Richmond wrote:
> On 15/01/15 21:51, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>> Throughout the forums and the bugs reports I've been following
>> I've seen fairly regular references to Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, the
>> most recent Long-Term Support release the project has.
>
> That's good to know :)
>
> Last I heard they w
On 15/01/15 21:51, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Richmond wrote:
>> On 15/01/15 16:34, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
>>
>> Pretty much standardized.
...
>> An RC believes that all bugs are taken care of, and is only making
>> sure of this.
>
> Why do I have a funny feeling that RunRev probably know that?
Because
Richmond wrote:
>> On 15/01/15 16:34, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
>>
>> Pretty much standardized.
...
>> An RC believes that all bugs are taken care of, and is only making
>> sure of this.
>
> Why do I have a funny feeling that RunRev probably know that?
Because they're described in similar terms at the
On 15/01/15 20:31, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Richmond
wrote:
On 15/01/15 16:34, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:56 PM, John Dixon
wrote:5.5 if you want stability; it is late-beta quality.
Some report stability on 6.6, apparently.
6.7 and 7.0 are lat
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Richmond
wrote:
> On 15/01/15 16:34, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:56 PM, John Dixon
>> wrote:5.5 if you want stability; it is late-beta quality.
>>
>> Some report stability on 6.6, apparently.
>>
>> 6.7 and 7.0 are late and early alpha quali
On 15/01/15 16:34, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:56 PM, John Dixon wrote:
Yes, but my question really is..
'What is the reason for having all theses different versions being updated
more or less at the same time ?'...
Life was much simpler when you knew the version with the lar
John Dixon wrote:
Why are there different versions of liveCode being updated..
LC 7.0- updated 23 October 2014
LC 7.0.1 - updated 18 December 2014
LC 6.7.0 - updated 18 December 2014
LC 6.7.1 - updated 9 January 2015
Which one is considered to be the 'one' to use ?
As with most softwa
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:56 PM, John Dixon wrote:
> Yes, but my question really is..
> 'What is the reason for having all theses different versions being updated
> more or less at the same time ?'...
> Life was much simpler when you knew the version with the largest number
> stuck on the end of
I believe it's resources needed to make their new handling of UniCode work
(also believe they are looking at ways of slimming down file sizes...)
John Dixon wrote
> from LC 6.7 - 2.8 mb in size
> from LC 7.0 - 28.0 mb in size
>
> Where did all that bloat appear from !?
-
"Some are bor
> Subject: Re: Which version...
>
> As far as I know (which isn't saying much):
>
> LC 6.6.x = maintenance of 'old generation' versions (e.g. carbon)
> LC 6.7.x = 'new generation' stuff like cocoa, excluding UniCode
> LC 7.x.x = all 'new generati
As far as I know (which isn't saying much):
LC 6.6.x = maintenance of 'old generation' versions (e.g. carbon)
LC 6.7.x = 'new generation' stuff like cocoa, excluding UniCode
LC 7.x.x = all 'new generation' stuff, including Unicode
LC 6.6 is for working on legacy stacks
LC 6.7 is for those wanting
n...@lists.runrev.com] Im Auftrag
> von John Dixon
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2015 08:57
> An: How to use LiveCode
> Betreff: RE: Which version...
>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Yes, but my question really is..
> 'What is the reason for having all theses different versi
s they say, were history ?
being pedantic, but I will ask again... Which is the version to use ?...
Dixie
> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:47:31 -0800
> From: d...@applicationinsight.com
> To: use-revolut...@lists.runrev.com
> Subject: Re: Which version...
>
> Hi John
>
> I
Hi John
I do know that on the 5th of January Frazer put out community 6.7.1 for
Windows again because the installer wasn't working properly - and I could
add LC 6.7.2 to your list which also is dated on the 9th...
-
"Some are born coders, some achieve coding, and some have coding thrust upo
14 matches
Mail list logo
