Re: Suggestions for LiveCode (the company) to increase its revenue

Allowing non hacky 2 way communication with JavaScript via lc browser is a potentially huge win should it ever happen. Every time I come across technical discussion of making web apps for the desktop there is a huge chorus or discontent with the currently most viable option Electron - an

Re: Suggestions for LiveCode (the company) to increase its revenue

Me too - I have found the whole process to be irritating and messy. As I have ranted before, deployment issues are really huge for people who see software design and programming as what they do, and having made their software function, just want to deliver it. But to do that, you have to hack

Re: Suggestions for LiveCode (the company) to increase its revenue

I would pay for that right now, if LC provided code signing. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 16, 2017, at 11:20 AM, tbodine via use-livecode > wrote: > > Code signing can be a major pain point. Adding code-signing features to > Livecode (or in a supplemental tool)

Re: Suggestions for LiveCode (the company) to increase its revenue

Code signing can be a major pain point. Adding code-signing features to Livecode (or in a supplemental tool) could be a selling point for Indy and Business license users. I pay about $50 annually for a third-party code-signing tool subscription on the Mac platform. LiveCode Ltd may able be able

Suggestions for LiveCode (the company) to increase its revenue

Everyone who uses LiveCode benefits if the company grows and thus is able to improve the product faster. I thought some of us might have original ideas that could help the company. If nothing else, we might give them useful ideas. So... 1. What offerings would you pay for, in addition to any