Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

Dan Brown wrote: > The logistics of operating an ad aggregator would be a full time > business in itself I'd imagine. However lc forming a partnership > with one of the top existing aggregators and creating a widget to > display the ads I could see being a winner. > > For apps made in lc

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Dan Brown via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > The logistics of operating an ad aggregator would be a full time business > in itself I'd imagine. However lc forming a partnership with one of the top > existing aggregators and creating a

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

That would work for me. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 22, 2017, at 1:30 AM, Dan Brown via use-livecode > wrote: > > The logistics of operating an ad aggregator would be a full time business > in itself I'd imagine. However lc forming a partnership with one of the

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

The logistics of operating an ad aggregator would be a full time business in itself I'd imagine. However lc forming a partnership with one of the top existing aggregators and creating a widget to display the ads I could see being a winner. For apps made in lc community they could take a

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

When you sign up with an ad aggregator, a portion of the revenue goes to the aggregator. This would be no different. Basically, I am suggesting something like MobFox for LiveCode. Voluntary, of course. We need a realistic and practical as solution for ads. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 21,

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Jonathan Lynch via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > I was suggesting that perhaps providing a start to finish way for us to > have ads in the apps we make could provide extra income to RunRev - more > than the cost of hiring extra staff to

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

I did not mean inside the IDE. I was suggesting that perhaps providing a start to finish way for us to have ads in the apps we make could provide extra income to RunRev - more than the cost of hiring extra staff to make that happen. I don't want to sound like I know what is best for them - I

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

No he said apps MADE in Livecode. But I think it's a bad idea for RunRev (livecode whatever) to get sidetracked. I really like the progress they are making with new features and bug fixes. I want this long train to keep on moving. After all, without love, where would you be right now? (hmmm...

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Jonathan Lynch via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > My suggestion might be terrible, but I put it in for discussion. I > suggested LC take on the role of ad aggregator for providing in-app adds > for apps made with LC. It could be a source of

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

Ouch. On 7/21/17 11:58 pm, Jonathan Lynch via use-livecode wrote: My suggestion might be terrible, but I put it in for discussion. I suggested LC take on the role of ad aggregator for providing in-app adds for apps made with LC. It could be a source of revenue for the company and for

I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

My suggestion might be terrible, but I put it in for discussion. I suggested LC take on the role of ad aggregator for providing in-app adds for apps made with LC. It could be a source of revenue for the company and for developers, and it could attract more developers looking for easy solutions