As a warning for others, fastJSON is not directly interchangeable with
easyJSON.
I'm using a big array that has a couple levels of numeric keys before you
get to the text keys. When fastJSON converts the array to JSON it throws
out the numeric keys and just turns everything into a list.
I don't t
On Jan 7, 2017 4:01 PM, "Richard Gaskin via use-livecode" <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> Malte Brill wrote:
>
> > I also am a stupid GIT. Way over my head. That said - can’t this be
> > somehow automated so that one could download nightly builds?
>
> While nightly builds can be a good
We are facing an old bug in various stacks. Some are very old stacks that have
moved forward over time from as far back as 5.* with standalone builder (SAB)
settings revised along the way until we are up to Sierra and LC 8.1.2 where
attempts to make a standalone fail due to an old bug where the
Malte Brill wrote:
> I also am a stupid GIT. Way over my head. That said - can’t this be
> somehow automated so that one could download nightly builds?
While nightly builds can be a good practice for many projects, LC is
unusually complex, and requires a LOT of time to run their build system.
I also am a stupid GIT. Way over my head. That said - can’t this be somehow
automated so that one could download nightly builds? If it could I would be
willing to throw in a couple of Euros to make that happen (to be honest, not
before the end of April though and most likely not enough Euros to
Thank you.
On 1/7/17 7:13 pm, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
Richmond Mathewson wrote:
> How about an impatient chap whose GANTT chart of his 4th SDLC has
> been completely thrown out of kilter owing to a bug (19045) in
> existing builds of LiveCode, knowing that that bug has been sorte
Richmond Mathewson wrote:
> How about an impatient chap whose GANTT chart of his 4th SDLC has
> been completely thrown out of kilter owing to a bug (19045) in
> existing builds of LiveCode, knowing that that bug has been sorted
> out but that the next official RC build is waiting on at least
> an
Um, a broad "thang" . . . I've never measured one myself.
How about an impatient chap whose GANTT chart of his 4th SDLC has been
completely thrown out of
kilter owing to a bug (19045) in existing builds of LiveCode, knowing
that that bug has been sorted
out but that the next official RC build i
Richmond Mathewson wrote:
> I would be extremely grateful if someone in the know could post
> a recipe for simple souls like myself to build a LiveCode "thang" from
> github.
"Thang" is very broad. Stack? External? Engine? What do you want to
build?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World System
I would be extremely grateful if someone in the know could post
a recipe for simple souls like myself to build a LiveCode "thang" from
github.
Richmond.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsu
I thought the theory was that getting lots of people to use the open
source version would lead
to all sorts of benefits to LiveCode:
1. A certain proportion of O.S. users would contribute with bug reports
and so on.
2. A certain proportion of O.S. users would, in due course, pay for a
commer
11 matches
Mail list logo
