Always negative

2019-10-03 Thread Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
Not entirely. I can put for what I regard as a positive suggestion. Whether it is doable and makes any business sense is a big question. Stop all continuing development for a fixed period of time (6 months, say) and attempt to sort out as many of the outstanding bugs as possible. Have a

Re: Where LiveCode is Now

2019-10-03 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode
On 10/3/19 7:51 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote: Hm. The search stops at 1. Try narrowing it by date. For instance, an impressive 130 bugs resolved since the release of LC 9.0.5 on 16 May.

Re: Where LiveCode is Now

2019-10-03 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
Hm. The search stops at 1. "This list is too long for The LiveCode Quality Control Center's little mind; the Next/Prev/First/Last buttons won't appear on individual bugs." -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On October 3,

Re: Where LiveCode is Now

2019-10-03 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
You speak for me too. The only people who could say such things about LC are those who don't know them. Anyone who does know them knows that everything Richmond said is false. "Ill-informed" is putting it mildly. LC are very open to constructive criticism, but rants just make the speaker a

Re: Where LiveCode is Now

2019-10-03 Thread Tom Glod via use-livecode
Hi Heather, thanks for the update. Richmond, that was way over the top dude. I respect your right to say your peace, and not much of it rings wholly true to me. I pretty much just trust the team, last I talked to Kevin, he seemed sure of the direction that they are taking..and for nowesp

Re: Where LiveCode is Now

2019-10-03 Thread PystCat via use-livecode
Hi Heather, I can only speak for myself, however I think others might be with me on this, I think you guys ROCK! I understand the complexities involved in creating incredibly beautiful software that makes it look very easy to make other software. You make it easy for me to create easy to

Re: Subject: Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now

2019-10-03 Thread hh via use-livecode
> Sean C. wrote; > Now let me get back to fixing HTML5 for you!! Wow ... Where is the piece I missed? @Heather Every (software) kingdom needs a court jester. They have special rights and nobody should be insulted by them. (And sometimes they say, just as young children, the truth.)

Re: Recommended specs for Windows Development computer.

2019-10-03 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
I'm curious how a standalone performs. I have a standalone that saves stacks as properties are changes, and I am finding that while Windows direct host is slower than a MacOS for a lot of things, Paralles (using Shared Profile I admit) is several times slower, especially when saving the stack.

Re: Python to LiveCode

2019-10-03 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode
On 9/28/19 8:08 PM, kee nethery via use-livecode wrote: Once the code is functional, I refactored it to make it more in line with the way the destination code is typically structured. That’s what I did. Tedious but straightforward and successful. LOL. "And there we go, we've created

Re: Subject: Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now

2019-10-03 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
+1 > On Oct 3, 2019, at 12:35 , R.H. via use-livecode > wrote: > > Some of the rants are leading nowhere. > > I do not think that anybody writing as Richmond did has ever been involved > in keeping up a company with such little assumed revenue to pay from for > salaries. And I would love to

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
Heather Humbly, I think that would be a bit over the top to ban Richmond. I found it quite entertaining and somewhat truthful. I’m in quite a pleasant and rational state of mind at the moment so can look objectively at this. Having stared down the naked barrel of the gun in the hands of LC

Re: HTML5

2019-10-03 Thread hh via use-livecode
Possibly the server of your webpage is very slow. I need here at most 9-10 seconds to load a standalone the first time from http://hyperhh.de/html5 . You could load one of the latest (9.5.0 created) there and compare. Or you have conflict with SOP (same origin policy). Is your standalone trying

Re: HTML5

2019-10-03 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
Hi Alain I’m sorry to hear you are having this issue. Do you have access to the server settings to enable gzip compression. When enabled the server will compress the js files substantially so that the browser does not have to download so much and décompresses it in the client (which is much

Re: Where LiveCode is Now

2019-10-03 Thread Jeff Reynolds via use-livecode
LC team, I too so appreciate all the work the LC team has done over the years and continues to do. I’ve used probably a dozen different commercial coding systems over the decades and LC thru all it’s incarnations back to good old MetaCard with Scott was the one that provided the needed

Re: Recommended specs for Windows Development computer.

2019-10-03 Thread Colin Holgate via use-livecode
For my job I need to frequently test things in Windows 10, and I have been doing that using Parallels. It works really well, but sometimes I need to do hardware tests, and so I had Bootcamp added as well. I was curious how well it performs, and so downloaded a benchmark test program. Users who

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Heather Laine via use-livecode
Richmond - What you wrote is not just "unpleasant". It is rude, ill informed, offensive and disrespectful to LiveCode, our company, our amazingly dedicated employees, and the members of this great list. If I don't see an apology in the morning you will make history as the only person I have

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode
On 10/3/19 12:54 PM, Richmond via use-livecode wrote: And I did preface my rant with it's "Mr Mouth" ' so anyone who wanted could either ignore or disregard what I wrote. Ignore a Richmond Rant? You gotta be kidding. I live for these things. -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Iphonelagi via use-livecode
Hi Trevor I understand totally but when something was promised after crowdfunding to be ready in 3 months and three and a half years later NOTHING that is unforgivable ... If one person at Livecode spent 1 hour a day only without weekends over 3 and a half years that’s roughly 21 weeks at 5

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Richmond via use-livecode
Unpleasant rants . . . Indeed: what I write was unpleasant. There is, sometimes, a time and a place for unpleasantness, or, as some would have it, 'speaking directly.' But, as many people have said softer, more tactful things for a long time to largely no avail, it might just be that an

Subject: Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now

2019-10-03 Thread R.H. via use-livecode
Some of the rants are leading nowhere. I do not think that anybody writing as Richmond did has ever been involved in keeping up a company with such little assumed revenue to pay from for salaries. And I would love to see such guys running a company and make money. They will all fail. But to make

Re: Recommended specs for Windows Development computer.

2019-10-03 Thread JJS via use-livecode
yes you can use virtualbox or whatever but it will be slower, running an OS in an OS, or: You install bootcamp if you only need Win10: read this https://support.apple.com/nl-nl/HT201468 it's in dutch but you can find the English version yourself i think then bootcamp will install all needed

Re: Recommended specs for Windows Development computer.

2019-10-03 Thread Dar Scott Consulting via use-livecode
I have used Parallels, and am now also using Virtual Box on my Mac. I use No-Machine to connect to hardware Windows test platforms, and plan to use it for other platforms (Linux, iOS, Android, Raspberry Pi). I use MiniWoL to wake one machine and plan add Wake-on-LAN to another Windows machine.

DataGrid and scroll down refresh

2019-10-03 Thread Dan Friedman via use-livecode
Greeting! For mobile, it has become VERY common to scroll down past the top of a list to refresh the data (usually a loading wheel appears). Is there a method to accomplish this with the DataGrid? -Dan ___ use-livecode mailing list

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Erik Beugelaar via use-livecode
Brian, thanks for your quick info. Good to hear they do accept contributions and merge them in the commercial versions. On 03/10/2019, 19:55, "use-livecode on behalf of Brian Milby via use-livecode" wrote: Part of the agreement that you make when you submit a PR is that you assign

Re: Recommended specs for Windows Development computer.

2019-10-03 Thread Dalton Calford via use-livecode
Try Vmware Fusion - you can run windows without needing a dual boot - you just need a windows 10 licence. On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 14:04, Erik Beugelaar via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I would advise this hardware: > > - LGA 1152 motherboard (with PCIe ports) > -

Re: Recommended specs for Windows Development computer.

2019-10-03 Thread Erik Beugelaar via use-livecode
Hi, I would advise this hardware: - LGA 1152 motherboard (with PCIe ports) - Intel i5 processor - 8GB RAM or more - 256GB SSD or better 256GB M.2 NVMe if supported by your Mac OR use VM's (which I am using on a 32GB Mac machine): - Expand your current RAM in your Mac to at least 16GB or more

Re: Recommended specs for Windows Development computer.

2019-10-03 Thread JB via use-livecode
Do you have a link for info on how to do that? I will be wanting to test on Windows too and was thinking I needed to use a emulator like Parallels. JB > On Oct 3, 2019, at 10:54 AM, JJS via use-livecode > wrote: > > Why don't you create a dual boot of your mac? > > Apple itself supports it

Re: Recommended specs for Windows Development computer.

2019-10-03 Thread JJS via use-livecode
Why don't you create a dual boot of your mac? Apple itself supports it and delivers the drivers to do so. You only need a win10 license Op 3-10-2019 om 19:48 schreef Martin Koob via use-livecode: Hi I need to buy a new desktop PC to be used for LiveCode development including using the new

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Brian Milby via use-livecode
Part of the agreement that you make when you submit a PR is that you assign rights for the fixes to LC so the code can be integrated into the commercial versions.  You can’t mix the code on GitHub with the commercial versions yourself though. I have submitted stuff that is now in released

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Richmond via use-livecode
Aha: it's "Mr Mouth", late to the party, but well furnished with virtual whisky and raxin up tae an unco raj state. And, much against my inner inclinations I will put the following in English (although I have always viewed English as a cold, sterile language, while Scots speaks directly from

Recommended specs for Windows Development computer.

