On 13 Aug 2015, at 9:09 pm, Mark Waddingham m...@livecode.com wrote:
That's very true. Indeed, perhaps one could argue that GitHub needs
service-hooks which allow customization of merging and diff display. That
general feature there would solve the VCS problem in a natural way for a
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Dr. Hawkins doch...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't include the vcIgnoreProperites , either.
Nor explain it, it seems:-)
This would cause all of the common suspects to not be included in a
revision
--
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462
On 16 Aug 2015, at 8:51 am, Dr. Hawkins doch...@gmail.com wrote:
But how would objects know whether or not to do this in less you set
properties in them, anyway, or gave them a script?
You give them a script. In my case you handle the lcVCSExport message if you
need to do anything. In
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
wrote:
You give them a script.
Yes, but the script still needs a way to distinguish which changes happen
from normal use, and which from redesign, doesn't it? Clicking a
property seems to be at least as easy as
I'm still trying to grasp the advantage of BAF, since I'm guessing I'm in
the target audience. Then, again, maybe not, since I still haven't gotten
an email about it from Mildred et al.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
wrote:
On 16 Aug 2015, at
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Roger Eller roger.e.el...@sealedair.com
wrote:
Not contributing time and code does not necessarily make one a leech! Many
of us contributed monetarily to the kickstarter, and I believe that earns
us just as many beech points as anybody.
Absolutely.
On 16 Aug 2015, at 1:16 am, Dr. Hawkins doch...@gmail.com wrote:
Along with their customPropertySet, there could be a vcsIgnoresSet, or a
group of properties of vcsIgnoresPosition, vcsIgnoresHilite,
vcsIgnoresText, vcsIgnoresVis, vcsIgnoresSize. There could be a vcsIgnore
checkbook on
On 16 Aug 2015, at 10:37 am, Dr. Hawkins doch...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but the script still needs a way to distinguish which changes happen
from normal use, and which from redesign, doesn't it? Clicking a
property seems to be at least as easy as setting a behavior . . .
In my case, I
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
wrote:
This is one of the curly issues. I personally can’t imagine the tedium of
having to set a default property for half the properties of every object.
It becomes routine; I'm building forms. I have several
Hi All!
I'd second what Graham and Jacqueline shared. My version control system is,
Save as... and the corresponding file creation dates. I would be interested
in learning more about versions control and tracking, though LiveCode
development is not my primary job. (My primary job is K8
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
wrote:
As far as lcVCS goes I actually think it would be good better if we could
work with Mark and Peter to get the file format into the engine.
It really is insane that it isn't built in
Along with their
Receiving Social Security benefits is not leaching off of
society. You pay in until you retire and then you receive
a monthly check base on how much you paid in. Those
who spent their life leaching off society and not paying in
very much get nothing or very little.
The problem in America with
On 14 Aug 2015, at 15:13, JB sund...@pacifier.com wrote:
If you are paying into a pension your whole life are you going
to call yourself a leach when you start collecting it?
Is there an analogy here.
In the UK people down the years have been paying into a pension be it Private
or be it
And in every case of this type of theft you will
probably find the global private management
company Booz, Allen and Hamilton which was
founded in Chicago, Illinois are connected.
John Balgenorth
On Aug 14, 2015, at 7:37 AM, Terence Heaford t.heaf...@icloud.com wrote:
On 14 Aug 2015, at
:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Business-Application-Framework-tp4694846p4695027.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url
This conversation (about version control for LS projects worked on by teams,
not really about BAF at all at this point) is beginning to go over my head.
Long ago I worked in enormous projects (not far off 100 people) without
comprehensive version control, and I guess we did something like
On 8/14/2015 1:47 PM, Graham Samuel wrote:
To me the ideal is a system which can be explained to a team in an
hour and which everyone can then stick to. My (fractured) reading of
this conversation gives me the idea that we are approaching
Gnome-ville, where really nothing can be explained in an
not having having a great deal of knowledge of version control has not
prevented from using lcVCS.
