On 08/21/2015 03:07 AM, AndyP wrote:
Preview image
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/file/n4695469/lcwrapper1.png
When Im happy with it Ill make it available for hacking Open source.
Finally went and took a look - that's quite a nice start.
I'm looking forward to that release.
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 at 16:49, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com
wrote:
With the IDE things are even better: it's already written in a
high-level scripting language. Why not use LiveCode Script?
If we can't build a good text editor in LiveCode, what are any of us
doing here?
That
On Aug 20, 2015, at 11:49 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Ali Lloyd wrote:
I doubt we will be writing a whole new script editor from scratch in one
go.
Wise, for all the reasons Joel talks about here (good link, Scott):
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog69.html
This is why I'm
Ali Lloyd wrote:
I don't think that the current script editor should be neglected
I think that depends on when 7 will be EOLed. If you plan to have 8 stable by
the end of the year and you plan to have a new Script editor there, wasting
resources might be indeed a waste.
Mike Kerner wrote:
There are SO MANY things that can, and, in my opinion, should happen with
a/the script editor, that I often wonder if instead of working on one,
effort should instead be spent on a BBEdit/TextWrangler plugin or some
method for leveraging someone else's text editor.
Bootstrapping is an
Wold it be possible or even practical to use the atom editor passing info
back and forth to LC thus separating LC from the editor so only one instance
of the engine is required to be running ?
No idea how to do this, just throwing it in for discussion.
-
Andy Piddock
My software never
Malte Brill wrote:
Ali Lloyd wrote:
I don't think that the current script editor should be neglected
I think that depends on when 7 will be EOLed. If you plan to have 8
stable by the end of the year and you plan to have a new Script
editor there, wasting resources might be indeed a waste.
Ali Lloyd wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 at 16:49, Richard Gaskin wrote:
With the IDE things are even better: it's already written in a
high-level scripting language. Why not use LiveCode Script?
If we can't build a good text editor in LiveCode, what are any of us
doing here?
That is a
That should have read ...ISN'T even out of beta...
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX/UI Design
On 8/21/15, 12:46 AM, Scott Rossi sc...@tactilemedia.com wrote:
Sorry Paul, Mobirise is even out of beta and it's already obsolete:
https://vimeo.com/127926346
Admittedly,
On 21/08/15 10:38, Paul Richards wrote:
Not a CMS builder, but a drag drop webpage builder - to quote No coding
free
http://mobirise.com/
Paul :-)
All a bit too complicated for simple folk like me, I stick with KompoZer:
http://kompozer.net/ http://kompozer.net/
Richmond.
I've been playing around with IDE and have built a simple wrapper stack which
just pulls in the existing LC IDE stacks into the wrapper, copies the LC IDE
menu and has a few extra buttons to turn the standard LC Tools and Menu
pallets on and off. No mods are required to the existing IDE stacks and
@lists.runrev.com
Subject: Re: Open Source Kickstarter Report Card
Here we go: Just 3 minutes ago, I received a announcement from Webflow for
their new visual CMS:
https://webflow.com/cms
Building without programming is a popular trend :-)
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media
Source Kickstarter Report Card
Here we go: Just 3 minutes ago, I received a announcement from Webflow
for their new visual CMS:
https://webflow.com/cms
Building without programming is a popular trend :-)
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX/UI Design
On 8/19/15, 8:35 AM
:-( Thanks Scott,
PageCloud certainly looks a great tool
Paul
-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Rossi
Sent: 21 August 2015 08:51
To: LiveCode Mail List use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Subject: Re: Open Source
Thank you for the update on progress and reasons for the delay.
When you outline all the reasons, the delay is understandable.
The problem, as I see it, is that until a better IDE is released the new
user
just sees a poorly executed environment without basic features. The new
user
does
Ali Lloyd wrote:
I doubt we will be writing a whole new script editor from scratch in one
go. More likely we will replace individual elements with widgets (as has
been done with the variables pane) to make sure all the components work as
expected.
Assuming one of the elements to be replaced
Assuming one of the elements to be replaced with widgets is the field
control used to display code in the script editor, will it result in the
following long-standing scrolling issue (opened since March 2008) being
resolved?
http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6286
Scrolling a
I imagine you meant that it’s faster to program in, as opposed to faster
performance.
