wpa supplicant configuration (wpa_supplicant.conf)
  ===
  # Maintained by piCorePlayer
  ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant
  ctrl_interface_group=staff
  update_config=1
  
  network={
#enc_ssid="GE2"
ssid="GExxx2"
psk=""
key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
auth_alg=OPEN
  }
  
  Extensions in onboot.lst (onboot.lst)
  ===
  pcp.tcz
  pcp-8.1.0-www.tcz
  firmware-atheros.tcz
  firmware-brcmwifi.tcz
  firmware-ralinkwifi.tcz
  firmware-rtlwifi.tcz
  firmware-rpi-wifi.tcz
  wireless_tools.tcz
  wpa_supplicant.tcz
  
  Wifi extensions installed
  =
  [ OK ] wireless_tools installed.
  [ OK ] wpa_supplicant installed.
  [ OK ] firmware-atheros installed.
  [ OK ] firmware-brcmwifi installed.
  [ OK ] firmware-ralinkwifi installed.
  [ OK ] firmware-rtlwifi installed.
  [ OK ] firmware-rpi-wifi installed.
  
  iwconfig
  
  wlan0 IEEE 802.11  ESSID:"GEwireless2"  
  Mode:Managed  Frequency:2.452 GHz  Access Point: B0:95:75:18:E6:E6   
  Bit Rate=65 Mb/s   Tx-Power=20 dBm   
  Retry short  long limit:2   RTS thr:off   Fragment thr:off
  Encryption key:off
  Power Management:off
  Link Quality=57/70  Signal level=-53 dBm  
  Rx invalid nwid:0  Rx invalid crypt:0  Rx invalid frag:0
  Tx excessive retries:418  Invalid misc:1860   Missed beacon:0
  
  
  ifconfig
  =
  wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0F:13:28:20:85  
  inet addr:192.168.1.108  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:5900946 errors:0 dropped:9529 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:817740 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
  RX bytes:8642565281 (8.0 GiB)  TX bytes:73854866 (70.4 MiB)
  
  
  iwlist
  
  Cell 02 - Address: B0:95:75:18:E6:E6
  Channel:9
  Frequency:2.452 GHz (Channel 9)
  Quality=57/70  Signal level=-53 dBm  
  Encryption key:on
  ESSID:"GEwireless2"
  Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 11 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s
  24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s
  Bit Rates:6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 48 Mb/s
  Mode:Master
  Extra:tsf=0044290cb11d
  Extra: Last beacon: 210ms ago
  IE: Unknown: 000B4745776972656C65737332
  IE: Unknown: 010882848B962430486C
  IE: Unknown: 030109
  IE: Unknown: 2A0104
  IE: Unknown: 32040C121860
  IE: IEEE 802.11i/WPA2 Version 1
  Group Cipher : CCMP
  Pairwise Ciphers (1) : CCMP
  Authentication Suites (1) : PSK
  IE: Unknown: 0B05070017
  IE: Unknown: 4605320801
  IE: Unknown: 2D1ABC091B01
  IE: Unknown: 3D1609001700
  IE: Unknown: 4A0E14000A002C01C800140005001900
  IE: Unknown: 7F0805000840
  IE: Unknown: DD090010180207000C
  IE: Unknown: DD180050F202010184000332273242225E0062212F00
  Cell 03 - Address: BC:30:D9:F5:63:45
  Channel:1
  Frequency:2.412 GHz (Channel 1)
  Quality=33/70  Signal level=-77 dBm  
  Encryption key:on
  ESSID:"TelstraF56343"
  Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 

Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] RPI ZERO W - wifi unstable

2021-09-06 Thread mooblie


...or neighbours on the same (or close) WiFi channel, of course.

Can you use something like InSSIDer (on Windows) to check the WiFi
channels in use in your vicinity: their strength and channel numbers?



Martin

mooblie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15378
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=115095

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix


Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] RPI ZERO W - wifi unstable

2021-09-06 Thread Greg Erskine


Paul Webster wrote: 
> Maybe if you move it even further away it will work even better!

Maybe! The quality and level did drop though.


Code:

Pos   QualityLevel
  1.  100   -11dBm
  2.  75-57dBm



I think the problems start to occur when the neighbours wifi router have
a higher quality and level than your own.



Greg Erskine's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7403
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=115095

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix


Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] RPI ZERO W - wifi unstable

2021-09-06 Thread mooblie


Aren't the clever PCB-based antennae on Pis _orientation_sensitive_?

