Re: Set the fillGradient ....

Yes it is. > On Aug 31, 2016, at 6:49 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: > > Is the noGradientYet graphic opaque? > > > Scott Rossi > Creative Director > Tactile Media UX/UI Design > >> On Aug 31, 2016, at 6:43 PM, Roger Guay wrote: >> >> Why does this not work?

Extremely OT: Transceiver for sale

Hey all, sorry for the off topic, but I figure the amount of brains and wide range of interests in this group.. I might as well see if anyone wants some electronics. (if not I'll ebay them) I recently bought a used ambulance (yes really) and am modifying things for disability camping. It came

Re: Set the fillGradient ....

Is the noGradientYet graphic opaque? Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media UX/UI Design > On Aug 31, 2016, at 6:43 PM, Roger Guay wrote: > > Why does this not work? > > Set the fillGradient of grc “noGradientYet" to the fillGradient of grc > “NiceGradient”. > >

Set the fillGradient ....

Why does this not work? Set the fillGradient of grc “noGradientYet" to the fillGradient of grc “NiceGradient”. Something happens . . . indeed the object browser seems to show that they have the same gradient, yet they don’t! Probably something simple, again. LC 8.0.2 and Mac Thanks,

Re: Standalone stops running

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > So I always use a-z, A_Z, 0-9 _ and - and NOTHING ELSE. I don't even like > using spaces if I can help it. > I allow periods, but not hyphens. I've used things over the year where they have meaning . . . --

Re: Standalone stops running

Again I cite a basic principle in file naming: No special characters, no spaces. I know that for many languages an umlat is not considered a special character, but a computer doesn't know anything about that. Now maybe it works and you don't have a problem. Might work for years, and then you do

Re: postgres "serial primary key" recycling values

I think I see what is happening. The nextval() in postgres does *not* consider the numbers in use in the sequence; I thought it had. So adding put "ALTER SEQUENCE " & dhtbl_dbtr & "_unqKy_seq RESTART WITH 1001;" & cr after dcmd Instead of inserting ckCap solves the problem. I tried

postgres "serial primary key" recycling values

I create my table with *CREATE TABLE dhdbt_testy_xxiv___001 (unqKy SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, ktyp * * CHAR(1), kywd VARCHAR(50) UNIQUE, usr VARCHAR(20), tstmp TIMESTAMP WITH * * TIME ZONE, scr TEXT, dltd BOOLEAN, cmd TEXT );* *ALTER TABLE dhdbt_testy_xxiv___001 OWNER TO hawk ;*

Re: Standalone stops running

Hallo Richard, > Am 31.08.2016 um 18:11 schrieb Hillen Richard : > > Hello, > > in the beginning of this year I wrote on OS X 10.6. with Livecode 8.0.1 a > splash stack (stack main and substack Data), which runs fine in the > delveloper environment and as standalone. >

Re: Standalone stops running

Hello Richard - I won't have time this morning to dissect the stack itself, but I have a hunch that may be useful: Your openstack handler refers to the "Data" stack by short name only, but it's a separate stack file, yes? That would require it to be listed in the stackFiles property of the

Standalone stops running

Hello, in the beginning of this year I wrote on OS X 10.6. with Livecode 8.0.1 a splash stack (stack main and substack Data), which runs fine in the delveloper environment and as standalone. In the last week I changed a litte bit in the Data substack, using OS X 10.6.11, Livecode 8.0.2 again.

Re: Missing a chance

Lagi Pittas wrote: > Richard > > You totally missed my point. It seems we missed each other's points. Mine was about ROI. > First off if the website is taking 24 hours of the developers time > then there is a problem. I went on the main site and there was a link > to the documentation

Re: Missing a chance

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Richmond wrote: > her Mum doesn't want to watch it alone because she takes all of it > literally and needs my wife to hold her hand whenever some gets shot, ends > up in prison, Joey, have you ever . . . :) -- Dr. Richard E.

Re: LC performance change from Win 7 to Win 10

I'm running Windows 10 Pro native on a workstation*. -- Tom * 64-bit, Intel Xeon CPU 3.19 GHz, 12 GB memory Mike Kerner wrote > Are you running 10 in parallels, or on a native pc? 10 is slower than 7 > in > many cases, and the new Parallels is slower than the last one, in many > cases.

Re: LC performance change from Win 7 to Win 10

Mike Kerner wrote: > ...the new Parallels is slower than the last one Bug fix: https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads Mark Wieder turned me on to VirtualBox several years ago, and it restored sessions soo much faster than Parallels I switched everything over that day and never

Re: LC performance change from Win 7 to Win 10

Are you running 10 in parallels, or on a native pc? 10 is slower than 7 in many cases, and the new Parallels is slower than the last one, in many cases. Patches from both have not fixed everything. On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 7:42 PM, tbodine wrote: > Thanks Monte

Re: Missing a chance

On 31.08.2016 12:46, Lagi Pittas wrote: Richard You totally missed my point. First off if the website is taking 24 hours of the developers time then there is a problem. I went on the main site and there was a link to the documentation yesterday - and guess what page not found - it happens

Multiple Property Inspector Instances for the same object - Bug or Feature ?

Hi all, Today we came across this report, and we are on a discussion on whether this is a bug or a feature. What do you think? http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18291 Should we allow this behavior, given of course that there are no syncing issues? A quick test shows that there are no

Re: Missing a chance

Richard You totally missed my point. First off if the website is taking 24 hours of the developers time then there is a problem. I went on the main site and there was a link to the documentation yesterday - and guess what page not found - it happens all the time, I given up even bothering to