Martin
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Business-Application-Framework-tp4694846p4695053.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive
Graham Samuel wrote:
This conversation (about version control for LS projects worked on
by teams, not really about BAF at all at this point) is beginning
to go over my head. Long ago I worked in enormous projects (not far
off 100 people) without comprehensive version control, and I guess
we
My favorite quote of the week:
The most important thing anyone can do with LiveCode is to simply enjoy
it. Without that, nothing else is possible. --Richard Gaskin
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to
Kay, while I don't disagree with much of the substance of your post, I
would suggest we all try to avoid comparisons with things that lead to
emotion-laden phrases like leeching off society.
Open source is a gift, not an obligation, for both sides, developer and
user alike.
It's always a
On 15 Aug 2015, at 1:09 am, Martin Koob mk...@rogers.com wrote:
Monte has not charged for lcVCS to this point but I will happily pay him for
it when there is an opportunity to do so.
His original plan to provide the lcVCS engine as GPL and then charge for the
IDE plugin and command
In terms of the remaining work, would it be helpful if you had one or two
other people to lend a hand with that?
I didn’t really answer this question sorry. Probably the most helpful would be
more documentation. Perhaps videos explaining things? I have some docs for
lcVCS here
On 15 Aug 2015, at 7:23 am, Malte Brill revolut...@derbrill.de wrote:
how much would you think we need to raise to make your work on this
worthwhile?
I’d surely be willing to put in a couple of €s if we had something that
installs easiely and is easy to use. (Of course best coming out
On 15 Aug 2015, at 8:46 am, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
wrote:
In terms of the remaining work, would it be helpful if you had one or two
other people to lend a hand with that?
I didn’t really answer this question sorry. Probably the most helpful would
be more
The git IDE integration on the other hand could be a plugin (paid or open
source) or part of the IDE that comes out of the box. It’s where the magic
happens. Stuff like the toolTip on the script line numbers showing the author
and commit message. So I’d rather focus on that stuff.
Monte,
Monte Goulding wrote:
It’s a bit of a “how long is a piece of string” question at the
moment. I can’t promise to make anything work out of the box in
the IDE. If that’s what the community wants (I want it too) then
it’s probably better that whatever funding is raised goes to
Edinburgh so
On 15 Aug 2015, at 8:11 am, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
Why not a bundled plugin? There's good precedent with LC shipping with
third-party plugins bundled, and that makes it instantly available to the
widest audience while still managing expectations in terms of
Kay,
Good points, after ignoring the rhetoric. There could be argument about which
features are included in all versions. Seems like zip and PDF support would be
part of any modern authoring system. I contributed a substantial (for me)
amount to the Kickstarter, appreciate the need for the
Not contributing time and code does not necessarily make one a leech! Many
of us contributed monetarily to the kickstarter, and I believe that earns
us just as many beech points as anybody. Climb down off that high horse.
We can hardly see you way up there.
Everyone should be able to have
Well said!
Graham
(Indy licence holder and Kickstarter contributor).
On 14 Aug 2015, at 14:12, Roger Eller roger.e.el...@sealedair.com wrote:
Not contributing time and code does not necessarily make one a leech! Many
of us contributed monetarily to the kickstarter, and I believe that earns
illustrates to me that the community is very concerned about the
possibility of a two-tiered livecode environment where we need to pay extra
to get added premium features that we all will want.
I wasn't going to post but this is such and oxymoron, and so prevalent here
I just can't constrain
As you read this, keep in mind I have no direct knowledge of the financial
standing of RunRev, so its all supposition. (Plus, i'm not a big brain like
most on the list, so ignore me if you wish)
Lets get this out of the way first:
Contributions here, and in the forums, as well as monetary
On 2015-08-12 23:35, Peter TB Brett wrote:
On 2015-08-12 22:52, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Now that we're talking about a much broader scope, and especially
given the central role of VCS in fostering healthy open source work,
my opinion is now more open than before, and somewhat undecided.
