On 11/05/2013, at 12:01 PM, Thomas McGrath III wrote:
> What you state here about the rounding is exactly what I have been seeing and
> your suggestion that one should always start from the stored original sizes
> and attributes when cumulative resizes or back to back resizes are needed is
>
Geoff,
What you state here about the rounding is exactly what I have been seeing and
your suggestion that one should always start from the stored original sizes and
attributes when cumulative resizes or back to back resizes are needed is the
only solution so far that I believe will work for thi
Scott Rossi wrote:
Hopefully, RunRev's introduction of the shape object and sub pixel
positioning will minimize these scaling problems.
That, and the dynamic scaling Kickstarter stretch goal.
Oh, how I pray that will be implemented not just for cards, but also for
groups
--
Richard Gas
Hi Geoff:
What I like most about your routine is no need for using the boundingRect.
And you're right, one needs to store all the original geometry for
continual resizing (at least, that's what I do). I've also come across
what is apparently a scaling limitation (bug?) that affects scaling of a
On 10/05/2013, at 10:00 PM, Thomas McGrath III wrote:
> I won't be attending this year but I will be on the simulcast so I'll sort of
> be there in spirit at the conferenceā¦..
OK, I think you will find the mApp talk & demo interesting ;-)
--
Monte Goulding
M E R Goulding - software developme
Hi Scott,
I tried to simplify this and make it so that each control is adjusted in
one step. This also optionally take different scaling factors for
horizontal and vertical. Let me know if I missed anything. I'm not sure
what everyone was seeing with resizing the group affecting the objects in
it
Monte,
I won't be attending this year but I will be on the simulcast so I'll sort of
be there in spirit at the conferenceā¦..
Tom
-- Tom McGrath III
http://lazyriver.on-rev.com
mcgra...@mac.com
On May 10, 2013, at 1:15 AM, Monte Goulding wrote:
> I asked this exact question on StackOverflow a
I asked this exact question on StackOverflow a couple of weeks ago and before I
was attacked by Mark for not asking the question he answered we were getting
somewhere... I did create solution that works by retaining an offset for the
child objects to use in their resizing.
http://stackoverflow.
[ tags on posts are starting to get scary ]
Hi Tom:
Here's some group scaling code I've been meaning to post for a while now.
All it does is scale objects proportionally to a (locked) parent group. If
objects extend beyond the boundaries of the group, their positions and
sizes should stay intact.
Is there a way to resize and move a scrolling group without touching the inside
contents of that group??? This is on mobile and I need to resize a scrolling
group based on the position of the UI (navbar and toolbar when in portrait and
landscape) when the UI changes and then after the scrolling
10 matches
Mail list logo