Dear list members,
We are pleased to announce the release of LiveCode 9.6.2 RC-4.
Getting the Release
===
You can get the release at https://downloads.livecode.com/livecode/ or via
the automatic updater.
Release Contents
LiveCode 9.6.2 RC-4 comes with 1
Hi Sean,
I'm struggling a bit to understand how you intend to use this.
You give an example of
*if* field "Level" begins with "Director" and field "UserDisplay" is not
empty and field "UserDisplay" is not "All Agents" and the label of button
"Status" is "All Sales"*then*
*put*
FFS Alex,
I HAVE created a plugin! I was JUST trying to ask, can I insert a cr using
the replace field of the Find Replace ONLY.
I flipping already know how LC works for most other things. I dont need
explanations on how to suck effing eggs. Just answer the sodding question.
Answer nothing but
Hi all,
macOS 10.14.6, LC 9.6.2 rc4
Today i removed JAVA 9.x, installed JAVA 8
and "Android Studio.app" on my Mac.
then after hours of despair (why on earth must this be so difficult?)
I could tell LC where the SDk etc. were.
But only with the help of this forum thread and a Bernard, thank you
Hmmm I averaged about 3500. but every so often 7000+.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 12:17 PM Ralph DiMola via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Here's the first few from LC 9.6.1 Win 10 Pro VM SSD
>
> 1473
> 3326
> 3397
> 3155
> 2442
> 3234
> 2292
> 3349
> 3380
>
On 4/7/21 12:03 PM, Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode wrote:
The problems introduced were far more numerous than those "fixed."
A good compromise would be providing a checkbox in standalone settings where we can decide
whether we want to preserve local variables or not. If we don't care, the
It averages around 3850 and 3900 every time I try. However, when I try to run
the test 1 times the average goes down to just above 3600.
BigSur on Xeon W 3GHz.
Best regards
Tore Nilsen
> 7. apr. 2021 kl. 18:03 skrev Tom Glod via use-livecode
> :
>
> Hey peeps,
>
> I wanted to measure
Hi Panos,
> Am 07.04.2021 um 20:33 schrieb panagiotis merakos via use-livecode
> :
>
> Hello Klaus,
>
> Does your stack by any chance include a barcode scanner widget? I think you
> should follow the workaround described here:
>
> https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=22384
EX-ACTLY!
I closed everything down to make sure the core was being used as little as
possible.
It didn't make a difference in the counts or the variance I reported
earlier.
I guess its not important, but it sure is curious.
I think it means the engine is busy with something most of the time, and
once in a
I never built a non-mobile standalone for the first 5 years of using LC. For
a mobile build nothing gets closed and gets built from the stack(s) files on
disk. What a surprise I got when I built my first desktop standalone. I
initially thought that something was very wrong with the IDE and
tehe ;)
Thanks Curry - a bit of relief.
Sean
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 at 17:02, Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> Sean:
>
> > if there is a way of replacing using cr
> > in the find/replace panel of the script editor.
>
> So what you are REALLY asking is
Sean:
> if there is a way of replacing using cr
> in the find/replace panel of the script editor.
So what you are REALLY asking is whether nested style arrays and chained
behaviors can be used with tsNet and DataGrid in a git-compatible
environment to create an IDE within an IDE, via a
Hey peeps,
I wanted to measure how many times the LC engine can check the milliseconds
count during each millisecond that passes.
The results really surprised me, I thought it would be less, but I don't
know why really.
Anyone want to take a guess?
What is strange about my results, is that
I added an average. i7-6700 3.4GHz 8 cores in the VM
Run 1:
Max==>4586
Min==>460
Average==>3096.058
Run 2:
Max==>7573
Min==>460
Average==>3835.764743
Run 3:
Max==>7573
Min==>728
Average==>2947.388
Interesting
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
Hello Klaus,
Does your stack by any chance include a barcode scanner widget? I think you
should follow the workaround described here:
https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=22384
Regards,
Panos
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021, 20:18 Klaus major-k via use-livecode, <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>
Here's the first few from LC 9.6.1 Win 10 Pro VM SSD
1473
3326
3397
3155
2442
3234
2292
3349
3380
3275
3259
3498
3300
3634
3462
3228
3896
3762
3197
3186
2188
1461
2716
3358
2940
2886
2614
2264
3038
3322
3305
3372
3395
3418
2579
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
Jacqueline:
> It's not a bug, it was intentionally introduced to allow a couple
> of features, like retaining script local variables after a build.
