Re: Banging on about Mac Classic

2012-11-08 Thread Richmond
On 11/08/2012 10:01 PM, Jeff Reynolds wrote: Richmond, I believe 2.6.1 was the last version with mac classic build abilities. in 2.8 it was "build for mac os classic will be available soon" but never came i think. that was the final version for a long time that i had to keep building in when i

Re: Banging on about Mac Classic

2012-11-08 Thread Jeff Reynolds
Richmond, I believe 2.6.1 was the last version with mac classic build abilities. in 2.8 it was "build for mac os classic will be available soon" but never came i think. that was the final version for a long time that i had to keep building in when i had to support classic (then move stack to mo

Re: Banging on about Mac Classic

2012-11-07 Thread Richmond
On 11/07/2012 09:28 PM, Mike Kerner wrote: I can't believe you're making fun of my LC by calling it "steam-driven". Yes, it has heat issues, but it still happily runs a HC stack I wrote for it some 20 years ago. I wasn't calling your LC "steam-driven" (unless it is a different model to my LC

Re: Banging on about Mac Classic

2012-11-07 Thread Mike Kerner
I can't believe you're making fun of my LC by calling it "steam-driven". Yes, it has heat issues, but it still happily runs a HC stack I wrote for it some 20 years ago. Let me know if you get any replies. I might like to try putting LC on it and trying it out, but would the XCMD's/XFCN's work?

Re: Banging on about Mac Classic

2012-11-07 Thread Richmond
On 11/07/2012 09:08 PM, Mike Kerner wrote: that's too new for me. I think I have an LC sitting here that's running 7.0.1. We can all play games of that sort - pace my BBC Micro running MOS - but this is a serious request for any information as to how to obtain a Mac Classic version of RunRev/

Re: Banging on about Mac Classic

2012-11-07 Thread Mike Kerner
that's too new for me. I think I have an LC sitting here that's running 7.0.1. On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Richmond wrote: > On 11/07/2012 08:55 PM, Christophe Leske wrote: > >> Am 07.11.2012 19:32, schrieb Richmond: >> >>> Yes, no surprises, it's Richmond again, the backward looking recidi

Re: Banging on about Mac Classic

2012-11-07 Thread Richmond
On 11/07/2012 08:55 PM, Christophe Leske wrote: Am 07.11.2012 19:32, schrieb Richmond: Yes, no surprises, it's Richmond again, the backward looking recidivist. And, Yes, some of us are using Mac OS 9 and lower; mainly, admittedly, to transfer some HC stacks to LC rather than waste a lot of eff

Re: Banging on about Mac Classic

2012-11-07 Thread Christophe Leske
Am 07.11.2012 19:32, schrieb Richmond: Yes, no surprises, it's Richmond again, the backward looking recidivist. And, Yes, some of us are using Mac OS 9 and lower; mainly, admittedly, to transfer some HC stacks to LC rather than waste a lot of effort that was spent "once-upon-a-time", and/or sp

Banging on about Mac Classic

2012-11-07 Thread Richmond
Yes, no surprises, it's Richmond again, the backward looking recidivist. And, Yes, some of us are using Mac OS 9 and lower; mainly, admittedly, to transfer some HC stacks to LC rather than waste a lot of effort that was spent "once-upon-a-time", and/or spend buckets of time on remaking things