On Aug 20, 2015, at 1:29 PM, Kevin Miller ke...@livecode.com wrote:
Now we have a third choice, an intermediate
LiveCode Builder. Its much faster than C but slower than Script.
One thing that would really help with
developing in LCB would be to have
some examples of C++ code and the
same code showing how you write it
using LCB.
John Balgenorth
On Aug 20, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Roger Eller roger.e.el...@sealedair.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Kevin Miller
I think this is a really important principal. Always use the highest level
language you can for any given project. Offering that very high level
language option is a big part of LiveCode's reason for being.
Previously our primary choices were between LiveCode Script and a lower
level language
Yes. I was talking about developer productivity.
On 20 Aug 2015, at 18:32, Colin Holgate colinholg...@gmail.com wrote:
I imagine you meant that it’s faster to program in, as opposed to faster
performance.
On Aug 20, 2015, at 1:29 PM, Kevin Miller ke...@livecode.com wrote:
Now we
There is documentation up in the DP of 8 that is out there.
We will be having a Global Jam shortly so everyone can get together to
learn how to create Widgets. Stay tuned for more details.
Kind regards,
Kevin
Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can
When I asked, Will there be a list, or guide to help a LC script user to
know when to use LCB?, I did not understand that you were talking about
dev time -vs- cpu time per type of function.
So, nevermind that question.
Roger EllerGraphics Systems Analyst
803 North Maple StreetP:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Kevin Miller ke...@livecode.com wrote:
I think this is a really important principal. Always use the highest level
language you can for any given project. Offering that very high level
language option is a big part of LiveCode's reason for being.
Or primary
Ali Lloyd wrote:
I doubt we will be writing a whole new script editor from scratch in one
go.
Wise, for all the reasons Joel talks about here (good link, Scott):
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog69.html
More likely we will replace individual elements with widgets (as has
Speaking of workflows, we use a product called Automation Engine in our
prepress shop. You may not think programming when you hear the word
prepress, but with AE, that is exactly what it is. We take business
logic, and map it to tasks, loops, forks, file io, error handlers, etc.
with a graphical
Here we go: Just 3 minutes ago, I received a announcement from Webflow for
their new visual CMS:
https://webflow.com/cms
Building without programming is a popular trend :-)
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX/UI Design
On 8/19/15, 8:35 AM, Scott Rossi
This kind of visual drag-and-drop programming UI has been done (and will
continue to be done) for decades, and works pretty well for simple logic.
The whole build without writing code concept is pretty big right now.
But visual programming becomes unwieldy and difficult to follow when logic
gets
Good for beginners, yes. But also for speciaized areas of a workflow, like
navigation defaults. I didn't say lets make a UI that doesn't require any
code. The Automation Engine I use has tasks that are for specialty
purposes, but also within this workflow environment you can add a external
task
This kind of visual drag-and-drop programming UI has been
done (and will continue to be done) for decades, and works
pretty well for simple logic.
Flashback:
http://www.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.10/10.11/PrographCPXTutorial/ind
ex.html
Remember this?
Very interesting concept at the
On Aug 19, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Lynn Fredricks lfredri...@proactive-intl.com
wrote:
This kind of visual drag-and-drop programming UI has been
done (and will continue to be done) for decades, and works
pretty well for simple logic.
Flashback:
Never used it, but yeah.
I was thinking of something like MTropolis which wasn't really free form,
but similar.
http://www.gamutart.com/motion/interactivity/muntadss_mtropoli_view.gif
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX/UI Design
On 8/19/15, 10:40 AM, Lynn Fredricks
Ali Lloyd wrote:
As far as I'm concerned these have all been strict prerequisites
for any genuine progress on modernisation and usability improvements
of the IDE.
The biggest current roadblock is the script editor which is large and
dense, and the debugger.
Excellent progress. With that
Ah . . . at last I found the term I was looking for that describes
that picture:
https://ksr-ugc.imgix.net/assets/000/343/164/117dbdeb72106130b0c233e454653d14_original.png?v=1358445536w=680fit=maxauto=formatlossless=trues=b51b389fb4ab85d0e86d29ecafb66656
a Single Document Interface.
A few words on the IDE:
Although we've not been able to prioritise IDE development in the 8.0
cycle, a great deal of work has been done and groundwork for future
improvement laid.
Firstly, a fair portion of that work has gone into supporting widgets, both
in terms of their integration in the IDE
Am 19.08.2015 um 20:31 schrieb Scott Rossi sc...@tactilemedia.com:
Never used it, but yeah.
I was thinking of something like MTropolis which wasn't really free form,
but similar.
Thinking of mTropolis brings tears to my eyes. A great tool with a really sad
end. Shame on you Quark Inc. !
Richmond said:
Of course this is all about taste (meaning
it's all in the mouth) so it would seem best,
if an all-in-one IDE like the VB6 one is to
be introduced to have it as one of 2 options.
Single vs multi window does not matter as long as the editor is up to scratch
and I can view
Excellent progress. With that foundational work out of the way it would
seem an excellent time to optimize the most important part of the IDE,
the script editor.
Version 7 is where the company makes money today, and as the foundation
for v8 it's also where the company will make its money
Sorry, it seems part of that accidentally became a quote.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
On 08/19/2015 11:17 AM, Stephen MacLean wrote:
Wow, that is a flash back!
Indeed. I believe I still have a Prograph CD around somewhere because I
just couldn't bear to part with it.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing
Ah memories indeed.
Prograph still exists (and works on current OSX) albeit as a project of love.
http://www.andescotia.com/products/marten/
As for Metropolis, unfortunately not. Bought and killed.
James
___
use-livecode mailing list
Hello Peter,
Any chance of some basic improvements like edit bookmarks, or find and replace
in text selections, with better keyboard shortcuts before Intelligent Code
Completion?
Peter TB Brett said:
My *guess* is that we'll have something
basic out by the end of the year
--
Scott McDonald
Am 18.08.2015 um 04:45 schrieb Peter W A Wood peterwaw...@gmail.com:
There have been quite a few comments and clearly a number of different views
amongst members of the community. I would like to add my perspective.
The LiveCode Kickstarter campaign was very unusual in that the
If your app includes FOSS, it must not cause any
non-FOSS Microsoft
software to become subject to the terms of any FOSS license.
Although Microsoft didn't name it, it's talking about GPL.
But is it? GPL v2 and v3 are both on the OSI list of approved
licenses (whatever that
Richard said:
All the cool new greenfield stuff will
be just a playground for an aging
audience of a fixed size if newcomers are
disappointed with very basic
essentials.
That's the thing, because I know how *awesome* LiveCode is, I have been willing
to put up with the IDE as it stands.
LIVECODE KICKSTARTER REPORT CARD -Version 4
The first thing to note is that LiveCode Ltd has open-sourced LiveCode under
the GPL licence. It is freely accessible on Github.
The second thing to note is that the majority of the Kickstarter rewards have
been delivered. Only delivery of printed
Matthias
On 18 Aug 2015, at 14:32, Matthias Rebbe | M-R-D
matthias_livecode_150...@m-r-d.de wrote:
Am 18.08.2015 um 04:45 schrieb Peter W A Wood peterwaw...@gmail.com:
There have been quite a few comments and clearly a number of different views
amongst members of the community. I
On 18 Aug 2015, at 13:33, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:
If Kevin made me IDE Czar […]
I, for one, welcome our new IDE overlord ;)
Fraser
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe,
On 18/08/15 06:58, RunRevPlanet wrote:
Peter said:
I have no doubt that these promises
were very genuine. Clearly, LiveCode
hasn’t been able to deliver them in
the time they expected.
I never doubt the sincerity of LiveCode Ltd. and the team behind it.
I don't think anyone is
You'd think that a software company would make the dictionary available as
a searchable e-book too, if not an actual mobile app for all supported
platforms, and made with LiveCode itself.
On Aug 18, 2015 3:22 AM, Peter W A Wood peterwaw...@gmail.com wrote:
LIVECODE KICKSTARTER REPORT CARD
On 18/08/15 05:12, Peter W A Wood wrote:
I have updated my KickStarter report card thanks to the information about the
new player for Windows being planned for LiveCode 8.0 that Tom Bodine kindly
provided.
As I understand, the phrase “new visual editor” refers to the new IDE.
LIVECODE
On 18/08/15 03:13, Richard Gaskin wrote:
RunRevPlanet wrote:
Richard Gaskin wrote:
RunRevPlanet wrote:
I understand that things take longer than expected, but when I read
the Kickstarter Campaign it is clear that the new IDE is a core
part of the next generation. It is not a stretch goal,
Richmond
Does after LiveCode 8 mean 8.1 or does it mean 9 or maybe 10? Because
that could make quite a difference.
It means that I don’t think it is going to be in any of the LiveCode 8.xx
releases based on my memory of snippets of information on this list and in the
forums. (Which could
On 18/08/15 16:07, Peter W A Wood wrote:
Richmond
Does after LiveCode 8 mean 8.1 or does it mean 9 or maybe 10? Because
that could make quite a difference.
It means that I don’t think it is going to be in any of the LiveCode 8.xx
releases based on my memory of snippets of information on
I'm messing around, as one does, in a scaffy carpark attached to the
Conservatoire in Sofia, Bulgaria, having thrown one son on a plane to the
States and waiting for the other from Germany.
But I digress . .
Reading a book from 1999 about Visual Basic 6 . . .
AND what do I see? The Visual
Richmond said:
I'd be interested to know where one can
find these usability standards, and by
whom they are authorised to be 'standards'
I know of no single website to visit that lists usability standards.
When I think of such a concept, it is more about tools working in a way that I
do
I like the IDE set-up arrangement as it is with the floating panes. It is an
especially workable when using a two monitor set-up. If the single view
arrangement were to be implemented in a new IDE then the option to un-dock
the script editor at the bare minimum should be an option.
I agree that
I totally agree, I use Photoshop dialy and while I’m quite happy with a one
window type of environment for image editing I really don’t feel it would be
appropriate for app development.
However, there are some areas that I feel could be improved in the LC IDE, so I
wrote my own plugin to help
On 19 Aug 2015, at 3:22 pm, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
The Viewer widget needed for that UI will be very nice for us, but I fear
making an IDE based around it, as it would no longer be truly LIVE CODE.
I agree, personally I’d like a full screen script editor with an
On 18 Aug 2015, at 7:27 am, Lyn Teyla lyn.te...@gmail.com wrote:
It's listed (under 'Add Ons you can get with credits') as Business-only on
the pricing page:
https://livecode.com/products/livecode-platform/pricing/
https://livecode.com/products/livecode-platform/pricing/
Ah… I see.
Irrespective of things taking longer
that forecast (or desired)
I understand that things take longer than expected, but when I read the
Kickstarter Campaign it is clear that the new IDE is a core part of the next
generation. It is not a stretch goal, and is repeatedly emphasised as a core
On 17/08/15 09:22, Peter TB Brett wrote:
On 2015-08-17 04:30, Roger Eller wrote:
I am surprised that anyone would expect a lot of coding help to rise
out of
the LC community. Sure there are a few who have experience in the lower
level languages, but my sole reason in choosing LC was for the
At the time of the Kickstarter campaign was not made explicit.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553
Installer Maker for LiveCode:
http://qery.us/468
On 17/08/15 13:16, Mark Schonewille wrote:
At the time of the Kickstarter campaign was not made explicit.
+1
Indeed.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK:
On 18 Aug 2015, at 8:19 am, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
It would seem what they showed then was less advanced than what anyone here
would need. And since you know of a good library that's cross-platform with
compatible licensing you're ahead of them.
Actually no.
I had a one-on-one with Mark at RR14. We talked about PDF support. We discussed
a widget using PDFium. Mark and the team are well aware of the need of PDF
support. I'm sure it's on the hot list.
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
RunRevPlanet wrote:
Richard Gaskin wrote:
RunRevPlanet wrote:
I understand that things take longer than expected, but when I read
the Kickstarter Campaign it is clear that the new IDE is a core
part of the next generation. It is not a stretch goal, and is
repeatedly emphasised as a core
I have never used LiveCode Builder, IIRC.
so I don’t know what it takes to help.
John Balgenorth
On Aug 17, 2015, at 6:51 PM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
JB wrote:
How hard can it be to add pdf support to open-source?
Technically, it's a matter of copying the GPLv3
Windows 8? No. 10? Yeah probably. If LC can be updated to be compliant
with the UAP (universal app platform) If I understand correctly, dong that
means it'll run on win 10, win 10 phones etc. Not sure how the backwards
compatibility works though, and its possible I am way off base here too.
On
I am using LiveCode 8.0 DP2 as my baseline, as I understand it to be the future
and not the 7.0 series. And my comments are from a Windows perspective.
Richard said:
What usability standards do you feel are
not well reflected in the current IDE,
and if Kevin made you IDE Czar tomorrow
Thanks for the info. I did not know
what PDFium was and I have never
programmed a widget either.
As you can see I am very limited at
moment.
John Balgenorth
On Aug 17, 2015, at 7:37 PM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com wrote:
On 18 Aug 2015, at 11:50 am, Ralph DiMola
On 18 Aug 2015, at 1:36 pm, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
3. Support of Multiple targets (like Xcode)
What are multiple targets in an IDE?
I’m guessing he means being able to have more than one set of standalone
settings as a named target. You could include different
Peter said:
I have no doubt that these promises
were very genuine. Clearly, LiveCode
hasnt been able to deliver them in
the time they expected.
I never doubt the sincerity of LiveCode Ltd. and the team behind it.
But when a major feature which would be a tangible improvement for
Ia rhea what you mean by PDF specs?
PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT (PDF) SPECIFICATIONS
Technical Specifications Document
John Balgenorth
On Aug 17, 2015, at 7:37 PM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com wrote:
On 18 Aug 2015, at 11:50 am, Ralph DiMola rdim...@evergreeninfo.net wrote:
Richard
On 18 Aug 2015, at 08:13, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
What usability standards do you feel are not well reflected in the current
IDE, and if Kevin made you IDE Czar tomorrow what are the first three things
you'd do to fix that?
1. Intelligent Code Completion
Monte Goulding wrote:
On 18 Aug 2015, at 11:04 am, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Where? Maybe my coffee's worn off, but I can't find a dollar
value for points on that page.
Add Ons you can get with credits.
20 credits are included with every business license. Spend your
credits on these list of
Monte
On 18 Aug 2015, at 10:52, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com wrote:
On 18 Aug 2015, at 12:45 pm, Peter W A Wood peterwaw...@gmail.com wrote:
PS Does anybody still think it is worth LiveCode supporting Windows 8 Phone?
Nope… I presume the goal will be bumped to Windows
I think MS learned a valuable lesson from RT with its limited subset of
apps written for the ARM CPU. Modern MS tablets are using the new
quad-core Atom which is Intel. It will even run LiveCode on a tablet! If
Windows phone does the same, there's no reason not to support it.
On Aug 17, 2015
On Aug 17, 2015, at 3:19 PM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
This implies that anyone using a proprietary license should be able to obtain
this, and the other add-ons there, as a separate purchase. But since no
pricing is available for any of them in any currency other
On 18 Aug 2015, at 9:33 am, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
wrote:
t’s quite possible that they could release all the add ons you can buy with
your credits as dual license but just not include them (extra credits) in the
Indy license
Hmm… looking at the page a bit more I see
-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
Of JB
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 9:41 PM
To: How to use LiveCode
Subject: Re: Open Source Kickstarter Report Card
How hard can it be to add pdf support to open-source?
I read the PDF spec
On 18 Aug 2015, at 11:50 am, Ralph DiMola rdim...@evergreeninfo.net wrote:
How hard can it be to add pdf support to open-source?
I read the PDF spec and got a headache on the 3 page. I know that PDFium is
doing the heavy lifting but the PDF spec is nasty. Add bookmarks, PDF fields
and
There have been quite a few comments and clearly a number of different views
amongst members of the community. I would like to add my perspective.
The LiveCode Kickstarter campaign was very unusual in that the LiveCode could
fulfil all of the rewards without actually having to complete the
Peter W A Wood wrote:
On 18 Aug 2015, at 08:13, Richard Gaskin wrote:
What usability standards do you feel are not well reflected in the
current IDE, and if Kevin made you IDE Czar tomorrow what are the
first three things you'd do to fix that?
1. Intelligent Code Completion (like
Monte Goulding wrote:
On 18 Aug 2015, at 7:21 am, Richard Gaskin wrote:
On the one hand I don't recall any specific promises made about
PDF rendering in terms of licensing, but on the other hand that
PDF widget was the example used in Kevin's video from July 2014
to demonstrate the v8
On 18 Aug 2015, at 11:04 am, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com
wrote:
Where? Maybe my coffee's worn off, but I can't find a dollar value for
points on that page.
Add Ons you can get with credits.
20 credits are included with every business license. Spend your credits on
these
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 9:41 PM
To: How to use LiveCode
Subject: Re: Open Source Kickstarter Report Card
How hard can it be to add pdf support to open-source?
I read the PDF spec and got a headache on the 3 page. I know that PDFium is
doing the heavy lifting but the PDF spec is nasty
Everyone said PDF support will be available
for 1 credit. So you got your wish.
Now they want to know if the indy license will
include it.
John Balgenorth
On Aug 17, 2015, at 5:02 PM, Ralph DiMola rdim...@evergreeninfo.net wrote:
I had a one-on-one with Mark at RR14. We talked about PDF
I think your question about the indy license
including the listed PDF support has been
answered in that statement.
The key word is exclusive.
It looks like open-source needs to step up
on their own.
John Balgenorth
On Aug 17, 2015, at 6:14 PM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
How hard can it be to add pdf support to
open-source?
I assume the code is in C++ or Obhective-C.
I am not a C programmer but I have learned
a little about it and might be willing to help.
First of all you would need to understand I am
not completely up to par on C so I would need
some help and
Peter W A Wood wrote:
After all, it looks to me that you cannot sell GPL licensed software
through the Windows App Store
I couldn't find anything definitive on that. I did find some older
articles about Win8 licensing suggesting FOSS was prohibited, but I also
found this one from 2011
I forgot to add the most important promise … LiveCode being open-sourced … as
kindly pointed out by Jacque Landman Gay.
LIVECODE KICKSTARTER REPORT CARD
The first thing to note is that all the Kickstarter rewards have been delivered.
The second thing to note is that LiveCode has open-sourced
On 18 Aug 2015, at 12:45 pm, Peter W A Wood peterwaw...@gmail.com wrote:
PS Does anybody still think it is worth LiveCode supporting Windows 8 Phone?
Nope… I presume the goal will be bumped to Windows 10???
___
use-livecode mailing list
Monte Goulding wrote:
The page states that a credit has a value of $99.
Where? Maybe my coffee's worn off, but I can't find a dollar value for
points on that page.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
JB wrote:
How hard can it be to add pdf support to open-source?
Technically, it's a matter of copying the GPLv3 license file into that
repository, and adding an appropriate note to the main source file.
It seems the considerations here aren't technical.
I assume the code is in C++ or
Peter W A Wood wrote:
Does anybody still think it is worth LiveCode supporting Windows
8 Phone?
If you and I bought Win8 phones to test with we'd double the installed
base. :)
I don't think there's a need for Win *phone* per se, but we do need
touch support on Windows, and Ubuntu as well,
On 18 Aug 2015, at 11:29, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
Peter W A Wood wrote:
After all, it looks to me that you cannot sell GPL licensed software
through the Windows App Store
I couldn't find anything definitive on that. I did find some older articles
about
Thank you Richmond:
OH! Where is the unified IDE that was waved around
during the Kickstarter thing, and doesn't seem to
have come up on the 'Report Card'?
During the Kickstarter Campaign it quite plainly says under the heading of, What
is your money going toward?
We will introduce a new
snip
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1755283828/open-source-edition-of-livecode/description
snip
Fall 2013 Final Delivery
2 years behind completion.
Richmond.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url
RunRevPlanet wrote:
Thank you Richmond:
OH! Where is the unified IDE that was waved around
during the Kickstarter thing, and doesn't seem to
have come up on the 'Report Card'?
During the Kickstarter Campaign it quite plainly says under the heading of, What
is your money going toward?
We
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
