Re. my suggestion that it may be possible for older Macs to stay safe by
upgrading to OS X 10.6:
Looks like I had more faith in Apple than their decisions warrant, as
they just knifed the baby, and 19% of Mac users along with it:
Apple Retires Snow Leopard Support, Leaves 1 In 5 Macs In The
like Lion and Mountain Lion, Mavericks doesn’t cost a thing.
It costs a LOT if one can run 32 bit any more… more bricks on the shelf.
Maybe Apple can shut up for a while now that they've forced everyone to 64
bit. It wouldn't be so bad if they hadn't tried to axe popular apps with
completely
Tiemo Hollmann wrote:
Hi Matthias,
thats what I did, and the installer of snow leopard told me, my hardware is
out of date and incompatible.
I'm sorry to hear that. Apple makes good computers, but their costs
average about twice that of PCs. Good components and all that so I'm
not making a
I completely agree with Tiemo's comments. This is a big issues for me.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553
Use Color Converter to convert CMYK, RGB,
On 25/02/14 18:53, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote:
Though I can follow the arguments for concentrating the efforts on new and
faster platforms, I actually can't believe that only 3,8% of Mac users would
be affected (if you count notebooks to desktops). I myself have beside my
iMac a MacBook from around
On 25.02.2014 at 17:53 Uhr +0100 Tiemo Hollmann TB apparently wrote:
Though I can follow the arguments for concentrating the efforts on new and
faster platforms, I actually can't believe that only 3,8% of Mac users would
be affected (if you count notebooks to desktops). I myself have beside my
