Great, so with that support I need anyone that has committed to uPortal
in the past and is planning on contributing to uPortal in the future to
go and sign up for an account on GitHub. Once that is done please either
reply here or update the table on the wiki page with your account info:
This includes portlet contributions, or just to the core of uPortal?
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Eric Dalquist
eric.dalqu...@doit.wisc.edu wrote:
Great, so with that support I need anyone that has committed to uPortal in
the past and is planning on contributing to uPortal in the future to
This is just core uPortal. The only thing that is getting moved is
https://source.jasig.org/uPortal.
If individual portlet projects are interested in moving that is up to
them though the same username mapping info would likely be useful. I'm
going to stick the svn2git authors file in the
The GitHub migration vote currently stands at:
Binding:
3 +1
10
0 -0
NonBinding:
2 +1
00
0 -0
This is enough to pass by the project voting standards but I wanted to
bring this up one last time before scheduling the migration for
additional input. The 4.0.1
With the svn read-only mirror and the other discussions that have taken place
around governance, my vote is now a +1.
cheers,
Steve
On 30/09/2011, at 7:45 AM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
The GitHub migration vote currently stands at:
Binding:
3 +1
10
0 -0
NonBinding:
2 +1
I was originally a 0 on this issue; I think the primary committers by and
large won't have too much difficulty switching to git, but I shared some of
the earlier concerns about deployers depending on svn.
Now that this read-only mirror is possible, my vote is +1 as long as that
becomes a required
I had a bit of a chat about this and basically you are correct. There will be
efficiencies to be made where possible but little disruption to the self
governance of projects. So this won't be a barrier to any move to Git.
cheers,
Steve
On 12/09/2011, at 12:48 PM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
I'll
I've verified that we will be able to the keep the existing
https://source.jasig.org/uPortal svn data as a read-only mirror of the
git repository. Existing revision numbers will not change and commits on
the git side to the trunk and patches branches will automatically be
reflected back to the
I'll be interested to hear what you hear about the Jasig/Sakai stuff.
The talks we've had on the steering committee assumes that there will be
work to merge infrastructure but that project governance will remain
with the project steering committees, for example CAS3, mod_auth_cas,
and
I've moved the proposal into the wiki:
https://wiki.jasig.org/display/UPC/Git+Migration+Proposal
I tried to capture all of the concerns that have been raised in this
thread though they could use more flushing out, especially the
svn:externals issue.
The wiki page also links to a test
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Steve Swinsburg
steve.swinsb...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, as Bruce mentioned, local institutions may be using Subversion and
switching
this over could be a major barrier for community participation.
Assuming that 3.2.x remained on SVN and 4.0+ was on GIT, I'd end
I'd like to see uPortal's source code moved to git and hosted on GitHub.
There have been quite a few folks that have been working on uPortal 4,
uMobile or are otherwise interested that have asked about using git.
After looking into it a bit more I think it would be a very valuable
change for
+1
On 08/31/2011 02:26 PM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
I'd like to see uPortal's source code moved to git and hosted on
GitHub. There have been quite a few folks that have been working on
uPortal 4, uMobile or are otherwise interested that have asked about
using git. After looking into it a bit more
+/- 0
I think making this change so soon after the uPortal 4.0.0 release, is a
mistake. I think it would be better to let that release simmer for a
while to shake out if there were any major problems.
If this vote was to take place in a month, or at least 2 weeks after
some university was
+1
- Original Message -
From: Jen Bourey jennifer.bou...@gmail.com
To: uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:50:43 PM
Subject: Re: [uportal-dev] [VOTE] Move uPortal source to GitHub
+1
On Aug 31, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
I'd like to see
There's a command line interface, cool.
Does git have anything like svn:externals? A quick search brought up a
few pages that lead me to believe it might be an issue, though if a
read-only SVN repository is still part of the plan, maybe that covers
it. I'd have to do more research.
On Wed, Aug
I'm curious as yo why the concern about the closeness to the 4.0
release? I was actually thinking that doing the switch as soon as
possible after 4.0 would be better as it would give more time for
developers to get used to the change before a 4.0.1 is needed.
-Eric
On 8/31/11 3:05 PM, Cris J
Call me pessimistic, but... there seem to be two givens in the world of
software that concern me with this change at this time.
1) a .0 release is notoriously not perfect and is usually followed on
very quickly by a .1 release shortly after to fix some glaring bug that
will prevent most
Not officially voting just yet as I'd like to see this really thrashed out.
Switching to a different SCM system can isolate users who don't know how to use
it. Git is complex. Much more so than Subversion. It may be more powerful but
that doesn't mean a lot to the average user who wants to fix
19 matches
Mail list logo
