I'm attempting to play some music on iPad after selecting it with
mobilePickMedia.
Selecting it is fine and returns a line in the form:
ipod-library://item/item.mp3?id=-3639534672740601105
Now, later on I try to play this using mobilePlaySoundOnChannel but I get the
error:
could not play
Here:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ja47l87gg87sn0q/AAAIj99kEQVOb8ev3jz8C5ORa?dl=0
Richmond.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
If you mean SuperPick.Livecode, I like it too. I was working in a similar vein
with more of Crayon Name orientation, since I tend to use the Crayon Palette.
Have you tried putting everything in the scrollBarDrag handler instead of the
MouseUp handler? Works great on my machine.
Roger
On Dec
What I meant to note is that in the various “Preferences” panels that have
tabs, like the “Sounds” panel (I’m still on Mavericks), the currently selected
tab (what I called the “active tab”) is dark and the unselected tabs are white,
or lighter in color. Whereas on Safari (an Apple app also)
On 10/12/14 15:33, Roger Guay wrote:
If you mean SuperPick.Livecode, I like it too. I was working in a similar vein
with more of Crayon Name orientation, since I tend to use the Crayon Palette.
Have you tried putting everything in the scrollBarDrag handler instead of the
MouseUp handler?
Anyone here remember that way back when (maybe OS 7) if you set your Mac's
calendar far in the future, maybe 2020, the crayon picker would change so
the crayons' tips were worn down?
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 10/12/14 15:33, Roger Guay
That’s cute. I didn’t know that, but in fact, they’ve been worn flat!
On Dec 10, 2014, at 7:40 AM, Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone here remember that way back when (maybe OS 7) if you set your Mac's
calendar far in the future, maybe 2020, the crayon picker would change so
the
THAT is very useful. I will have to go back and rethink some things.
Bob S
On Dec 7, 2014, at 18:30 , Peter Haworth p...@lcsql.com wrote:
Thanks Scott, hidePalettes=false did the trick. Looks like raisePalettes
only affects how palettes are displayed in relation to other windows within
By that reasoning, Livecode should recreate all the API’s Apple provides,
rolling their own. And then we will get to gripe when they don’t work anymore
after updating our OS. C’mon guys. For better or worse, ALL OS developers have
to continue to innovate. If Apple’s OS troubles you, you can
Are you saying locking messages before quitting prevents the Save dialog from
presenting? I didn’t know that.
Bob S
On Dec 8, 2014, at 09:29 , Ray r...@linkit.com wrote:
I just issue the command quit. You might consider saving first or, if you
don't want any interruptions, locking
Sweet!
Bob S
On Dec 9, 2014, at 09:46 , J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:
That only happens in the IDE, you can lock messages before quitting. Or,
what I usually do from the message box: delete this stack. (Or you can use
the menu option to remove from memory.) Then a
Bob Sneidar wrote:
By that reasoning, Livecode should recreate all the API’s Apple
provides, rolling their own.
In a sense, that's what LiveCode opens up for us with Open Language, a
chance to use OS APIs directly.
And smartly, if we choose to use APIs Apple later deprecates, it's up to
us
Geoff Canyon wrote:
It's been a long time since I saw anything on the syntax extension
functionality, but my recollection was that it was supposed to be the
all-singing, all-dancing wonder of the universe -- meaning that if I wanted
to use a C-like dot-notation (I don't, usually) that would be
New version now available.
If anybody asks: YES: I ripped-off Apple's Crayon Colour picker.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ja47l87gg87s ... C5ORa?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ja47l87gg87sn0q/AAAIj99kEQVOb8ev3jz8C5ORa?dl=0
File: superpick.livecode.zip
I was careful to rip-off the images from
On 10/12/14 17:40, Geoff Canyon wrote:
Anyone here remember that way back when (maybe OS 7) if you set your Mac's
calendar far in the future, maybe 2020, the crayon picker would change so
the crayons' tips were worn down?
