Found something very interesting and I think it may be a bug (at least an
anomaly)...
if you rename a symbolic link to a folder, the folder that is pointed to is
renamed vice the link
consider the following (-> denotes a symbolic link)
~/tmp/
~/tmp2 -> ./tmp/
rename "~/tmp2" "~/tmp3"
results
Finally working on the actual code in the IDE and discovered that there is
a failure in a different spot than I thought. "there is a file" returns
false on symbolic links. So my initial solution is going to need some more
work.
Also, file copy failures are not propagated up the call chain.
What Jacque said;
Originally you had built the standalone with LC 9.0.1 rc1 (and installed it
in the device), so its manifest had targetSDKversion=26.
Then you built a new one with LC 9.0.0, so it had its targetSDKversion
equal to the minSDKversion, as specified in the standalone settings, and
It could be because 9.0.1 sets the target version in the manifest to 26
and 9.0 sets it to the same version as the one you select in the
dropdown menu in standalone settings. If you've truly removed the old
app completely I wouldn't think it would matter, but apparently Android
stores some
Ok nice, I know what happened. I will post a detailed msg in a while as I
am not in a computer now.
Best,
Panos
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018, 21:05 Dan Friedman wrote:
> Odd… I uninstalled the app from the Android phone and re-installed it.
> Now it installed. Go figure.
>
> -Dan
>
>
> On 7/21/18,
Odd… I uninstalled the app from the Android phone and re-installed it. Now it
installed. Go figure.
-Dan
On 7/21/18, 12:53 PM, "use-livecode on behalf of panagiotis merakos via
use-livecode" wrote:
Can you try setting the app identifier in the standalone settings to
something
Can you try setting the app identifier in the standalone settings to
something unique that definitely is not already installed in the device? Is
it possible that you have installed an app with the same identifier
(com.yourcompany.yourapp) in the device, which was built with 9.0.1 rc1?
On Sat, Jul
Hello Dan,
What is the version of Android the device is running? I am wondering if you
get this error because of the value of the targetSdkVersion set in the
manifest.
Best,
Panos
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018, 20:32 Ray via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Are you having this
Are you having this problem only on other users' Macs? If so then
you've run into the same Apple induced problem I posted about a month
ago. It only happens when you distribute to others using MacOS 10.12 or
higher.
On 7/21/2018 2:29 PM, Dan Friedman via use-livecode wrote:
So, I tried to
So, I tried to revert back to 9.0.0 because my client is pretty pissed that
we’ve missed our deadline. Unfortunately, when I save as standalone in 9.0.0,
and try to install it on a device, the device reports that “the package appears
to be corrupt”. I tried changing the build number (as
Brian,
I can definitely test it out. I wouldn’t worry about symbolic links outside
the folder right now. I don’t believe it affects .frameworks.
--
Trevor DeVore
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:24 AM Brian Milby via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Doing a little digging on
Brian-
Here's the code I use in PowerTools to determine in a cross-platform way
whether a filespec is a file or a folder. The Windows code is pretty
stupid, just looking at the file extension, but I couldn't think of a
better way to figure it out. HTH.
/**
*
Doing a little digging on this.
I'm pretty sure this impacts iOS in the same was as MacOS.
private command __revSBCopyFolder
User and group is copied if MacOS, but not Linux
private command __revSBCopyFile
Probably good that links are handled as files, because they technically are.
Prior to
thank you gentlemen!
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Klaus major-k via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> > Am 21.07.2018 um 15:31 schrieb Tom Glod via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>:
> >
> > Hi Folks, I failed to think my stack through ahead of
Hi Tom,
> Am 21.07.2018 um 15:31 schrieb Tom Glod via use-livecode
> :
>
> Hi Folks, I failed to think my stack through ahead of time and forgot to
> add a shared group to my first card before I made the other cards.
>
> Is there a way to do that afterwards? and have a new group shared on
>From the object menu, select place group.
It can be done in code if you have too many to do by hand.
On Jul 21, 2018, 8:32 AM -0500, Tom Glod via use-livecode
, wrote:
> Hi Folks, I failed to think my stack through ahead of time and forgot to
> add a shared group to my first card before I made
Hi Folks, I failed to think my stack through ahead of time and forgot to
add a shared group to my first card before I made the other cards.
Is there a way to do that afterwards? and have a new group shared on all
the cards?
Copying a shared group to existing cards doesn't seem to create an
Bob,
I also found that changing the behavior of group "dataGrid x" does not stick
and after restart you have to set it again.
However if you want to use the convenience of a behavior you could set in your
case as far as user interaction via doubleMouseUp is concerned you could set
the
18 matches
Mail list logo
