Re: [TIC: Tongue in Cheek] Re: IDE oddities (was Re: Error Messages Are Evil)

2015-02-10 Thread Richard Gaskin
Mark Wieder wrote: Richard- Thursday, May 15, 2014, 2:34:38 PM, you wrote: On another note, as I promised you last week I did ask Ben if RunRev planned on open-sourcing the On-Rev real-time debugger. He's not sure and will check with Kevin, but he did confirm my hunch that it requires

Re: [TIC: Tongue in Cheek] Re: IDE oddities (was Re: Error Messages Are Evil)

2015-02-09 Thread Mark Wieder
Richard- Thursday, May 15, 2014, 2:34:38 PM, you wrote: On another note, as I promised you last week I did ask Ben if RunRev planned on open-sourcing the On-Rev real-time debugger. He's not sure and will check with Kevin, but he did confirm my hunch that it requires specific sockets open on

[TIC: Tongue in Cheek] Re: IDE oddities (was Re: Error Messages Are Evil)

2014-05-15 Thread Alex Tweedly
On 15/05/2014 21:29, Richard Gaskin wrote: As an example of this workflow in action, we have a simple fix here: http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11493 Since the code change is comprised of adding only five characters to a comparison string and can be easily seen in the Message Box,

Re: [TIC: Tongue in Cheek] Re: IDE oddities (was Re: Error Messages Are Evil)

2014-05-15 Thread Richard Gaskin
Well, always good to anticipate future-proofing. :) On another note, as I promised you last week I did ask Ben if RunRev planned on open-sourcing the On-Rev real-time debugger. He's not sure and will check with Kevin, but he did confirm my hunch that it requires specific sockets open on the