Re: do. command. safety. ?
J. Landman Gay wrote: > Thanks for the examples, Alex and Richard. I did understand the > principle behind the caution but I couldn't get any of my tests to > produce bad results. Both your examples do that. > > I think the problem was that I wasn't being imaginative enough. You were just thinking constructively. You look for outcomes that benefit people. That's a good perspective to have. Most devs do. Maliciously breaking things requires a different mindset. -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Systems Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web ambassa...@fourthworld.comhttp://www.FourthWorld.com ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Re: do. command. safety. ?
So next time I'd better hire one of you guys, looks like. Malice isn't my strong point. Except maybe for certain distant relatives. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On April 1, 2018 5:42:26 PM Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote: On 04/01/2018 11:40 AM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote: Thanks for the examples, Alex and Richard. I did understand the principle behind the caution but I couldn't get any of my tests to produce bad results. Both your examples do that. I think the problem was that I wasn't being imaginative enough. Yep. That's the problem with security coding - you have to be more imaginative keeping out of trouble than the imaginative folks who are looking for ways to cause mischief. -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Re: do. command. safety. ?
On 04/01/2018 11:40 AM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote: Thanks for the examples, Alex and Richard. I did understand the principle behind the caution but I couldn't get any of my tests to produce bad results. Both your examples do that. I think the problem was that I wasn't being imaginative enough. Yep. That's the problem with security coding - you have to be more imaginative keeping out of trouble than the imaginative folks who are looking for ways to cause mischief. -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Re: do. command. safety. ?
Thanks for the examples, Alex and Richard. I did understand the principle behind the caution but I couldn't get any of my tests to produce bad results. Both your examples do that. I think the problem was that I wasn't being imaginative enough. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode