Re: HTTPD Server Post Requests work ........about half the time

Ok..so the problem was that in my request processing, I was outputting certain data into the message box...duuuh.which was obviously a blocking operation and was blocking something in the background processes. went 100/100 as soon as i took it out. thank you gentlemen. On Mon, May 7, 2018

Re: HTTPD Server Post Requests work ........about half the time

i will do that thanks MonteI must understand the cause of this before i go into production ... otherwise I'll never sleep again :) On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Monte Goulding via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Andre I think that should only be an issue if your

Re: HTTPD Server Post Requests work ........about half the time

Andre I think that should only be an issue if your number of requests * time per request > client timeout. Tom probably the best place to start is some logs of the requests and responses on both client and server. Cheers Monte > On 8 May 2018, at 11:28 am, Andre Garzia via use-livecode >

Re: HTTPD Server Post Requests work ........about half the time

Remember that LC is using a single thread and that script execution is blocking, so, if your server is busy doing work to respond to a request, then it will probably not acknowledge an incoming request at the same time. Or at least that was true for my RevHTTPd version... On Mon, May 7, 2018 at

Re: Inclusions bug in LC9?

Wouldn't that be handy? Bob S > On May 7, 2018, at 13:34 , Paul Dupuis via use-livecode > wrote: > > Although now that I think about it, even if you have LC set to Search > for Inclusions, shouldn't you be able to click on the Inclusions tab to > SEE what

Re: Inclusions bug in LC9?

Although now that I think about it, even if you have LC set to Search for Inclusions, shouldn't you be able to click on the Inclusions tab to SEE what Inclusions the search found? On 5/7/2018 4:30 PM, Paul Dupuis via use-livecode wrote: > NEVER MIND > > I had a brain fart and forgot about

Re: Inclusions bug in LC9?

NEVER MIND I had a brain fart and forgot about the radio button to switch from searching for inclusions to selecting them on the General tab. On 5/7/2018 4:24 PM, Paul Dupuis via use-livecode wrote: > RECIPE (Under Windows 8.1, LC9.0.0) > > Open LC. Create a new Untitled stack, default size.

Inclusions bug in LC9?

RECIPE (Under Windows 8.1, LC9.0.0) Open LC. Create a new Untitled stack, default size. Save the stack as "Test.livecode". Select "Standalone Application Settings..." from the file menu OBSERVE: The "Inclusions" tab is disabled (greyed out) I assumed at first this was because the stack has no

Re: Has Anyone Got A Directory \\\"Walker\\\" Available

I think we may be in the territory of pre-mature optimization. There is going to be a bit more overhead creating a copy-on-write object than a pass-by-reference object, but the real gains (over the old way) are going to be seen with objects that are “large”. If you run a profiler and need to

Re: Background Long IDs

Not by the engine. There may be a better way, but the code is in button 1003. _getObjectLongName starts on line 421. I built the long ID on line 171. On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 2:24 PM Richard Gaskin via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Brian Milby wrote: > > > The end goal is

Re: LC on Windows - slow for others or just me?

Andy, these specifics were very helpful: > Must agree that 9 series is slower on Windows 10 than previous > versions. > > Win 10 pro 64 bit > > Observations > > 1. Instances of Livecode do not always shut down correctly and have > to be closed via the Task Manager.Failure to notice this can

Re: Background Long IDs

Brian Milby wrote: > The end goal is to enable a binary stack to have the scripts within > tracked via GitHub. A closely related goal is to enable editing of > said scripts via an external editor. Script only stacks are not the > way that I want to go for these projects (they are distributed

Re: Has Anyone Got A Directory \\\"Walker\\\" Available

Mark Wieder wrote: > On 05/06/2018 02:42 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: > >> Did copy-on-write get changed in v9, or is the scope of its effects >> just more limited than I had understood it to be? > > I'm still at the point of not trusting copy-on-write yet, but I think > you're

HTTPD Server Post Requests work ........about half the time

Hi folks, so spent the last 2 days working on getting my client to talk to a simple service I created taking advantage of the httpd library in v9. Everything works fine. half the time. literally the request is identical each time but the result differs. the content type is set to

[ANN] This Week in LiveCode 127

Hi all, Read about new developments in LiveCode open source and the open source community in today's edition of the "This Week in LiveCode" newsletter! Read issue #127 here: https://goo.gl/S6tLAK This is a weekly newsletter about LiveCode, focussing on what's been going on in and around

Multiple Quicktime driven MP3/MP4 Track Player

Klaus, "PlayStopped" - Ich kannte diesen Befehl nicht ! Es sollte den Trick machen. Vielen Dank, Klaus. -Francis -- *** And for those who don't grab .. "PlayStopped" - I did not know this command ! It should do the trick. Thank you, Klaus.