Re: Referencing Livecode

2022-06-20 Thread Alan Stenhouse via use-livecode
Hi David In a couple of my publications, I described developing apps with Livecode and referred to www.livecode.org and www.livecode.com, but didn't include anything in the references as there was nothing (AFAICS at that time) that would satisfy scientific publication standards. See:

Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.6.8 RCs and 10.0.0 RCs

2022-06-20 Thread matthias rebbe via use-livecode
Hm, here in LC 9.6.8 RC2 and 10DP4 i see only 'macOS Intel' and 'macOS Apple (experimental)'. When i select both, then a universal standalone is created. So to have separate Intel and M1 versions, I have to run the standalone building 2 times. Once with only Intel selected and then once

Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.6.8 RCs and 10.0.0 RCs

2022-06-20 Thread Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
Indeed, but 'both' results in an app package containing 2 'slices', rather than 2 distinct apps. On Mon, 20 Jun 2022, 21:56 Niggemann, Bernd via use-livecode, < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Richmond wrote: > > > In the standalone builder you have always separated > > Linux 32-bit and

Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.6.8 RCs and 10.0.0 RCs

2022-06-20 Thread Niggemann, Bernd via use-livecode
Richmond wrote: > In the standalone builder you have always separated > Linux 32-bit and 64-bit builds, and the same with > Windows: could you alter the MacOS standalones so we > end up with one INTEL 64-bit standalone, and one ARM > standalone, rather than a awkward sandwich? In the current

Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.6.8 RCs and 10.0.0 RCs

2022-06-20 Thread Richmond via use-livecode
In the standalone builder you have always separated Linux 32-bit and 64-bit builds, and the same with Windows: could you alter the MacOS standalones so we end up with one INTEL 64-bit standalone, and one ARM standalone, rather than a awkward sandwich? Best, Richmond. On 20.06.22 17:50, Mark

Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.6.8 RCs and 10.0.0 RCs

2022-06-20 Thread Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
On 2022-06-18 21:27, matthias rebbe via use-livecode wrote: So, the question now is, is this a macOS problem or is it possible that a standalone could show the wrong setting due to a wrong configuration or so when it is created. It is a macOS (Finder) bug - I think it was the same when they