Ali Lloyd wrote:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 12:02 AM Richard Gaskin wrote:
Let's not let Github's limitation impede meaningful work.
What we need is a way to ensure that the changes applied are
the changes we want.
Format is a distant second to that, merely a means to that end and
> On 9 Sep 2015, at 7:31 am, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
> That the v7 IDE has few if any changes between minor release means that a
> merge per se may not be needed. And since an object merge is the only
> complex step not already addressed through relatively simple
Monte Goulding wrote:
>> On 9 Sep 2015, at 7:31 am, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>>
>> That the v7 IDE has few if any changes between minor release
>> means that a merge per se may not be needed. And since an
>> object merge is the only complex step not already addressed
>> through relatively simple
> On 9 Sep 2015, at 10:37 am, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
> If we can just get a review process in place for community enhancements to
> the IDE to be included in the main install, everyone wins.
Are you talking about both script and object property changes or just
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:59 PM Mark Wieder wrote:
> Ali Lloyd writes:
>
> > It's not harder. I'm saying it can't be accepted as a community
> > contribution, because whichever way you slice it, it involves binary
> > stacks.
>
That is indeed the purpose.
Yes, I completely agree that this is a problem which needs a solution. But
the fact remains that we currently don't have one.
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 12:02 AM Richard Gaskin
wrote:
> Ali Lloyd wrote:
> >> >> On 4 Sep 2015, at 12:25 pm, Mark Wieder
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
Charles Warwick wrote:
On 4 Sep 2015, at 12:25 pm, Mark Wieder wrote:
On 09/03/2015 10:52 AM, Ali Lloyd wrote:
That requires a backport, as the script editor in 8 has scriptified
behaviors and a widget for the variable viewer.
I must be missing something. Charles detailed the changes that
On 09/04/2015 04:02 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Let's do this.
Pull request submitted.
https://github.com/runrev/livecode-ide/pull/478
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit
LiveCode
Subject: Re: Editing Large Scripts is Faster
On 09/03/2015 09:54 PM, Charles Warwick wrote:
> For anyone who wants to use this feature on LC7, a copy of the modified
stack is here:
>
>
https://github.com/techstrategies/livecode-ide/blob/feature-7.0-hander-filte
r/Toolset
>
>
> >> On 4 Sep 2015, at 12:25 pm, Mark Wieder
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 09/03/2015 10:52 AM, Ali Lloyd wrote:
> >>
> >>> That requires a backport, as the script editor in 8 has scriptified
> >>> behaviors and a widget for the variable viewer.
> >>
> >> I must be missing something. Charles detailed
Charles Warwick writes:
> Simply download and copy that stack over the top of the existing one of
> the same name.
Thanks for that.
Done, and it works perfectly.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
Ali Lloyd writes:
> It's not harder. I'm saying it can't be accepted as a community
> contribution, because whichever way you slice it, it involves binary
> stacks.
I thought that was the purpose of the 'BugFix:' or 'Feature'
prefixes for bug reports, i.e., here's what's wrong
Ali Lloyd wrote:
>> On 4 Sep 2015, at 12:25 pm, Mark Wieder
wrote:
>>
>> On 09/03/2015 10:52 AM, Ali Lloyd wrote:
>>
>>> That requires a backport, as the script editor in 8 has scriptified
>>> behaviors and a widget for the variable viewer.
>>
>> I must be missing something. Charles detailed
On 09/03/2015 09:54 PM, Charles Warwick wrote:
For anyone who wants to use this feature on LC7, a copy of the modified stack
is here:
https://github.com/techstrategies/livecode-ide/blob/feature-7.0-hander-filter/Toolset/palettes/revscripteditor.rev?raw=true
Works fine in LC6.7 as well, for
Jana Doughty writes:
> We have an added perk to LiveCode 8 DP 4 for you (in case HTML5 wasn't
> exciting enough already!). You can read about it here:
>
> https://livecode.com/editing-large-scripts-faster/
Great! And thanks to Charles for the patch.
Now how about applying
Thanks for the clarification. If someone in the community wanted to
help out my making adding this to the v7 IDE so it could help attract
current customers, what would be the procedure for that?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile,
This wouldn't currently be possible, I don't think. Backporting the
scriptified behaviors involves a binary stack change, as does adding the
filter.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM Richard Gaskin
wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification. If someone in the community
Mark Wieder wrote:
Jana Doughty writes:
We have an added perk to LiveCode 8 DP 4 for you (in case HTML5 wasn't
exciting enough already!). You can read about it here:
https://livecode.com/editing-large-scripts-faster/
Great! And thanks to Charles for the patch.
Now how about applying one
That requires a backport, as the script editor in 8 has scriptified
behaviors and a widget for the variable viewer.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:09 PM Richard Gaskin
wrote:
> Mark Wieder wrote:
> > Jana Doughty writes:
> >
> >> We have an added perk to LiveCode 8 DP 4
> On 4 Sep 2015, at 12:25 pm, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
> On 09/03/2015 10:52 AM, Ali Lloyd wrote:
>
>> That requires a backport, as the script editor in 8 has scriptified
>> behaviors and a widget for the variable viewer.
>
> I must be missing something. Charles detailed
On 09/03/2015 10:52 AM, Ali Lloyd wrote:
That requires a backport, as the script editor in 8 has scriptified
behaviors and a widget for the variable viewer.
I must be missing something. Charles detailed the changes that need to
be made to the revscripteditor.rev script for LC7. Why is that
21 matches
Mail list logo