After what I just did:
On 10/12/14 19:17, Bob Sneidar wrote:
By that reasoning, Livecode should recreate all the API’s Apple provides, rolling
their own. And then we will get to gripe when they don’t work anymore after updating
our OS. C’mon guys. For better or worse, ALL OS developers have to continue to
innovate.
On 10/12/14 20:07, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Bob Sneidar wrote:
By that reasoning, Livecode should recreate all the API’s Apple
provides, rolling their own.
In a sense, that's what LiveCode opens up for us with Open Language, a
chance to use OS APIs directly.
And smartly, if we choose to use
Richmond wrote:
On 10/12/14 20:07, Richard Gaskin wrote:
And smartly, if we choose to use APIs Apple later deprecates,
it's up to us rather than RunRev to update our scripts to
conform with Apple's policy-du-jour.
This is why it might not be a bad thing if Livecode can roll its own
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a more-recent-and-detailed spec that confirms or denies this? I'm
(non)patiently awaiting the ability to create inline if statements, default
parameter values, and multiple assignments.
put (if x = y then 6 else
On 10/12/2014 07:32, Geoff Canyon wrote:
Is there a more-recent-and-detailed spec that confirms or denies this? I'm
(non)patiently awaiting the ability to create inline if statements, default
parameter values, and multiple assignments.
put (if x = y then 6 else 7) into z
function getColumn
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com
wrote:
The main goal of OL is two-fold: to provide OS API access, and to allow
custom components (libraries, widgets, etc.) to be integrated as smoothly
in usage as engine-native routines and objects.
I don't
Geoff Canyon wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
The main goal of OL is two-fold: to provide OS API access, and
to allow custom components (libraries, widgets, etc.) to be
integrated as smoothly in usage as engine-native routines and
objects.
I don't remember
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com
wrote:
If longevity of language features is inversely proportionate to their
value, C must be a total waste of time. :)
Ha -- of course I'm not suggesting that; anyone who wants to take away
repeat for each or URL
I have a group that has its innerShadow property set. Within it are two
rectangles that do not have their innerShadow property set but I can see an
innerShadow on them, presumably because they are inheriting it from the
containing rectangle.
I want to get rid of the innerShadow on the rectangles
I might be wrong, but I don’t think you can, as described. Applying the effect
to a group will cause the effect to appear on everything in the group, if
there’s nothing else in the group that’s larger than the two rectangles. If
you have empty space surrounding the two rectangles, you might be
Pete,
Try setting the opaque property of the parent group to true.
- Eric
On Dec 10, 2014, at 2:40 PM, Peter Haworth p...@lcsql.com wrote:
I have a group that has its innerShadow property set. Within it are two
rectangles that do not have their innerShadow property set but I can see an
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically any time a significant number of developers are expressing a
single concept in more than one line, that's an opportunity to create a
simpler, more powerful syntax. You know I could list hundreds of
possibilities,
I’m only going off of posts made by Richmond over the years. (That’s probably
only funny to Richmond). ;-)
Bob S
On Dec 10, 2014, at 10:07 , Richard Gaskin
ambassa...@fourthworld.commailto:ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
For better or worse, ALL OS developers have to continue to innovate.
That makes my toes curl reading it.
Bob S
On Dec 10, 2014, at 14:19 , Geoff Canyon
gcan...@gmail.commailto:gcan...@gmail.com wrote:
How about
making item take an argument?
put item(|) 2 to 3 of item(;) 2 of
test|this|thing;one|more|string|here;final|string
puts more|string
Hi Eric,
I tried that but it made the the combination of the group's innerShadow and
being opaque made the group look weird (sorry, hard to explain).
Pete
lcSQL Software http://www.lcsql.com
Home of lcStackBrowser http://www.lcsql.com/lcstackbrowser.html and
SQLiteAdmin
It is a major %$*# if one authors a piece of software that requires
data entry via a USB peripheral other than a mouse or a keyboard
(gamepads, footpedals, scanners) as the end-user normally has to install
drivers and so on before using your software.
As almost all USB peripherals are
31 matches
Mail list logo
