Hi Brahmanathaswami,
This probably means that LC does not find the android SDK. Go to LC
Preferences -> Mobile Support and make sure the path to android SDK is set
and valid.
Best
Panos
On 1 Apr 2017 06:25, "Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode" <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
la
last week thinks were flow well in Mac OS X Sierra w LC 9DP5
I could plug in my Nexus 5 via USB, check for Android build in the SB settings
and ti would appear in the menu as a test target and I could deploy very fast.
in fact that was so much more convenient than iOS builds that I didn't even
rc1? The latest one on the website is DP6
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:48 PM, hh via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> I can't sleep. The new LC 9.0.0-rc1 features make me crazy.
> Close to infinity. Converting all my stacks since two hours.
>
>
It is apparently already next month where you are.
> On Mar 31, 2017, at 6:48 PM, hh via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> I can't sleep. The new LC 9.0.0-rc1 features make me crazy.
> Close to infinity. Converting all my stacks since two hours.
>
___
use
I can't sleep. The new LC 9.0.0-rc1 features make me crazy.
Close to infinity. Converting all my stacks since two hours.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscript
Here: http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=29069
Richmond.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your response, very helpful.
Unfortunately I don't know what the filesystem of the volume with the files is
- this is a client's network, and they set up a VM in the DMZ for me to work
on, with this network share mounted - but I've no idea what the fileserver is.
The thin
However, "(baseConvert: bad destination base)" does not help much.
This mainly because your example was wrong.
I tried this:
put baseConvert(codePointToNum("&"), 10, 16) because your syntax was
the wrong way round,
BUT it go "all stuffy" about the codePointToum, so I did this:
put codePoin
Sorry guys I didn't specified the stack format version, it was 7.
Thanks for all testers. The test was very valuable for me, because I found
that the sequence of MAC addresses wasn't the same as my old function
produced on some machines. I have optimized my code now to get the same
sequence.
Thanks
In the standalone builder, select the Bug Reports button and check the Include
Error Reporting Dialog checkbox. Check at least the Allow user to email report
and put your email address in. When an error occurs it will include the line of
code that crashed the app, as well as the object the code
Hi there
I’ve got two a standalones made from the same stack, one standalone made with
LC 7.1.3, the other one with LC 8.1.3. When I want to finish the two apps, it
works fine with both standalones as long as I hit the red button of the
decorations.
With the standalone made from LC 7.1.3 it a
On 2017-03-31 15:36, Francis Nugent Dixon via use-livecode wrote:
Sorry Tiemo,
Got a message that "MyMACs.livecode" is not a stack - can't open it
with LiveCode
I wonder why ?
Using - 10.12 Sierra with LiveCode 5.5.
It is a 7.0 format stackfile... The error message in older LiveCode
version
Stackfile change, the stack must be in a later format.
I saved a copy with the older stack file version, hopefully it won't break
any code (it shouldn't.)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ca3yqa9gvvtrsd4/myMACsStackfilever2_4.livecode?dl=0
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Francis Nugent Dixon via use-li
Sorry Tiemo,
Got a message that "MyMACs.livecode" is not a stack - can't open it with
LiveCode
I wonder why ?
Using - 10.12 Sierra with LiveCode 5.5.
Best Regards
Francis
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:28:59 +0200
> From: "Tiemo Hollmann TB"
> To: "LiveCode User Liste senden"
> S
Thanks for a very prompt and useful reply!
Richmond.
On 31/03/17 13:33, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
On 2017-03-31 12:12, Richmond via use-livecode wrote:
So, if I do something like this:
*put the codePointToNum("§")*
I will get the Unicode address of that character as a Decimal n
On 2017-03-31 13:20, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
Hi Ben,
This might be of interest:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms724290(v=vs.85).aspx
On 2017-03-31 12:48, Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode wrote:
The standalone, built from LC 6.7.11, is running on a Win
Hi Ben,
This might be of interest:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms724290(v=vs.85).aspx
On 2017-03-31 12:48, Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode wrote:
The standalone, built from LC 6.7.11, is running on a Windows machine
(VM running Windows Server 2008 R2) in London, wh
I have an interesting situation. The detailed files is reporting a LIE in
modification dates.
I have a standalone app which outputs a report including the modification date
of a bunch of files (and subsequently interprets and acts on it).
On Monday, a BAD THING happened at my client's side. O
On 2017-03-31 12:12, Richmond via use-livecode wrote:
So, if I do something like this:
*put the codePointToNum("§")*
I will get the Unicode address of that character as a Decimal number.
How can I get it as a Hex number?
Two options - you can use baseConvert:
put baseConvert(10, 16, codep
So, if I do something like this:
*put the codePointToNum("§")*
I will get the Unicode address of that character as a Decimal number.
How can I get it as a Hex number?
Richmond.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit
On 2017-03-31 10:28, Tiemo Hollmann TB via use-livecode wrote:
Thank you for your help
Mine is forthcoming - btw, I suggest anyone doing this makes sure they
only send the results to Tiemo privately - unless you want all your Mac
addresses in a public forum :)
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Ma
Hello,
I am replacing an old very slow function (netstat) to retrieve MAC addresses
with another fast function (networksetup). I am replacing a part of a
licensing system in a live program out in the market, so I have to be sure,
to get exactly the same result from the new function. It has to be t
22 matches
Mail list logo
