nformative than
Microsoft's Smartscreen warnings.
( how-the-smartscreen-filter-works-in-windows
<http://www.howtogeek.com/123938/htg-explains-how-the-smartscreen-filter-works-in-windows-8/>
)
Tom B.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.na
I have a Adobe CC business account. When the problem requires a re-install
Adobe tech support always has me disable AV SW on any of the PCs with CC
installed. If Adobe requires turning off the AV SW to install CC components
then why would it be a problem for LC SW distribution to require the same?
Or, NOT off-list.
Tom
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Idea-about-Norton-tp4711879p4711882.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use
I think AV authors were onto this trick a long time ago. I've asked LC to
look into seeing what can be done about this (mainly by contacting Norton),
because we use NAV at our company, and for every new compile of every
desktop app, we have to manually approve it on every workstation.
On Mon, Jan
I think this is the wrong way to go about it. I don't think Norton simply
counts the number of times software attempts to install without signing, and
then has a threshold where it accepts the unsigned installation without
challenge. I have noticed however that sometimes installation instruction
Hi Graham.
I wanted to float a rough idea off-list... Tell me what you think.
If Norton faults our files for being new and not (yet) popular, perhaps we
could generate a base of download activity ourselves to get over the threshold.
Specifically, I'm thinking of an informal group of software a