If it
On 8/12/2015 4:35 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
## Business Application Framework != version control for stacks
In the meantime, one of our developers explored an alternative approach
to storing apps in version control. It becomes much easier when you
constrain users to write and design
On 2015-08-13 09:07, Mark Waddingham wrote:
On 2015-08-12 23:57, Monte Goulding wrote:
As I said way back when, I'm not averse to Object UUIDs being added as
metadata for the purposes of VCS (i.e. sideline data in objects). I'm
still yet to be persuaded that replacing 'ids' with them is
The view of an Open Source User follows:
I have come to LiveCode from SuperCard on the Mac and was attracted by the
KickStarter campaign which would provide LC as Open Source.
I contributed the minimum amount as LC is for my personnel use and I doubted
the sincerity at the time.
I did
On 2015-08-12 23:57, Monte Goulding wrote:
Thanks for the details Peter. I had thought the BAF was a product of
your work on the file format. I wonder if the current situation
warrants a further investigation into the things that would assist my
script based solution? Object UUIDs and more
Terence Heaford wrote:
The view of an Open Source User follows:
...
I cannot justify the serious outlay for an Indie Licence in LC
As an open source user, why would you even consider the proprietary license?
I now await to be slammed by RG. I won’t take it seriously.
Who's slamming who
that if it had not been for those that supported the
Open Source version then the Paid version would no longer exist and there would
be no Business Application Framework.
The conclusion could be that it’s the Business User who is benefiting from the
contributions of the Open Source backer and it’s the Open
To be fair it is a killer if you do not have such a front-end and want to
have multiple people working in a rigorous way on a single LiveCode project ;)
True but it’s not like there aren’t other funky file formats in GitHub…
storyboard, xib etc.. nasty stuff. Keep the UI as code light as
True but it’s not like there aren’t other funky file formats in
GitHub… storyboard, xib etc.. nasty stuff. Keep the UI as code light
as possible and the code in nicely named scriptified stacks and it’s
reasonable as far as I can tell. You could even put in some commit
hooks to enforce a rule on
I’m not convinced it’s a killer. I just think it needs some special
tools. It really wouldn’t be that hard to build a third party code
review web app that integrated with GitHub via service hooks. Such a
beast would know the export stack file format and present the objects
in the same way the
On 13 Aug 2015, at 5:50 pm, Peter TB Brett peter.br...@livecode.com wrote:
On 2015-08-13 09:07, Mark Waddingham wrote:
On 2015-08-12 23:57, Monte Goulding wrote:
As I said way back when, I'm not averse to Object UUIDs being added as
metadata for the purposes of VCS (i.e. sideline data in
On 13 Aug 2015, at 5:48 pm, Mark Waddingham m...@livecode.com wrote:
This is where UUID based on-disk formats fail - given a PR and its patch it
is exceptionally difficult to work out in which objects the changes are being
made. Given that LiveCode allows (and indeeds encourages you!) to
On 13 Aug 2015, at 09:39, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
What compels you to keep writing like that?
This is how I feel as an Open Source backer, let down.
Now if I had been an open Source backer who laid out thousands for the
principal of Open Source, let down would not
On 13 Aug 2015, at 9:09 pm, Mark Waddingham m...@livecode.com wrote:
True but it’s not like there aren’t other funky file formats in
GitHub… storyboard, xib etc.. nasty stuff. Keep the UI as code light
as possible and the code in nicely named scriptified stacks and it’s
reasonable as far as
On 13/08/15 07:02, Mark Wieder wrote:
On 08/12/2015 10:01 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
First, they are no longer Runtime Revolution or RunRev, they are
LiveCode and have legally changed the company name.
I don't think that's correct.
The legal documents all say Runtime Revolution, Ltd.
I
Thank you to everyone for all your input so far.
Kickstarter was never intended to cover all development costs for
everything we do. Software moves on, platforms move on, development
continues at an astonishing speed in the digital world. Kickstarter was
intended to fund extra developers to help
On 13 Aug 2015, at 13:58, Kevin Miller ke...@livecode.com wrote:
We said during Kickstarter that the product would be dual licensed. That
means we have an Open Source Community Edition and a closed source
Commercial Edition. We made it clear we would continue to have a
commercial product.
