On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:54 -0700, Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) wrote:
May be a different way to ask this question is would it make sense to
have some of the header files associated with the message/errr
definitions under the upstart directory LGPLed.
This would make it simpler for people
and enum definitions.
If those shared header files (shared between the GPLed Upstart Init and
LPGLed Upstart Client library) are licensed under GPL, doesn't that
contaminate the LPL licensing of the Client library?
Sarvi
-Original Message-
From: Scott James Remnant [mailto:[EMAIL
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 08:20 -0700, Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) wrote:
If I had a proprietary program and wanted to talk to Upstart.
Licence your program under the GPL.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Upstart Init code so that they share a common
message structure and enum definitions.
If those shared header files (shared between the GPLed Upstart Init and
LPGLed Upstart Client library) are licensed under GPL, doesn't that
contaminate the LPL licensing of the Client library?
The D-Bus
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/12 Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
As Garret Cooper mentioned earlier, my team at Cisco is thinking of
working with Upstart as a process manager.
One of the questions that have come up
to this effort.
Sarvi
-Original Message-
From: Michael Biebl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 4:32 PM
To: Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi)
Cc: upstart-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: Upstart Client Library
Importance: High
2008/6/12 Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi
Hi Sarvi,
This sounds like Upstart is proposing a hard dependendency on D-Bus. Is
this really necessary. Has the impact on small/embedded platforms been
considered.
please lets not have this discussion again. D-Bus is perfectly fine for
embedded systems. Actually having more than one IPC is
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi):
This sounds like Upstart is proposing a hard dependendency on D-Bus.
It proposes a hard dependency on the d-bus library and protocol.
(There needs to be *some* way of talking to init ... and the d-bus
protocol seems to be reasonably
Hi Matthias,
This sounds like Upstart is proposing a hard dependendency on D-Bus.
It proposes a hard dependency on the d-bus library and protocol.
(There needs to be *some* way of talking to init ... and the d-bus
protocol seems to be reasonably sane for doing this kind of thing)
this
Hi,
As Garret Cooper mentioned earlier, my team at Cisco is thinking
of working with Upstart as a process manager.
One of the questions that have come up with respect to a client library
to control Upstart.
There is a need for a process to talk/listen to the UpstartInit process
for the
10 matches
Mail list logo
