> I get the date you first put in. Tried several, all the way back to the
battle of
> Hastings. All good The negative seconds do the math as well as ordinary
> ones.
If you got a Saturday for 14 October 1066, all good. Otherwise the algorithm
is not accounting for the 1582 or 1752 calendar
dunbarx wrote:
> On 1/8/2016 4:53 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>> Try this:
>>
>> on mouseUp
>>put "1/1/69" into t
>>convert t to secs
>>convert t to short date
>>put t
>> end mouseUp
>
> I get the date you first put in. Tried several, all the way back
> to the battle of Hastings.
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:21 PM, FlexibleLearning.com <
ad...@flexiblelearning.com> wrote:
>
> If you got a Saturday for 14 October 1066, all good. Otherwise the
> algorithm
> is not accounting for the 1582 or 1752 calendar changes.
>
> Yes, often forgotten, as is the particular country you you
On 01/08/2016 03:06 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Mark Waddingham flagged this a while back,
*a while* ... 2007 ... rev 2.8.1rc3
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url
On 1/8/2016 4:53 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Try this:
on mouseUp
put "1/1/69" into t
convert t to secs
convert t to short date
put t
end mouseUp
Is there yet a convenient way to handle conversion of dates prior to
1/1/70?
I get 1/1/69. I get the same thing if I specify the year
J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 1/8/2016 4:53 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Try this:
on mouseUp
put "1/1/69" into t
convert t to secs
convert t to short date
put t
end mouseUp
Is there yet a convenient way to handle conversion of dates prior to
1/1/70?
I get 1/1/69. I get the same thing
Hi,
Malte created a date library https://github.com/derbrill/libdate
If i remember right it can handle dates below 1970 and above 2036.
Matthias
> Am 08.01.2016 um 23:53 schrieb Richard Gaskin :
>
> Try this:
>
> on mouseUp
> put "1/1/69" into t
> convert t to
Richard.
I get the date you first put in. Tried several, all the way back to the battle
of Hastings. All good The negative seconds do the math as well as ordinary
ones.
The thing went south when I tried the birth of Charlemangne. I suppose thee
digit dates are not well received.
Craig