Yes.
Perhaps it would help to understand this in context if you look some more
at how some other dual licensed open source projects are run.
Kind regards,
Kevin
Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
On 13/08/2015 14:15, Terence
LiveCode is unusual in many ways. If there are anomalies with how it
integrates with VCSes designed for very different languages that would
really be the least of our concerns.
Indeed - that is a good way to look at it.
If accommodating other people's expectations of normal were a
priority
Monte Goulding wrote:
One thing worth considering is as complex widgets develop the number
of objects on a stack should reduce dramatically making it much
easier to work out what you’re looking at. Combined with scriptified
stacks it’s starting to look like a reasonable solution.
LiveCode is
Aloha, Kevin:
A well considered response. I'll be with you for the long haul, no
question about that.
Please do consider - hear our pleas for tools that are expected out of
the box in an open source arena
1) long, long, long, long standing request SFTP on board. Make a widget
fo that asap
+1
Hi all,
Kevin mentioned in his orignal mail:
… and a PDF Viewer.
Please, please, please also give this one to „the masses“!
We’ve been waiting for this for ages.
Best
Klaus
--
Klaus Major
http://www.major-k.de
kl...@major-k.de
___
Hi all,
Kevin mentioned in his orignal mail:
… and a PDF Viewer.
Please, please, please also give this one to „the masses“!
We’ve been waiting for this for ages.
Best
Klaus
--
Klaus Major
http://www.major-k.de
kl...@major-k.de
___
use-livecode
+2
Very important.
Bill
On Aug 13, 2015, at 11:33 AM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Hi all,
Kevin mentioned in his orignal mail:
… and a PDF Viewer.
Please, please, please also give this one to „the masses“!
We’ve been waiting for this for ages.
Best
Klaus
+1
William Prothero wrote
That said: I love the application and am grateful for it every day that I use
it.
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
___
use-livecode mailing list
: Business Application Framework
+2
Very important.
Bill
On Aug 13, 2015, at 11:33 AM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Hi all,
Kevin mentioned in his orignal mail:
… and a PDF Viewer.
Please, please, please also give this one to „the masses“!
We’ve been waiting
The big response on this topic illustrates to me that the community is very
concerned about the possibility of a two-tiered livecode environment where we
need to pay extra to get added premium features that we all will want.
Personally, I am very happy with the direction and work that the dev
On 08/13/2015 04:09 AM, Mark Waddingham wrote:
That's very true. Indeed, perhaps one could argue that GitHub needs
service-hooks which allow customization of merging and diff display.
That general feature there would solve the VCS problem in a natural way
for a number of types of data which are
On 08/13/2015 10:45 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan
executed next week.
- Gen. George S. Patton
plans are useless, but planning is indispensable.
- Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
On August 13, 2015 8:15:44 AM CDT, Terence Heaford t.heaf...@icloud.com wrote:
Did you advise the Open Source backers at any point prior to or during
the KickStarter campaign that the Commercial product would be different
than the Open Source product except in the area of code protection?
On 08/12/2015 05:48 AM, Andrew Kluthe wrote:
An object-oriented framework for livecode now featuring GIT support? Does
anyone have any more information on this announcement I received?
?
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode
I would also find it very disappointing, after locking in 3 years of Indy
license, to find that addon licenses were required to access some set of
wonderful new livecode features. That said, I'm a single developer, so git
isn't important to me. Also, if the purpose of the Indy license was to
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Andrew Kluthe and...@ctech.me wrote:
I think git support without
having to fiddle around too much would be pretty important to an open
source community.
Where did this announcement appear? I haven't seen it in my email and it's
not in my spam.
I have to
I got an email from Kevin about it yesterday.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015, 7:52 AM Brahmanathaswami, Sannyasin bra...@hindu.org
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Andrew Kluthe and...@ctech.me wrote:
I think git support without
having to fiddle around too much would be pretty important to an
Application Framework, but if
we are talking specifically about team features, aren't team features
contrary to the idea of an indie license - which to me, suggests working
on your own projects as an indie developer.
