Re: Android Release Requires 21 but 911 Devices Get Dropped?

What is "4.x" ? Minimum Android Version? I did as you suggested last year, two builds e.g version 22 for arm v7 and arm64 version 23 for x86 and x86_64 both came in (using SDK 21) about 95MB the last versions, (20,21) done with SDK 18 were about 70MB the analysis did not complain about

Re: Learned my lesson

On 4/17/20 6:53 PM, Phil Davis via use-livecode wrote: I feel your pain! I switched to using "of me" or "of the owner of me" whenever possible which works very well in many/most cases, but sometimes it just isn't enough. "the mainstack of this stack" always work as well. Almost always. Don't

Re: Learned my lesson

I’ve also discovered the childControlIDs and the childControlNames. These list the direct children of a group. The controlNames and controlIDs list EVERY object on a card whether grouped or not. The latter becomes especially handy of you preface your object names with some kind of type

Re: Learned my lesson

I feel your pain! I switched to using "of me" or "of the owner of me" whenever possible which works very well in many/most cases, but sometimes it just isn't enough. Phil Davis On 4/17/20 6:41 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: I just spent 2 hours purging the detestable “this stack”

Learned my lesson

I just spent 2 hours purging the detestable “this stack” from my entire list of projects. If you use substacks, if you hide and show stacks, this stack simply unreliable. Instead put this at the head of every script that needs to know what the parent stack is: put getParentStack(the long id of

Re: Long Standing Issue with the defaultStack

Okay wrong again. The message gets sent first to the card, then the stack, then the stack behavior, then the main stack. But before any of that, I get a dialog asking if I want to save the stack! That is what I am trying to avoid! This was discussed before, and I thought closeStackRequest was

Long Standing Issue with the defaultStack

Hi all. I think I have stumbled across what appears to be a bug. When I open a sub stack from a main stack script, the main stack remains the defaultStack. This is causing any number of issues with me. I have a closeStackRequest handler for instance that auto saves the stack. It never gets

RE: Android Release Requires 21 but 911 Devices Get Dropped?

From the release notes: 4.x support is dropped. That represents 5% of all active installs but may be a higher percentage of devices. What architectures are you building for? Putting all 4 into one apk can exceed the size limits for some devices. Ralph DiMola IT Director Evergreen Information

Re: Even Distribution

Bob belabored, > BAs I said, all else being equal, roughly same work required, localized > territory, no chance of a job being rescheduled, etc. Use a Round Robin > approach. For that matter, if it is an ongoing situation, where this is simply a daily load of randomly sized tasks, round

Re: A short question about Xcode

Thanks Bill - I will try very hard to take your advice. Right now I am a couple of steps back as I am getting strange results on the simulator - widgets (just mobile labels) disappearing, and the GPS activation which worked a couple of hours ago, suddenly failing… hope to get back to the real

Re: Even Distribution

Awesome. thank you! On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 1:15 PM Alex Tweedly via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Or to do the full distribution ... > > put Njobs div Ndrivers into tMin > put NJobs mod Ndrivers into tExtras > > repeat with i = 1 to NDrivers > if i <= tExtras

Android Release Requires 21 but 911 Devices Get Dropped?

I wonder if I did something wrong. Just releasing a new version of SivaSiva to the stores... Using 9.6.0 dp 4  -- which contained an important bug fix for the javascript handlers in the browser widget. I want prompted that I need to upgrade for SDK18 to SDK21. With no apparent option to do

Re: Dark Mode Detection

Hi Richmond, > Am 17.04.2020 um 19:43 schrieb Richmond via use-livecode > : > > Well: you and I both are at fault: > Myself for expecting LiveCode to adopt dark mode, > and you for describing something as "fine print" which is nothing of the sort. 8-)

Re: Dark Mode Detection

Well: you and I both are at fault: Myself for expecting LiveCode to adopt dark mode, and you for describing something as "fine print" which is nothing of the sort. Love, love bites, bites and so on. Richmond. On 17.04.20 20:37, Klaus major-k via use-livecode wrote: Hi Richmond, Am

Re: Dark Mode Detection

Hi Richmond, > Am 17.04.2020 um 19:26 schrieb Richmond via use-livecode > : > > "Dark mode detection > A new systemAppearance property has been added which returns > dark if the application is running in dark mode and light otherwise. > > A new systemAppearanceChanged message is now sent to

Re: Dark Mode Detection

"Dark mode detection A new systemAppearance property has been added which returns dark if the application is running in dark mode and light otherwise. A new systemAppearanceChanged message is now sent to the current card of the defaultStack when the system appearance changes." And where would

Re: Even Distribution

Or to do the full distribution ... put Njobs div Ndrivers into tMin put NJobs mod Ndrivers into tExtras repeat with i = 1 to NDrivers    if i <= tExtras then   allocate tMin+1   else allocate tMin   end if end repeat However, say your drivers are sorted alphabetically, then before

Re: Error in evaluatejavascript with widget browser only on iOS and Livecode > 9.06

> Le 17 avr. 2020 à 17:41, Ludovic THEBAULT via use-livecode > a écrit : > > > >> Le 17 avr. 2020 à 16:55, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode >> a écrit : >> >> Hello Ludovic, >> >> Could you please file a bug report and include a (ideally simple) sample >> stack, so as we investigate

