Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-23 Thread Roger Eller
On Jan 23, 2013 12:07 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote: On 1/22/13 10:56 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: On 1/22/13 9:46 PM, Roger Eller wrote: I think MPEG1 2, as well as AVI. It can't just be MPEG1 and 2, can it? Never mind, I see that's exactly what you meant. MPEG 1 and 2 and AVI. That's

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-23 Thread Robert Sneidar
I think poor Jacque is in one of those situations where the requirements for her project are self contradictory. An extreme example might be if someone wanted me to write a game that was completely portable, and required advanced 3D graphics capabilities, but had to work without requiring the

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-23 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 1/23/13 3:31 PM, Robert Sneidar wrote: To say it needs to be portable, play audio and video, and you cannot require the installation of any software is perhaps a bridge to far. Given the nature of the software though, the requirement is legitimate. Does any other development environment

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-23 Thread As_Simon
J. Landman Gay wrote Since the client will be creating the video, my current thinking is to create two versions, one in WMP native format and another in QT format. The software will download the right one according to platform. That seems the simplest way. The player object works on Windows

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-23 Thread Robert Sneidar
That might be an option. Tell them, I can do this, but if you want the best quality, then I need to ensure that certain codecs are installed. Bob Sneidar IT Manager Calvary Chapel CM Sent from iPhone On Jan 23, 2013, at 14:44, As_Simon si...@asato-media.com wrote: J. Landman Gay wrote Since

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-23 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 1/23/13 4:44 PM, As_Simon wrote: J. Landman Gay wrote Since the client will be creating the video, my current thinking is to create two versions, one in WMP native format and another in QT format. The software will download the right one according to platform. That seems the simplest way.

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-22 Thread J. Landman Gay
I'm still not sure which video formats are supported in LiveCode on Windows machines that don't have QuickTime. Does anyone have a list? -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-22 Thread Roger Eller
I think MPEG1 2, as well as AVI. If playing externally, Microsoft has a list. I would hope that most people have moved past Win95 to Win2k. Assuming a minimum of XP, here's what should work without installing additional software: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899113 If you install VLC, you

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-22 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 1/22/13 9:46 PM, Roger Eller wrote: I think MPEG1 2, as well as AVI. If playing externally, Microsoft has a list. I would hope that most people have moved past Win95 to Win2k. Assuming a minimum of XP, here's what should work without installing additional software:

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-22 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 1/22/13 10:56 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: On 1/22/13 9:46 PM, Roger Eller wrote: I think MPEG1 2, as well as AVI. If playing externally, Microsoft has a list. I would hope that most people have moved past Win95 to Win2k. Assuming a minimum of XP, here's what should work without installing

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-22 Thread Colin Holgate
That list continues to support what I've argued, in that they don't list MPEG-2 as a built in codec. For what it's worth, WMV 9 is a decent codec. On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:46 PM, Roger Eller roger.e.el...@sealedair.com wrote: I think MPEG1 2, as well as AVI. If playing externally,

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-19 Thread Klaus on-rev
Hi friends, Am 18.01.2013 um 21:51 schrieb Alejandro Tejada capellan2...@gmail.com: Hi Stephen, Stephen Barncard-4 wrote VLC is also apple-scriptable. Some months ago, Klaus Major posted a message asking for developers interested in a VLC dll for LiveCode. What happened with this DLL?

