In that book I wrote there is a chapter on making a web scraper, something that
could pull images and other media from a web page. I soon found all the
articles talking about not using regex with HTML, so I used a mixture of
techniques instead. Here’s the first part I wrote about it:
“A common
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lis
That was it! LOL!
Bob S
> On Aug 13, 2018, at 09:28 , J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> I You can't parse html with regex:
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1732348/regex-match-open-tags-except-xhtml-self-contained-tags#
>
> See the top accepted answer.
> --
> Jacqueline La
I You can't parse html with regex:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1732348/regex-match-open-tags-except-xhtml-self-contained-tags#
See the top accepted answer.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On August 13, 2018 11:12:53
…ad insanem regexum - maybe his tin-foil hat slipped off.
Keith
> On 13 Aug 2018, at 17:11, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Someone did a great article on using regex to parse csv files or some such
> thing, and was making the case why it couldn't be done, and in the middle of
> a
Someone did a great article on using regex to parse csv files or some such
thing, and was making the case why it couldn't be done, and in the middle of
attempting to explain it, the author loses his mind. It was pretty funny.
Bob S
> On Aug 13, 2018, at 09:01 , Keith Clarke via use-livecode
Indeed, especially when anything regexy should be viewed from a safe distance -
ideally from behind the couch …in a tin-foil hat!
> On 13 Aug 2018, at 16:54, Mark Wieder via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> On 08/13/2018 08:51 AM, Keith Clarke via use-livecode wrote:
>> Thanks Mark - that fixed it (a
On 08/13/2018 08:51 AM, Keith Clarke via use-livecode wrote:
Thanks Mark - that fixed it (as in, the simpler approach of dropping the
brackets).
Being ‘regex-phobic', I hadn’t picked up the subtle difference between
wildcards and ‘formal’ regex in the doc examples. ;-)
Yeah, it's pretty subt
Thanks Mark - that fixed it (as in, the simpler approach of dropping the
brackets).
Being ‘regex-phobic', I hadn’t picked up the subtle difference between
wildcards and ‘formal’ regex in the doc examples. ;-)
Thanks & regards,
Keith
> On 13 Aug 2018, at 16:38, Mark Wieder via use-livecode
>
On 08/13/2018 08:32 AM, Keith Clarke via use-livecode wrote:
Folks,
I’m trying to filter a list of comma-delimited values to include only the lines
that contain a string - somewhere in any of the items.
What’s wrong with this syntax - it’s currently returning no lines when I can
see tString in
Folks,
I’m trying to filter a list of comma-delimited values to include only the lines
that contain a string - somewhere in any of the items.
What’s wrong with this syntax - it’s currently returning no lines when I can
see tString in the second line of the variable?
filter lines of tList with "
11 matches
Mail list logo