Re: inheriting a custom property from a supergroup ("effective" custom property)

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: > Actually if not being set has value then I don't think you want effective > either. I think you need a property on any parent that should be ignored > when recursing through the hierarchy. > Ack. You're right;that's

Re: inheriting a custom property from a supergroup ("effective" custom property)

Actually if not being set has value then I don't think you want effective either. I think you need a property on any parent that should be ignored when recursing through the hierarchy. Sent from my iPhone > On 28 Apr 2016, at 9:49 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: > > I suppose that

inheriting a custom property from a supergroup ("effective" custom property)

I have an id number, call it unDna, for entries in my database. When elements are displayed or manipulated, either the card or the group I've placed has unDna set as a custom property. The handlers for close field check for a unDna of the field or the owner of a field. This backfires, though,