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-19 Thread Alejandro Tejada
Hi Klaus, Klaus on-rev wrote Hi friends, What happened with this VLC DLL? Klaus? sorry, no news so far... Best, Klaus Well... VLC changed it's licensing to make possible that commercial applications, like LiveCode, contribute to the project... This change was motivated to match the

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Robert Sneidar
Really? My mistake then I as under the impression that this was included in all operating systems because they will need to play DVD ROM's. Bob On Jan 17, 2013, at 7:53 PM, Colin Holgate wrote: MPEG-2 isn't really an option. Only systems that have DVD-ROMs, and DVD-Video playing software,

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Peter Haworth
Hi Phil, I use ffmpeg too and I found a GUI interface to it - ffmpegx, available at http://www.ffmpegx.com/ Pete lcSQL Software http://www.lcsql.com On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Phil Davis rev...@pdslabs.net wrote: One tool l I have found to be almost magical in its media conversion

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Phil Davis
Righto. That's one of the commercial apps that uses it. p On 1/18/13 11:05 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: Hi Phil, I use ffmpeg too and I found a GUI interface to it - ffmpegx, available at http://www.ffmpegx.com/ Pete lcSQL Software http://www.lcsql.com On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Phil

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Colin Holgate
MPEG-2 isn't needed to use DVD-ROMs. It is needed to play DVD-Video. The license for MPEG-2 is covered in the cost of the software that you buy for playing DVDs. You may well get bundled software, and so the cost is hidden from you. I think that each way of playing back DVD-Video will have its

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Alejandro Tejada
Hi Stephen, Stephen Barncard-4 wrote VLC is also apple-scriptable. Some months ago, Klaus Major posted a message asking for developers interested in a VLC dll for LiveCode. What happened with this DLL? Klaus? I have used VLC from the command line from LiveCode, showing a borderless video

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Alejandro Tejada
Hi Jacque, J. Landman Gay wrote I've been testing in Windows 7 without QuickTime installed to see how video and audio files work in a player object. [snip] I need a video format that will play in Windows without QT. Which of the many others should I look at? Could you try virtualizing

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 1/18/13 2:57 PM, Alejandro Tejada wrote: Hi Jacque, J. Landman Gay wrote I've been testing in Windows 7 without QuickTime installed to see how video and audio files work in a player object. [snip] I need a video format that will play in Windows without QT. Which of the many others should I

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Robert Sneidar
Right. But wasn't the question about being able to play audio and video cross platform without having to make the user install anything? Also, I have played ripped DVD content off my hard drive, and the format of the ripped video is MPEG2, so strictly speaking, you don't *have* to play MPEG2

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Colin Holgate
Yes, exactly. Anyone who doesn't have a DVD-ROM drive and bundled DVD-Video software, or gone to the trouble of installing MPEG-2 playback by some other means, would end up having to install something. QuickTime is probably the easiest thing to require, because of the millions of users who have

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-18 Thread Alejandro Tejada
J. Landman Gay wrote Thanks, I'll ask my client about it. Right now I'm collecting all the responses here so I can talk to them. In this website, you could find Cameyo, a free app for virtualising applications: http://www.cameyo.com/ The virtual app that I build, using StackRunner and

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Alex Shaw
Hi Jacqueline If you don't need streaming you could try MPEG-1 video files. When compressed properly they are relatively good quality, just a bit bigger filesize-wise compared to MPEG-4. regards alex On 18/01/13 8:58 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote: I've been testing in Windows 7 without

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Mark Wieder
J. Landman Gay jacque@... writes: In the Media Player app itself, all the above formats play perfectly. I did not need to download any extra codecs, not even for .mov files. It gets worse. You can't rely on just the file extension. The other day I pulled down a GoToMeeting archive as a .wmv

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 1/17/13 5:34 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: J. Landman Gay jacque@... writes: In the Media Player app itself, all the above formats play perfectly. I did not need to download any extra codecs, not even for .mov files. It gets worse. You can't rely on just the file extension. The other day I

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 1/17/13 5:08 PM, Alex Shaw wrote: Hi Jacqueline If you don't need streaming you could try MPEG-1 video files. I don't know if we'll need streaming yet, so I'll keep this in mind. I didn't test MPEG-1 files yet, so we'll see. Maybe it's moot. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay |

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Robert Sneidar
Hush! You are not implying Microsoft would develop a proprietary codec that only their player could use?? What self respecting corporation would even think of such a thing??? Bob On Jan 17, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: J. Landman Gay jacque@... writes: In the Media Player app

