Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-09-07 Thread Gerry Orkin
I have been thinking that the list was dead - until I saw 216 messages that have been filtered into my gmail spam folder.  Ugh.  Gerry — Sent from Mailbox for iPad On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Nicolas Cueto nicon...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug

Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-09-07 Thread Nicolas Cueto
As someone wrote, try gmail filter settings. Though messages will still appear with a spam banner. Perhaps LC's new incarnation or popularity have somehow offended the google godkins... -- Nicolas Cueto ___ use-livecode mailing list

Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-09-07 Thread Dr. Hawkins
OK, this is a bit much . . . (*my* comment on the irony of the message landing in spam *itself* landed in my own spam list . . . On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Dr. Hawkins doch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Nicolas Cueto nicon...@gmail.com wrote: Each few hours now for

Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-09-07 Thread Mark Wieder
Richard- Ha! Metaspam eats its own tail! -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:

Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-09-07 Thread Peter Haworth
I've never had a list message be identified as spam by Google. Somewhat curious to understand why this is happening to some folks but not others. Pete lcSQL Software http://www.lcsql.com On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Dr. Hawkins doch...@gmail.com wrote: OK, this is a bit much . . . (*my*

Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-09-07 Thread stephen barncard
sometimes one has to 'train' the Gmail spambox - when in the spam folder, checkbox the ones that aren't spam then click the 'not spam' button and that should correct the spam filter's actions. Works for me. On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Peter Haworth p...@lcsql.com wrote: I've never had a

Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-09-07 Thread Peter Haworth
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:48 AM, stephen barncard stephenrevoluti...@barncard.com wrote: sometimes one has to 'train' the Gmail spambox - when in the spam folder, checkbox the ones that aren't spam then click the 'not spam' button and that should correct the spam filter's actions. Works for

Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-09-07 Thread stephen barncard
I've had to help Google with a couple of random messages from the list that ended in the spam box and it didn't happen again. So that's why I assumed that it was learning with my help. On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Peter Haworth p...@lcsql.com wrote: On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:48 AM, stephen

Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-08-29 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Nicolas Cueto nicon...@gmail.com wrote: Each few hours now for several weeks Google's SMAP filter has been mistakenly categorizing a handful of list messages at a time. Seems like 10 to 20 messages a day, with no recognizable pattern to them. Ironically, this

Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-08-29 Thread Mike Kerner
You can (and I have) create filters that will prevent these messages as being marked as spam. In your Filters, set anything that has from lists.runrev.com as not spam. On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Dr. Hawkins doch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Nicolas Cueto

Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-08-24 Thread Richmond
On 08/24/2013 04:05 AM, Kay C Lan wrote: I noticed this started at least 2 months ago, but I only get about 1-3 List posts a day end up in my Spam folder. I now check the Spam folder every day for List posts, I might get 2 or 3 a year that are really Spam, so currently all my Spam, isn't. Also

Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-08-24 Thread Thierry Douez
Yep. Just got yours as a spam. I got ​3 or 4 Livecode post flagged as spam every day since a couple of weeks :( 2013/8/23 Nicolas Cueto nicon...@gmail.com On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Dr. Hawkins doch...@gmail.com wrote: Oddly, google flagged Scott's message as spam. I only found it

Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-08-24 Thread Antti Ilola
I have also noticed that some messages Google categorizing as spam. 2013/8/24 Thierry Douez th.do...@gmail.com Yep. Just got yours as a spam. I got ​3 or 4 Livecode post flagged as spam every day since a couple of weeks :( 2013/8/23 Nicolas Cueto nicon...@gmail.com On Fri, Aug 23,

Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-08-24 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote: It just put 4 messages with the same headers in 2 different places: 2 in the in-box and two in the spam-box. In my case, Scott's was in spam, the rest of the thread not. And a check showed that the overwhelming

Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?

2013-08-23 Thread Peter M. Brigham
I was playing around with the executionContexts and came up with a more readable format for it, for anyone who's interested. The executionContexts returns something like: button id 1053 of group id 1040 of card id 1002 of stack /Users/pmbrig/Documents/LiveCode/pmbLib.rev,mouseup,114 group id

Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?

2013-08-23 Thread Dr. Hawkins
Oddly, google flagged Scott's message as spam. I only found it when looking after Craig referred to it . . . On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Scott Rossi sc...@tactilemedia.com wrote: You might try the executionContexts property (may still be undocumented). Use this after executing something:

Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?

2013-08-23 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:55 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote: If this is just for debugging, you don't need to script it. Set a breakpoint, and the executionContexts appear in a popdown button at the top of the script editor. You can use that to backtrack through the script to

Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-08-23 Thread Nicolas Cueto
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Dr. Hawkins doch...@gmail.com wrote: Oddly, google flagged Scott's message as spam. I only found it when looking after Craig referred to it . . . Each few hours now for several weeks Google's SMAP filter has been mistakenly categorizing a handful of list

Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-08-23 Thread Kay C Lan
I noticed this started at least 2 months ago, but I only get about 1-3 List posts a day end up in my Spam folder. I now check the Spam folder every day for List posts, I might get 2 or 3 a year that are really Spam, so currently all my Spam, isn't. Also can't figure out any pattern. in the last

Re: Google's SPAM filters [was Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?]

2013-08-23 Thread Ender Nafi Elekçioğlu
vaf  't qh ( w — Sent from Mailbox for iPhone On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Kay C Lan lan.kc.macm...@gmail.com wrote: I noticed this started at least 2 months ago, but I only get about 1-3 List posts a day end up in my Spam folder. I now check the Spam folder every day for List posts,

Finding the calling code/object/script?

2013-08-22 Thread Dr. Hawkins
Is there a way to work back up a message to see where a command originated? I am trying to trap a message that used to be valid in my code, that isn't. Earlier versions allowed this message to go straight to a field. So a send someCommand to fld abc is no longer valid; it must now come in the

Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?

2013-08-22 Thread Mark Schonewille
Richard, The executionContexts contains a list of all handlers and objects that called one of the handlers in the current chain. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com Twitter:

Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?

2013-08-22 Thread Scott Rossi
You might try the executionContexts property (may still be undocumented). Use this after executing something: put the executionContexts Shows the objects that handled messages . Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, UX/UI Design On 8/22/13 12:44 PM, Dr. Hawkins

Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?

2013-08-22 Thread dunbarx
, this information is available as: line -2 of the executionContexts. Craig -Original Message- From: Scott Rossi sc...@tactilemedia.com To: LiveCode Mail List use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Sent: Thu, Aug 22, 2013 4:38 pm Subject: Re: Finding the calling code/object/script? You might try

Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?

2013-08-22 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Mark Schonewille m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com wrote: The executionContexts contains a list of all handlers and objects that called one of the handlers in the current chain. That is just perfect! word 1 of line 1 of the executionContexts is field when

Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?

2013-08-22 Thread Peter Haworth
Check out the executionContexts - it will give you a trace back of the calling hierarchy. Pete lcSQL Software http://www.lcsql.com On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Dr. Hawkins doch...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a way to work back up a message to see where a command originated? I am trying

Re: Finding the calling code/object/script?

2013-08-22 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 8/22/13 3:57 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Mark Schonewille m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com wrote: The executionContexts contains a list of all handlers and objects that called one of the handlers in the current chain. That is just perfect! word 1 of line