I got better WiFi reception with a Pi (Pi3 actually) VERTICAL, rather
than horizontal.



Martin

mooblie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15378
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=115095

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix


Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] RPI ZERO W - wifi unstable

2021-09-06 Thread Paul Webster


Maybe if you move it even further away it will work even better!



Paul Webster
http://dabdig.blogspot.com
author of \"now playing\" plugins covering radio france (fip etc),
planetradio (bauer - kiss, absolute, scala, jazzfm etc), kcrw, supla
finland, abc australia, cbc/radio-canada and rte ireland

Paul Webster's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=105
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=115095

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix


Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] RPI ZERO W - wifi unstable

2021-09-06 Thread Greg Erskine


Moved 7 meters away thru 1 interior wall.


Code:

PING 192.168.1.52 (192.168.1.52): 56 data bytes
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=0 ttl=64 time=6.003 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=1 ttl=64 time=5.625 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=2 ttl=64 time=7.219 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=3 ttl=64 time=6.813 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=4 ttl=64 time=8.311 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=5 ttl=64 time=6.084 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=6 ttl=64 time=7.394 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=7 ttl=64 time=6.307 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=8 ttl=64 time=6.868 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=9 ttl=64 time=6.880 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=10 ttl=64 time=7.075 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=11 ttl=64 time=6.677 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=12 ttl=64 time=21.689 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=13 ttl=64 time=7.040 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=14 ttl=64 time=6.527 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=15 ttl=64 time=7.239 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=16 ttl=64 time=6.736 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=17 ttl=64 time=6.373 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=18 ttl=64 time=6.804 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=19 ttl=64 time=6.422 ms
  
  --- 192.168.1.52 ping statistics ---
  20 packets transmitted, 20 packets received, 0% packet loss
  round-trip min/avg/max = 5.625/7.504/21.689 ms




Greg Erskine's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7403
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=115095

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix


Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] RPI ZERO W - wifi unstable

2021-09-05 Thread Greg Erskine


There is a [Diagnostics] button on the [Wifi Settings] page.

The diagnostics log is then available under [Main Page] > [Diagnostics]
> [Logs].

Here is part of the log from my Raspberry Pi ZeroW (located 100mm from
wifi router).


Code:

PING 192.168.1.52 (192.168.1.52): 56 data bytes
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=0 ttl=64 time=6.927 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=1 ttl=64 time=6.457 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=2 ttl=64 time=6.993 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=3 ttl=64 time=6.285 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=4 ttl=64 time=7.810 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=5 ttl=64 time=6.660 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=6 ttl=64 time=6.867 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=7 ttl=64 time=7.274 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=8 ttl=64 time=7.289 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=9 ttl=64 time=8.026 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=10 ttl=64 time=18.112 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=11 ttl=64 time=47.287 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=12 ttl=64 time=6.841 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=13 ttl=64 time=6.244 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=14 ttl=64 time=6.797 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=15 ttl=64 time=7.531 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=16 ttl=64 time=7.160 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=17 ttl=64 time=13.358 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=18 ttl=64 time=12.290 ms
  64 bytes from 192.168.1.52: seq=19 ttl=64 time=6.615 ms
  
  --- 192.168.1.52 ping statistics ---
  20 packets transmitted, 20 packets received, 0% packet loss
  round-trip min/avg/max = 6.244/10.141/47.287 ms



No timeout errors or packet loss.



Greg Erskine's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7403
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=115095

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix


Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] RPI ZERO W - wifi unstable

2021-09-05 Thread John Finlay
Try swapping the two ZeroW locations to see if the problem is with the 
specific ZeroW or with the location.


John

On 9/5/21 8:37 AM, pascal! wrote:

Hi,
I have RPI ZERO W - with piCore
piCorePlayer v7.0.0 | www v00011 | linux 5.4.83-pcpCore | piCore
v12.0pCP | Squeezelite v1.9.9-1386-pCP
And the WiFi goes down regurlarly and it is ok after the reboot for some
minutes.
My WiFi is quite good and I have another RPI ZERO W further from my wap
that goes w/o any trouble
Could you help oo solve this problem?

Code:

 Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=64
   Request timed out.
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=64
   Request timed out.
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=64
   Request timed out.
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=692ms TTL=64
   Request timed out.
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=64
   Request timed out.
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=64
   Reply from 192.168.9.123: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=64




pascal!'s Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64395
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=115095

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix




___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix