Re: Drag Drop State of Affairs

I filed a bug report #21474 --- Marty > On Aug 7, 2018, at 2:47 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode > wrote: > > No, and the topStack is the same before and after, which is the stack I am > drag/dropping onto. Curiously, I cannot think of a

Intersect outputs different result in desktop and LC server

Hi list, As the title says, I am getting different results when running the script below with LC desktop and LC server (on-rev account)... The result is fine on desktop, but flawed on server. What am I missing ? Thanks in advance. jbv on mouseUp get "3622 4141 4288 5378 38090 8786 13439 16483

Re: valueDiff for arrays?

On 08/08/2018 10:54 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: Yup - but isSequence would be correct - false. The extents might be 1,10 But isSequence would check whether it was 1,9 ... Ah. OK, but I was actually replying to Dick Kriesel's isSequence function, which incorrectly would reply

find Regular Expression function in LC editor and/or IDE

using LC Business v8.1.9 on Windows 7 Pro and/or LC Business v9.0 on Mac 10.12.6 in the Message Box, put: put " put x into y" into x; put matchText(x,"^\s(put)?((?!into).)*$") produces "false" in the Message Box, put: put "put x" into x; put

Re: LC Builder and 3rd Part DLLs under Windows

> Am 08.08.2018 um 21:17 schrieb Mark Waddingham via use-livecode > : > > > You might also find this thread in the forums useful with your efforts: > > http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=93=30429 > > Its about wrapping a Windows DLL which accesses a I/O device of some sort - > the

Re: Drag Drop State of Affairs

Thanks Marty. I didn't because I cannot provide a way to reliably reproduce it. I will bump it. Bob S > On Aug 8, 2018, at 14:00 , Knapp Martin via use-livecode > wrote: > > I filed a bug report #21474 > > --- > Marty

Re: Intersect outputs different result in desktop and LC server

Which versions of LC are you running in each case ? Alex. On 08/08/2018 22:29, jbv via use-livecode wrote: Hi list, As the title says, I am getting different results when running the script below with LC desktop and LC server (on-rev account)... The result is fine on desktop, but flawed on

Re: Intersect outputs different result in desktop and LC server

Alex Tweedly wrote: > With LC7 server on on-rev, I get > > 4141 5378 18699 28365 41200 50230 58901 62983 63416 65984 71574 73426 > 74288 112360 115826 121386 126039 141224 > > while with LC9 server on on-rev I get > > 4141 Looks like a bug got fixed:

A few solutions to problems I had

I needed to refresh an app today, not one in any store, just a utility app I made for a friend. It didn’t go easily! First issue was that between my old MacBook Pro running macOS 10.14, and my new MacBook Pro running 10.13.6, I couldn’t find a combination of LiveCode and Xcode that would work.

Re: valueDiff for arrays?

On 2018-08-08 23:19, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote: On 08/08/2018 10:54 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: Yup - but isSequence would be correct - false. The extents might be 1,10 But isSequence would check whether it was 1,9 ... Ah. OK, but I was actually replying to Dick

Re: LC Builder and 3rd Part DLLs under Windows

On 2018-08-08 22:50, Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode wrote: Thanks for the update. Now i do not have to ask at the next LC Global. ;) That is why I though it was worth mentioning it now ;) Warmest Regards, Mark. -- Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/ LiveCode:

Re: Intersect outputs different result in desktop and LC server

Oops - sent before I meant to ... With LC7 server on on-rev, I get 4141 5378 18699 28365 41200 50230 58901 62983 63416 65984 71574 73426 74288 112360 115826 121386 126039 141224 while with LC9 server on on-rev I get 4141 -- Alex. On 08/08/2018 23:19, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:

Re: valueDiff for arrays?

On 08/08/2018 04:16 PM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: OK. Bug filed. https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=21476 -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url

Re: searching lists.runrev.com

Douglas Ruisaard wrote: > When I try to use the link: > > http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:lists.runrev.com > > with ANY choice of "last update"... the search NEVER finds anything... > no matter what word(s) I use in the "all these words" or "this exact > word or phrase"... > > AND >

Elvis has left the building

Looking at git activity I noticed (there isn’t much actually) that Fraser hasn’t done anything this year. Went over to the LiveCode site to “meet the team” and sure enough, no Fraser. Another departure of a longtime ‘colleague’ without a goodbye.

Re: Intersect outputs different result in desktop and LC server

How do you run LC9 server on on-rev ? Thanks. On Thu, August 9, 2018 1:40 am, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote: > Oops - sent before I meant to ... > > > With LC7 server on on-rev, I get > > > 4141 5378 18699 28365 41200 50230 58901 62983 63416 65984 71574 73426 > 74288 112360 115826 121386

Re: searching lists.runrev.com

Another similar resource: https://www.mail-archive.com/use-livecode@lists.runrev.com/ Phil Davis On 8/8/18 8:08 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: Douglas Ruisaard wrote: > When I try to use the link: > > http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:lists.runrev.com > > with ANY

searching lists.runrev.com

Not exactly an LC question... but relevant to this group... When I try to use the link: http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:lists.runrev.com with ANY choice of "last update"... the search NEVER finds anything... no matter what word(s) I use in the "all these words" or "this exact word

Re: Crash log

> On 8 Aug 2018, at 9:39 am, Knapp Martin via use-livecode > wrote: > > What is the protocol for sending crash logs to Livecode? Do I just do a bug > report or what? Just had a crash while printing in LC Business 9.0.1 Yes just file a report with what you were doing and the crash log.

Re: valueDiff for arrays

So the difference between transplant and filter is that transplant mutates both source and target by taking from source and adding to target while filter copies from source to target? Oh and that transplant would mutate an existing target rather than clobbering any existing value. Hate the

Re: valueDiff for arrays

> On 8 Aug 2018, at 7:52 pm, Monte Goulding via use-livecode > wrote: > > map lines of tList as sum(item 2 to -1 of each) \ >grouping by item 1 of each \ >where item 1 of each begins with “b” into tArray > > Would create the array: > > “bar” -> 10, “baz” -> 24 Typo ^ sorry

Re: Array converted to text in IDE...

Do you have an example of the problem? The PI uses the tree view widget and should handle arrays. The one possible issue would be if the key had a comma which could cause issues (don’t think the PI has changed to support that but I do know an update to the widget is done - pathDelimiter)

Array converted to text in IDE...

In LC9 (and probably earlier) , has anyone else been looking at custom properties of an object in the IDE and accidentally converted an Array to text without any warning or even realizing it had happened until their application stopped working correctly? I searched the Quality Center to see if

Re: Array converted to text in IDE... [User Error!]

Never Mind. Dumb user error! ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Re: valueDiff for arrays?

On 08/08/2018 04:18 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: "the extents" implements those rules, so "isSequence" doesn’t need to. Or is there evidence "isSequence" fails? on test local i repeat with i=1 to 10 put "true" into sArray[i] end repeat put "false" into

Re: valueDiff for arrays

I'd suggest transplant is actually move - an idea which has been taken to the level of obsession in modern c++ and new languages like Rust (which I want to like - but it's highly technical demands just leave a bitter taste in my mouth - impressive, yes; the right approach - definitely not, IMHO

Re: valueDiff for arrays?

I think you are right - I will double check. There is actually an internal function (in C) - two in fact - IsSequence and IsNumericSequence which we should plumb into 'is a' to make this clearer. They basically use the extents internal impl (well an optimized form in one case). Warmest

Re: LCB Performance

You might be better off building the primes as a List, then converting to a string at the end. Although the conversion of each number is only done once so it probably doesn't make too much difference (apart from being a bit more LCBy). In general LCB should be written to prefer structure over

Option Menus (and missing features)

There have been a few email list threads recently about some long standing bugs/enhancements that it would be nice, in Post-Infinite-LiveCode world, to finally get fixed in a forth coming version of LC. I'd like to nominate to move to the top part of any list, support for menu meta characters

Re: Option Menus (and missing features)

Good list, Paul. Option controls are a fundamental control type common to all desktop OSes. I believe it helps current developers impress their audience and LC to impress potential new customers to make sure fundamentals work as expected. I would add to that list the things users commonly

Re: valueDiff for arrays?

Yup - but isSequence would be correct - false. The extents might be 1,10 But isSequence would check whether it was 1,9 ... Mark. Sent from my iPhone > On 8 Aug 2018, at 12:19, Mark Wieder via use-livecode > wrote: > > On 08/08/2018 04:18 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: > >>>

Re: LC Builder and 3rd Part DLLs under Windows

On 2018-08-08 00:11, Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode wrote: Trevor, thank you so much for your example and for verifying that LCB can execute handlers in the dll. “Good luck” is well said, i need more than good luck. ;) You might also find this thread in the forums useful with your efforts: