Meanwhile Bjornke has come up with a way to convert the doc files into
a SQLite database, and that makes it faster, more maintainable, easier
to use, and more flexible. Unfortunately his converter doesn't work on
linux, but the resulting database is cross-platform.
I can't really test on
/html-tags-recognized-by-htmlText-tp4668935p4669072.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
How do you find this stuff! Seems there's a whole genre of similar Youtube
clips.
Pete
lcSQL Software http://www.lcsql.com
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Richard Gaskin
ambassa...@fourthworld.comwrote:
Peter Haworth wrote:
Mark,
You said:
Best thing to do is fork the repository, git
I did indeed and thanks for the link. Even though I didn't understand your
instructions, I was able to download the dictionary editor stack and look
forward to checking out how the dictionary works and its structure.
Pete
lcSQL Software http://www.lcsql.com
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:07 PM,
Peter Haworth wrote:
How do you find this stuff! Seems there's a whole genre of similar Youtube
clips.
Jeanne DeVoto turned me on to those. Every now and then someone makes
another, and the git one popped up on my G+ feed recently.
Internet traffic is divided in four equal parts: spam,
Pete-
Thursday, August 22, 2013, 10:21:57 AM, you wrote:
I did indeed and thanks for the link. Even though I didn't understand your
instructions, I was able to download the dictionary editor stack and look
forward to checking out how the dictionary works and its structure.
Yeah, good luck
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net wrote:
Meanwhile Bjornke has come up with a way to convert the doc files into
a SQLite database, and that makes it faster, more maintainable, easier
to use, and more flexible. Unfortunately his converter doesn't work on
Pete-
Thursday, August 22, 2013, 4:15:29 PM, you wrote:
Yes, I use Docu 2 almost exclusively in place of the built in dictionary
and have looked at Bjornke's code that builds the database. The dictionary
format looks to be, shall we say, interesting.
ROTFL
Out of interest why doesn't the
I recently discovered that, contrary to the dictionary entry, htmlText
supports any of the standard html entities like para;, %crarr;, etc
With that in mind, does anyone know if the list of supported html tags in
the dictionary is complete? It lists the following:
p
sub
sup
i
b
strike
u
box
On Aug 20, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
I recently discovered that, contrary to the dictionary entry, htmlText
supports any of the standard html entities like para;, %crarr;, etc
With that in mind, does anyone know if the list of supported html tags in
the dictionary is complete?
On 8/20/13 3:17 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
I recently discovered that, contrary to the dictionary entry, htmlText
supports any of the standard html entities like para;, %crarr;, etc
With that in mind, does anyone know if the list of supported html tags in
the dictionary is complete? It lists the
On Aug 20, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Devin Asay wrote:
On Aug 20, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
I recently discovered that, contrary to the dictionary entry, htmlText
supports any of the standard html entities like para;, %crarr;, etc
With that in mind, does anyone know if the list of
Thanks Devin. I guess I'll have to go through the release notes and try to
glean what I can from them.
I know there was a recent thread about the poor quality of the LC docs
which included some reasons why it won;t get updated until the whole open
source thing settles down. I really hope going
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Devin Asay devin_a...@byu.edu wrote:
There may be others. I've done a lot of experimenting with html formatted
text, which I use to set the htmltext of a field, and then I observe what
works. Then you can reverse the process and 'put the htmlText' of the
field
Pete-
Tuesday, August 20, 2013, 2:31:42 PM, you wrote:
On the subject of open source, is there a process in place to get
contributed enhancements included in the docs? I see lots of cool stuff
being discussed on the forum that involve new commands and properties.
Here's the docs editor.
Mark,
You said:
Best thing to do is fork the repository, git clone it locally, make
your changes, push them, and submit a pull request.
I heard :
Best thing to do is jwehf KJHFKHFTYL *%*%$$$ kjdkhdkjhd pull request
:-)
Pete
lcSQL Software http://www.lcsql.com
Peter Haworth p...@lcsql.com wrote:
Mark,
You said:
Best thing to do is fork the repository, git clone it locally, make
your changes, push them, and submit a pull request.
I heard :
Best thing to do is jwehf KJHFKHFTYL *%*%$$$ kjdkhdkjhd pull request
I think he said you can push a clone
Peter Haworth wrote:
Mark,
You said:
Best thing to do is fork the repository, git clone it locally, make
your changes, push them, and submit a pull request.
I heard :
Best thing to do is jwehf KJHFKHFTYL *%*%$$$ kjdkhdkjhd pull request
:-)
Cut to Godwin's Law:
Pete-
Tuesday, August 20, 2013, 6:18:48 PM, you wrote:
I heard :
Best thing to do is jwehf KJHFKHFTYL *%*%$$$ kjdkhdkjhd pull request
Well, hey... you asked...
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-livecode mailing list
Richard-
Tuesday, August 20, 2013, 6:27:20 PM, you wrote:
Cut to Godwin's Law:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDeG4S-mJts
:)
Oh my. Thanks for that.
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-livecode mailing list
20 matches
Mail list logo
