has written which would
have to be released under GPL, but the plug-ins would be incompatible with
it?
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Community-version-download-tp4663218p4663235.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive
On 12/04/2013, at 3:53 PM, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
The inability to use protected plug-ins is an interesting and quite
significant feature.
They can't GPL the password protection code... can't even release it to
enterprise users without putting everyone at risk.
--
M E R Goulding
Software
...@sweattechnologies.com
Date: Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: Community version download
To: How to use LiveCode use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Yes there is so you might want to take screenshots of where it says the
wrong thing and bug report them.
On 12/04/2013, at 10:51 AM
Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
Date: Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: Community version download
To: How to use LiveCode use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Yes there is so you might want to take screenshots of where it says the
wrong thing and bug report them.
On 12/04/2013
Subject: Re: Community version download
To: How to use LiveCode use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Yes there is so you might want to take screenshots of where it says
the
wrong thing and bug report them.
On 12/04/2013, at 10:51 AM, Magicgate Software - Skip Kimpel
s...@magicgate.com wrote
On Apr 11, 2013, at 11:11 PM, Kay C Lan wrote:
… plug-in vendors which will now need to update
their web pages to indicate whether their tools are LC Community compatible
This will be an issue for me, and in fact it jogs my elbow about one particular
plugin that I use constantly: Chipp
Is there a difference between the community version download and the
commercial version? I downloaded the community version and input my
license info. When launched, it says it is the commercial version.
Just making sure I am not missing out on anything here.
SKIP
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
wrote:
Yes there is so you might want to take screenshots of where it says the
wrong thing and bug report them.
Can you please explain this further, I'm now (again) confused.
I was under the impression that a
On 12/04/2013, at 12:26 PM, Kay C Lan wrote:
I was under the impression that a Commercial version of LC is the Community
Edition of LC + the ability to password protect stacks. There is nothing in
Community that is not in Commercial.
Yes
Why would anyone with a Commercial license for LC
Oh, and just one other thing I've picked up on. If you have any 3rd party
tools or pluggins that contain protected code, then these will NOT load
into LC Community and it just doesn't run.
I would think most Commercial license holders would have a bunch of
pluggins to make stack development
On 12/04/2013, at 12:41 PM, Kay C Lan wrote:
the ability to password protect stacks +
the ability to use password protected plugins.
This is the same thing as plugins are stacks
I think the silent not loading the stack thing is good. That means you can use
the same extensions folder and
Here is a screen shot of my confusion:
http://www.magicgate.com/LicenseConfusion.jpg
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Monte Goulding
mo...@sweattechnologies.com wrote:
On 12/04/2013, at 12:41 PM, Kay C Lan wrote:
the ability to password protect stacks +
the ability to use password
On 12/04/2013, at 1:03 PM, Magicgate Software - Skip Kimpel wrote:
Here is a screen shot of my confusion:
http://www.magicgate.com/LicenseConfusion.jpg
Right... that's got to be a bug.
--
M E R Goulding
Software development services
Bespoke application development for vertical markets
Maybe I should have written:
the ability to password protect your own stacks + the ability to use 3rd
party password protected stacks. Whilst the route cause is the same thing,
I think these are 2 very distinct situations which will require
highlighting, especially by plug-in vendors which will
Nice. I think it was Peter Haworth who is looking for a way to
differentiate between which Edition of LC the User was using. It appears
that Runrev are in need of the same solution. ;-)
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Magicgate Software - Skip Kimpel
s...@magicgate.com wrote:
Here is a
On 12/04/2013, at 1:11 PM, Kay C Lan wrote:
Whilst the route cause is the same thing,
I think these are 2 very distinct situations which will require
highlighting, especially by plug-in vendors which will now need to update
their web pages to indicate whether their tools are LC Community
or some of them into programs one has written which would
have to be released under GPL, but the plug-ins would be incompatible with
it?
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Community-version-download-tp4663218p4663235.html
Sent from the Revolution
On 12/04/13 05:26, Kay C Lan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
wrote:
Yes there is so you might want to take screenshots of where it says the
wrong thing and bug report them.
Can you please explain this further, I'm now (again) confused.
I was
18 matches
Mail list logo