Best regards,
Lynn Fredricks
President
Paradigma Software
http
Here is the email arriving from Kevin yesterday... Subject: Something Big
I want to improve your business, your cash flow, and your development work.
To do this, we launched a new Business Application Framework. This
framework brings object-oriented programming to LiveCode, is compatible
I don’t completely understand the Business Aoolication
Framework. I am talking about the business license
version being able to use different versions such as
the open source version.
Does the open source version have code that people
shave contributed to improving that is not part of the
paid
Matthias Rebbe wrote:
Am 12.08.2015 um 21:33 schrieb Richard Gaskin:
Kevin Miller wrote:
If you want VCS in the Open Source Community or Indy edition, there
is already lcVCS out there
Where?
The only lcVCS i am aware of is the free lcVCS plugin from Monte. You
can download it at his
It's open source Richard. Anyone can distribute it. I just choose to distribute
binaries of my open source stuff via mergExt for obvious reasons
Sent from my iPhone
On 13 Aug 2015, at 6:31 am, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
Is there another option in the community that
1. Why hasn't this been more widely promoted?
It's only been promoted on the lists, forums and Facebook. For a while RunRev
were going to buy it, then they decided to do their own so I stopped pushing
ahead with lcVCS as it appeared to be a waste of time. Now this and maybe it's
back in the
Le 12 août 2015 à 19:01, Kevin Miller ke...@livecode.com a écrit :
The Business Application Framework is a framework for writing more serious
applications in LiveCode. It is far more than simply adding ³GitHub to
LiveCode. It brings in advanced concepts such as object-orientation, a
model
Kevin Miller wrote:
The Business Application Framework is a framework for writing more
serious applications in LiveCode.
Am I the only one who feels a wee bit insulted?
OK, OK, I know that I am a very small frog in the relatively large
LiveCode pond . . . but I consider my /Devawriter
implementation of stack (de)serialisation
It's entirely free software, and anyone can take the code and finish the
job.
## Business Application Framework != version control for stacks
In the meantime, one of our developers explored an alternative approach
to storing apps in version control
Personally still waiting for the Reworked Multimedia Support..
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1755283828/open-source-edition-of-livecode/posts?page=4
The current audio support is archaic and it's still not possible to
easily record audio on mobile.
regards
alex
On 13/08/2015 5:05 am,
Thanks for the details Peter. I had thought the BAF was a product of your work
on the file format. I wonder if the current situation warrants a further
investigation into the things that would assist my script based solution?
Object UUIDs and more support for working out widget metadata without
On 12/08/15 22:51, Lyn Teyla wrote:
Hi all,
I agree with many of the posters to this thread thus far that it would appear
to be a mistake to offer, at this time, solely with the Business license,
additional features such as built-in GIT compatibility, OOP and MVC.
I would go one step further
Can be found here :-) https://github.com/montegoulding/lcVCS
-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of
Richard Gaskin
Sent: 12 August 2015 21:31
To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Subject: Re: Business Application Framework
Paul Richards wrote:
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Matthias Rebbe wrote:
The only lcVCS i am aware of is the free lcVCS plugin from Monte.
You can download it at his site at http://www.mergext.com.
I didn't see it there, and using the site's Search box yielded 0
results for lcvcs.
Can be
Richmond wrote:
I don't think LiveCode will thrive if it continues to present itself to
the world in the way it is just now.
The more people who state their opinion, the more healthy and
pluralistic the debate will become, and the more likely that LiveCode
will sit up and take notice
But if there's anything in recent discussions on which there's anything close
to unanimity, whether from ol' timers or newcomers, whether from open source
developers or proprietary entrepreneurs, it's that maintaining feature parity
between Community and Commercial as close as practical is
It seems that it's very much in the game. Peter's post was especially
helpful for two reasons:
- It confirms the inherent difficulty in creating a general-purpose
VCS tool that covers all edge cases.
