On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:54 -0700, Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) wrote:
May be a different way to ask this question is would it make sense to
have some of the header files associated with the message/errr
definitions under the upstart directory LGPLed.
This would make it simpler for people
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 7:51 AM
To: Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi)
Cc: Matthias Urlichs; upstart-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: RE: Upstart Client Library
Importance: High
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:54 -0700, Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) wrote:
May be a different way to ask this question
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 08:20 -0700, Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) wrote:
If I had a proprietary program and wanted to talk to Upstart.
Licence your program under the GPL.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
: Friday, June 13, 2008 7:51 AM
To: Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi)
Cc: Matthias Urlichs; upstart-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: RE: Upstart Client Library
Importance: High
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:54 -0700, Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) wrote:
May be a different way to ask this question is would
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/12 Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
As Garret Cooper mentioned earlier, my team at Cisco is thinking of
working with Upstart as a process manager.
One of the questions that have come up
to this effort.
Sarvi
-Original Message-
From: Michael Biebl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 4:32 PM
To: Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi)
Cc: upstart-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: Upstart Client Library
Importance: High
2008/6/12 Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi
Hi Sarvi,
This sounds like Upstart is proposing a hard dependendency on D-Bus. Is
this really necessary. Has the impact on small/embedded platforms been
considered.
please lets not have this discussion again. D-Bus is perfectly fine for
embedded systems. Actually having more than one IPC is
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi):
This sounds like Upstart is proposing a hard dependendency on D-Bus.
It proposes a hard dependency on the d-bus library and protocol.
(There needs to be *some* way of talking to init ... and the d-bus
protocol seems to be reasonably
Hi Matthias,
This sounds like Upstart is proposing a hard dependendency on D-Bus.
It proposes a hard dependency on the d-bus library and protocol.
(There needs to be *some* way of talking to init ... and the d-bus
protocol seems to be reasonably sane for doing this kind of thing)
this
