Re: Windows OS and LC969 weirdness

Panos, Thank you again for saving me a big chunk of time! Yes, this sounds exactly like that bug. The same code works repeatedly on a single monitor. Put the window with a player on the secondary monitor and try and close it and ... freeze. I have no code doing anything related to the

Re: Windows OS and LC969 weirdness

Panos, that bug is from 2017. Is it really the fact that nobody from LC dev team had a look at this bug to get it fixed? Even 2017 a system with more then one display was not uncommon. Matthias > Am 12.06.2023 um 20:19 schrieb panagiotis m via use-livecode > : > > Hello Paul, > > It

Re: Windows OS and LC969 weirdness

Hello Paul, It sounds like this bug: https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=20707 Kind regards, Panos On Mon, 12 Jun 2023, 21:10 Paul Dupuis via use-livecode, < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > I have a weird problem and I am wondering if anyone has seen anything > like it. > > I

Windows OS and LC969 weirdness

I have a weird problem and I am wondering if anyone has seen anything like it. I have an desktop app, built in Livecode 9.6.9 and running under Windows 10 and 11. The app has stacks/windows to display different types of content docText for text, docPDF for PDFs, docImage for images, docMedia

Re: The Backdrop's Purpose In Life

On 6/12/23 12:43 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote: On 5/26/23 10:58 PM, panagiotis m via use-livecode wrote: Note that the LC backdrop does not work on MacOS Ventura. Does anyone know what exactly doesn't work on Ventura? Nevermind, I found the bug report. -- Jacqueline Landman

Re: The Backdrop's Purpose In Life

On 5/26/23 10:58 PM, panagiotis m via use-livecode wrote: Note that the LC backdrop does not work on MacOS Ventura. Does anyone know what exactly doesn't work on Ventura? -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software |

Re: Notarizing a Mac app

On 6/12/23 9:40 AM, Mark Talluto via use-livecode wrote: You have to sign and notarize each time you build a new standalone. Perfect, just what I wanted. Thanks for the confirmation. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software |

Re: Notarizing a Mac app

On 6/12/23 10:28, matthias rebbe via use-livecode wrote: There's a nice little tool available which gives you some information about an app bundle or command line tool or any .dylib and so on. It will tell you which CPU types are supported, if the file was code signed or notarized and much

Re: Notarizing a Mac app

There's a nice little tool available which gives you some information about an app bundle or command line tool or any .dylib and so on. It will tell you which CPU types are supported, if the file was code signed or notarized and much more. It's called Archichect

Re: Notarizing a Mac app

Thanks Paul. It's hard to test when your own machine doesn't need code-signing at all. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On June 12, 2023 6:51:34 AM Paul Dupuis via use-livecode wrote: I'm pretty sure you have to sign

Re: Notarizing a Mac app

Hi Jacque, You have to sign and notarize each time you build a new standalone. Best regards, Mark Talluto appli.io livecloud.io nursenotes.net canelasoftware.com > On Jun 11, 2023, at 9:16

Re: Notarizing a Mac app

I'm pretty sure you have to sign and notarize each build. On 6/12/2023 12:16 AM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote: Does rebuilding a Mac app retain a previous notarization or do I need to re-notarize and re-sign on every new build? I want to distribute a notarized and signed app to