2019-10-03 Thread Martin Koob via use-livecode
Hi I need to buy a new desktop PC to be used for LiveCode development including using the new camera control and the player as I am working on a cross platform application for Mac and Windows. I have been developing the application on on a Mac to this point but need to have the PC for

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Erik Beugelaar via use-livecode
Does anyone know if you fork the Community Edition of LiveCode, solve bugs (e.g. IDE-related, plugins etc.), compile the LC version again and integrate it to the Indy version? Or is this just not possible because of the closed source of the engine? On 03/10/2019, 18:16, "use-livecode on

Re: Where LiveCode is Now

2019-10-03 Thread Mark Smith via use-livecode
Yes, most certainly agreed > On Oct 3, 2019, at 5:31 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode > wrote: > > For my part I love what you guys do. As I've mentioned before, Livecode has > upped my value to my employer, as they see that I am capable of more than > what they hider me to do. It may even

Re: Where LiveCode is Now

2019-10-03 Thread Phil Davis via use-livecode
Amen Bob! Phil Davis On 10/3/19 9:31 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: For my part I love what you guys do. As I've mentioned before, Livecode has upped my value to my employer, as they see that I am capable of more than what they hider me to do. It may even have been responsible for a

Re: Where LiveCode is Now

2019-10-03 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
For my part I love what you guys do. As I've mentioned before, Livecode has upped my value to my employer, as they see that I am capable of more than what they hider me to do. It may even have been responsible for a couple raises in the recent past. Also as I have mentioned before, I have

Where LiveCode is Now

2019-10-03 Thread Heather Laine via use-livecode
Dear List Folks, I'd like to reassure you, the team is anything but idle, and the fruits of their labours are coming your way. I don't wish to steal Pano's thunder, but you should look for an announcement on 9.0.5 tomorrow (all being well with the build, which is currently undergoing final

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode
On 10/3/19 8:47 AM, Trevor DeVore via use-livecode wrote: All true. But will the idle state of LC ever change again? I believe that it will if LiveCode FM gets traction. I may be wrong. Additionally, the patch that Mark Waddingham just implemented related to the frozen pool (I am the

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
I agree with Trevor here, but I'd like to interject a bit. I have 2 reasons I declined to use the Filemaker model many years ago. One was that I could not code procedurally. Coding was done using graphic objects whose properties you had to open and edit, then save. Easy I suppose for a

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Trevor DeVore via use-livecode
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 2:01 PM hh via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > Trevor D. wrote: > > If that is the case and they can build that revenue source > > then it should ultimately be a good thing for those of us > > who don't use LiveCode FM. It is unfortunate that LC has

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Trevor DeVore via use-livecode
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 4:56 AM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > I'm reading between the > lines but Trevor probably knows how well it's doing - but the rest of use > are being treated like mushrooms. > Hi Lagi, I do not have any additional information

HTML5

2019-10-03 Thread Alain Vezina via use-livecode
How come when I test my app in the developement test using my browser, everything is ok. and when I test the same app as standalone in my web site, nothing appear after 3 or 4 minutes? My standalone-commercial-9.0.2.js is 28.5 Mo. I guess that is the reason... Alain Vezina logilangue.com

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
The code looks like Pascal. Variable typing, declaration and scoping. Not english like. Perhaps you missed the whole point of Livecode, and it's predecessors Hypercard, Supercard and Metacard. Livecode is the alternative to environments like Lazarus, great for someone with the time (and

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Wow. I have the opposite experience. I think that t he LC Dev team is more responsive than any other I have ever experienced. I've been in IT for a really long time, and have dealt with a number of apps and dev environments. I've seen more feature developments in LC than all the rest combined.

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Dalton Calford via use-livecode
I first bought livecode back in 2010, they had lots of hype and promises at the time, most of the promises did not really start to arrive until the open source kickstarter (such as version control). I have tried to make sense of the code base, in order to add support for a few things, such as

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Lagi, taking Sherlock home is a bad idea. I took him home once. He started doing experiments on top of the kitchen table. The last straw was when he shot holes in the wall because he was bored. I said, "HOLMES! That's it! Get out now!" Bob S > On Oct 3, 2019, at 02:55 , Lagi Pittas via

Background Audio in Mobile Apps

2019-10-03 Thread Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode
One of my users says that a previous version of our app, as long is it remained open, continued to play audio, even when they went to another app.. "While I am listening audio’s in the Siva Siva app, new bug: Automatically stopping audio while screen off or moved one app to another app Or

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Dan Brown via use-livecode
I'm sure that LC HQ would have loved to solely preside over the language and a flourishing opensource and enterprise community that kept the lights on . Unfortunately that just hasn't happened since the kickstarter campaign. Without the LCFM lifeline I think they may have ceased to exist in the

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Mike Kerner via use-livecode
poor comms don't make this better. one good thing about LCG was that we had bi-monthly updates. this year, no comms. i am less hopeful that the influx of new revenue will matter in the medium term, because most of the effort will be on the requests that are tied to the new revenue. every time

Re: ...and Livecode... where are we now?

2019-10-03 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
Hi Tom, It doesn't take a Sherlock home to work out that if (I hope when!) LCFM works out that the company will have an influx of "new blood" with the attendant large increase in yearly subscriptions. My very short post (cut down from my usual rants) was lobbing a tiny hand grenade in to arena,

Re: Livecode unit test harness?

2019-10-03 Thread Ali Lloyd via use-livecode
Actually the exec-tests folder should probably be removed - that was our initial attempt at adding a test for each syntax variant while we were doing the refactoring project. They were translated at some point into the new test format at