Yes there were a few of curly issues I had to get my head around.
- It clarifies
developer, so git isn't
important to me. Also, if the purpose of the Indy license was
to support single developers, working alone, would git be
particularly attractive? Just asking.
Bill
That makes sense to me, Bill.
I cannot comment specifically on the Business Application Framework
Monte Goulding wrote:
1. Why hasn't this been more widely promoted?
It's only been promoted on the lists, forums and Facebook. For
a while RunRev were going to buy it, then they decided to do
their own so I stopped pushing ahead with lcVCS as it appeared
to be a waste of time. Now this and
Andrew Kluthe wrote:
...I'm pretty shocked to that native GIT support and a proper
MVC-style framework for livecode isn't part of Livecode Community.
I think this is a big mistake on the part of the steward company
of this software. I get the framework thing even, almost. But
basic Version
-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On
Behalf Of Richard Gaskin
Sent: 12 August 2015 21:31
To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Subject: Re: Business Application Framework
Matthias Rebbe wrote:
Am 12.08.2015 um 21:33 schrieb Richard Gaskin:
Kevin Miller wrote:
If you
On 12/08/15 23:52, Andrew Kluthe wrote:
Monte said himself that he was going to stop improving it in major ways as
he expected Livecode Community to have native git support that Livecode
Community's steward company was working on.
Many of us thought this feature was probably a WHEN and not and
On 12/08/15 23:59, Brahmanathaswami wrote:
@ Kevin: We are non-profit.. I have an Indy license solely for the iOS
password protection requirement. Expand my use case to 10,000's of
students and educators and hobbyists and web site owners who mix it up
with desktop clients and server side API's
Richmond wrote:
I feel for Richard Gaskin a lot as he is caught between the Devil and
the Deep Blue Sea, and doing that for nothing as well: not fun at times,
I'm sure.
I appreciate your concern, but my experience is very much the opposite:
I'm not on any payroll but my own; I am not an
On 13/08/15 00:20, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Richmond wrote:
I feel for Richard Gaskin a lot as he is caught between the Devil and
the Deep Blue Sea, and doing that for nothing as well: not fun at
times,
I'm sure.
I appreciate your concern, but my experience is very much the
opposite: I'm
Am 12.08.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com:
Matthias Rebbe wrote:
The only lcVCS i am aware of is the free lcVCS plugin from Monte. You
can download it at his site at http://www.mergext.com. But you have
to register first.
I didn't see it there, and using
On 12/08/15 23:52, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Andrew Kluthe wrote:
...I'm pretty shocked to that native GIT support and a proper
MVC-style framework for livecode isn't part of Livecode Community.
I think this is a big mistake on the part of the steward company
of this software. I get the framework
Indeed this is what I was told. I thought I had convinced Kevin that version
control needed to stop being an afterthought on this platform and start being
something that just works with the core offering. The platform wouldn't even be
considered by most developers because of the binary format.
...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin Miller wrote:
The Business Application Framework is a framework for writing more serious
applications in LiveCode.
Am I the only one who feels a wee bit insulted?
OK, OK, I know that I am a very small frog in the relatively large LiveCode
pond . . . but I
On 13 Aug 2015, at 9:52 am, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
wrote:
Sample Stacks is a bit of a turn-off, and the older RevOnline name
wasn't much better. But the role is very very worthwhile: it's where all of
us can share stack files easily.
I’ll upload today.
Hmm… can’t
On 08/12/2015 05:45 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
Why doesn’t this thing support zip files...
Indeed.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and
Richard Gaskin wrote:
So lets dive in with lcVCS in v7 today, and with any luck the project
will attract enough contributors that they'll be able to handle at
least some of whatever work may be needed to port it to v8 later,
allowing you to maximize the time you spend on your externals which
On 08/12/2015 02:27 PM, Richmond wrote:
However, I do think that the person who said Good luck list/livecode
community, I'll see you later. is not helping at all.
That is just negative flack that does not lead anywhere.
Agreed, although I have to admit I understand and have been tending in
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