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Robert Sneidar
Do you mean Codecs? To answer your question, yes and no. If you never use WMP, you will probably not have a lot of codecs it supports. Even if you do, you may not have all of them. While the audio codec would probably be installed as a dll in Windows somewhere, and so be an OS function, some

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Scott Rossi
It's been a long time since I dealt with this, but last I checked, MPEG1 and maybe MPEG2 worked cross platform. As Mark said, file extension doesn't always correspond with the encoding of a video file. If you have control over the format of the videos to played, then you should have no trouble.

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Pierre Sahores
Jacque, The best is always to test different outputs formats in using MPEGStreamclip (- Windows formats), Handbrake (MacOS X / Linux formats), QT7 Pro (see export features) and QT 10 (m4v outputs). MPEG1 and MPEG2 are mainly reserved to TV broadband outputs, not featured as web dedicated. Sure

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread J. Landman Gay
Thanks for all the responses. The audio/video files will be prepared by my client and served over the internet to customers. We have control over the format, the names, whatever is needed. The catch is that the people who will be viewing the media can be on any computer, often one they don't

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Colin Holgate
If need be, can you use something other than LiveCode to solve the problem? A Flash projector ought to be able to work, and doesn't rely on any system software to be able to play H.264 video, along with high quality AAC audio. Or, if you can require that the system has Flash Player (which most

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Robert Sneidar
Lowest common denominator then. For audio, use mp3. For video, mpeg2. Just about every modern os supports those 2 out of the box. Bob Sneidar IT Manager Calvary Chapel CM Sent from iPhone On Jan 17, 2013, at 18:38, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote: Thanks for all the responses.

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread stephen barncard
J. There's one open source app that might be ripe for imbedding: VLC http://www.videolan.org/vlc/index.html cross-platform, the source is available, and if one can open a window from the command line This idea was inspired a little mac app called NICECAST. A beautiful mac front end with

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Pierre Sahores
As an example, avi encodes mp4. Just to point out that codecs and the ways video contents are encoded are always two distinct things. If you can use a javascript to test the end user installed OS, you will get way to serve the adapted video format for each different target. Not a painless

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Pierre Sahores
Just follow Bob on this : about audio, don't search any best way than mp3. Will works as expected against any end-user target. I'm not so sure as Bob is about mp2 indeed : lowest compression than mp4 and its useful H264 declinaison. Le 18 janv. 2013 à 03:52, Robert Sneidar a écrit : Lowest

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread stephen barncard
As far as serving video, my experiments have shown that it is often better to use a service that does it for a living, like Vimeo, than to depend on one's own servers. $60/year buys up to 5 gigs of video a month. Far better than youtoob. And if one ends up using a browser for displaying video

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Colin Holgate
MPEG-2 isn't really an option. Only systems that have DVD-ROMs, and DVD-Video playing software, would be able to play MPEG-2. In the Windows world it's not unusual for people to find illegal ways around that, and on Mac you have the option of buying the $20 MPEG-2 playback component, but

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread stephen barncard
VLC is also apple-scriptable. Stephen Barncard San Francisco Ca. USA more about sqb http://www.google.com/profiles/sbarncar ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Pierre Sahores
Good to know too. Thanks ! Le 18 janv. 2013 à 04:53, stephen barncard a écrit : Vimeo, than to depend on one's own servers. $60/year buys up to 5 gigs of video a month. -- Pierre Sahores mobile : 06 03 95 77 70 www.sahores-conseil.com ___

Re: More about audio-video

2013-01-17 Thread Phil Davis
One tool l I have found to be almost magical in its media conversion capabilities is ffmpeg. It's open source, cross-platform, command-line only, but is used as the engine in a number of commercial apps. Also, it has a serious learning curve. But a good tool if it's what you need. We use it