Re: Dark Mode Detection

Hi Richmond, > Am 17.04.2020 um 18:20 schrieb Richmond via use-livecode > : > > Well, as per the Read Me for LC 9.6.0 DP-4 . . . > Running on MacOS 10.15.5 beta 1 in dark mode: LiveCode is as white as a white > thing. > Um? get used to also read the fineprint! :-D Best Klaus -- Klaus

Re: Dark Mode Detection

I guess it means that you can make an application that detects whether or not the user system is running in dark mode and write your own code to set the properties of your application accordingly. It means that you can write applications that are aware of the mode on the user system. Best

Dark Mode Detection

Well, as per the Read Me for LC 9.6.0 DP-4 . . . Running on MacOS 10.15.5 beta 1 in dark mode: LiveCode is as white as a white thing. Um? ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe

Re: Apps to fight COVID-19

Here is a cool app from Kreativzirkel Design Studio. It is a contact diary as mentioned here. https://www.coronika.app/en I say "cool", but I haven't tried it. it looks good. Should it be done better? > On Apr 15, 2020, at 4:57 PM, dsc--- via use-livecode >

Re: Error in evaluatejavascript with widget browser only on iOS and Livecode > 9.06

> Le 17 avr. 2020 à 16:55, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode > a écrit : > > Hello Ludovic, > > Could you please file a bug report and include a (ideally simple) sample > stack, so as we investigate asap? > > Kind regards, > Panos Ok. So, I wanted to remove all scripts and cards

Re: A short question about Xcode

Graham: I’ve been where you are, with the maze of requirements to get an app on iPhone. One thing I found was that the trail of mis-steps left a confusing mess of invalid entries in the keychain and Xcode app, and in the other places in my . When I got rid of every entry that I had made and

Re: Error in evaluatejavascript with widget browser only on iOS and Livecode > 9.06

Hello Ludovic, Could you please file a bug report and include a (ideally simple) sample stack, so as we investigate asap? Kind regards, Panos -- On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 17:45, Ludovic THEBAULT via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > > > Le 17 avr. 2020 à 16:37, Brian Milby

Re: Error in evaluatejavascript with widget browser only on iOS and Livecode > 9.06

> Le 17 avr. 2020 à 16:37, Brian Milby via use-livecode > a écrit : > > Have you tried without the wait? > > Thanks, Hello, Yes, without the wait, the error is always here. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please

Re: Error in evaluatejavascript with widget browser only on iOS and Livecode > 9.06

Have you tried without the wait? Thanks, Brian On Apr 17, 2020, 2:06 AM -0400, Ludovic THEBAULT via use-livecode , wrote: > Hello, > > > I’ve a strange error : > > I have an application where you can change the GPS coordinates from a marker > on a map, in a browser widget. > For this I use the

Re: Even Distribution

As I said, all else being equal, roughly same work required, localized territory, no chance of a job being rescheduled, etc. Use a Round Robin approach. Start with first worker, store as next worker, assign first job, update next worker. On to job 2 and so forth until no more jobs. Next day

Re: Even Distribution

Wait, what? You didn’t mention that! Okay we do service for copiers in the greater LA area. We assign territories for every technician and every customer. Also, the nearest technician to any zone may be called upon to service another technician’s copiers if the assigned technician is

Re: Even Distribution

That wasn’t part of the initial problem. :-) Bob S > On Apr 16, 2020, at 7:30 PM, Dev via use-livecode > wrote: > > Since you would probably have long trips and short trips, I would try and > allocate on an estimated time to complete basis so that all were busy for > about the same time.

Re: Even Distribution

Assign the jobs round robin if all other things are equal. Bob S > On Apr 16, 2020, at 7:23 PM, Skip Kimpel via use-livecode > wrote: > > I have 15 "jobs" that need to be assigned to 7 "drivers". How would you > evenly distribute the jobs to the drivers? In this case one of the drivers >

Re: Even Distribution

Jerry, You did not over simplify at all! I used your basic concept and tweaked it and then applied it to my nested repeats and BAM... got it. Thanks again, everybody! SKIP On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 12:28 AM Jerry Jensen wrote: > Hi Skip, > Forgive me if this is not the answer you seek, or an

Re: A short question about Xcode

Yup, I’ve only got one currently valid profile and I selected it in the Standalone Settings for my app. Looks like I will have to go over all that again - the problem being that I don’t know why, and XCode error reporting doesn’t really tell you anything useful. Thanks - and in case I don’t

Re: A short question about Xcode

Thanks Jacque - simulator testing is fine, but I need to get the wretched app on the device, mostly so that I can walk around and watch the GPS working, but also of course for proof of concept. I am on the verge of giving up, but thanks to this list I may conquer the mountain of obscurity that

Re: A short question about Xcode

I feel that pain too. When I bought my Mac Plus, my mother had to help me - comparatively speaking (I mean compared with my income) I seem to remember it was even more expensive in those days! Anyway, my perfectly fine iMac (mid-2011) can’t go beyond High Sierra. Wondering whether to scrape up

Error in evaluatejavascript with widget browser only on iOS and Livecode > 9.06

Hello, I’ve a strange error : I have an application where you can change the GPS coordinates from a marker on a map, in a browser widget. For this I use the code "myJSHandler" which allows to retrieve in Livecode the GPS values of the map thanks to javascript. The code works fine on desktop,