> Given the amount of extra scripting to work around it for existing
> stacks, I think it may have introduced more problems than it tried
> to
I think I realized the problem will test to confirm. I think the Max is
actually what the avg should be. I think the writing to the variable is
what increases the time between those queries.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 12:58 PM Ralph DiMola via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
On 4/7/21 10:46 AM, Sean Cole (Pi) via use-livecode wrote:
I HAVE created a plugin! I was JUST trying to ask, can I insert a cr using
the replace field of the Find Replace ONLY.
I flipping already know how LC works for most other things. I dont need
explanations on how to suck effing eggs. Just
I scanned the results after it was done and got this:
Max==>3959
Min==>1015
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
Of Tom Glod via use-livecode
Ralph and Curry:
Fortunately, I took a break for a week before trying your solutions. For
someone who doesn’t do this every day, it is a confusing mess and I suppose
that somewhere there is an explanation in the help files of what to do, but my
cursory searches didn’t find anything for such a
Hi Lagi,
What unresponsiveness in windows 10 are you referring to?
the one that needs wait 0 with messages to avoid a frozen window?
I just reported what i think is a bug that has been there for years and
thats endless high cpu usage when using -ui flag . on WIndows 10 ...
and 7. I think.
I
+1
> On Apr 7, 2021, at 11:27 , J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> On 4/7/21 12:03 PM, Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode wrote:
>> The problems introduced were far more numerous than those "fixed."
>
> A good compromise would be providing a checkbox in standalone settings where
> we
On 4/7/2021 3:57 PM, Lagi Pittas via use-livecode wrote:
Unresponsive to me is typing 10 characters and seeing them appear one by
1 after I have finished typing , or waiting for 3 4 or more seconds
between each debugger step ..
I'm not saying you're not seeing an unacceptable slow down on
Hi
The unresponsiveness in Big Su is fixed and Ive only been asking for 3 or 4
years that the unresponsiveness in windows 10 (and probably 7)
is fixed.
I have a 10th generation core I7 with 16G of ram and it runs like molasses
- especially when using the debugger.
Ive tried EVERYTHING short of
I vote to ban.
Bob S
> On Apr 7, 2021, at 15:59 , Sean Cole (Pi) via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Jacque,
>
> That's all I needed to hear. As long as it is an absolute, definitive,
> knowledgeable 'no', I'm 'happy' to hear it. Sort of. I'd of course
> prefer it if there were a way, but
Lagi, I feel your pain, I do.
However, I only see a moderate amount of unresponsiveness and I can usually
put it down to the way I use it on Windoze in a VM on a Mac. The stack I am
working on at the moment takes 5 seconds to save on mac side but 30 seconds
on the Win10. My colleague running on a
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 at 19:27, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> A good compromise would be providing a checkbox in standalone settings
> where we can decide
> whether we want to preserve local variables or not. If we don't care, the
> SB should go ahead
>
This is a list of people reading and answering questions about LiveCode
programming. You might think my explanation of your typo was not
what you were looking for especially since I mentioned C and C++ in
the reply. But I personally answered the way I did for many reasons
and even told you to
On 07/04/2021 16:46, Sean Cole (Pi) via use-livecode wrote:
FFS Alex,
I HAVE created a plugin! I was JUST trying to ask, can I insert a cr using
the replace field of the Find Replace ONLY.
And now I have too. And I found that fun and interesting. Thank you for
triggering this interesting
I just DL LC 9.6.2 RC4 on a Windows VM running Server 2012R2. Saving is much
faster, although not quite up to speed with the Mac OS. Querying a database
however seems to be quite slow.
When running a tick counter on my MacOS I get this:
sites: 7
devices: 4
accessories: 6
service: 7
service: 6
Fair enough. You are no good for my BPD. You needn't even say NO. If you
don't have the answer, say nothing. You are not obliged to answer just
because you have the means.
Sean
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 at 23:09, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> On 07/04/2021
Excellent ... Yes the 1st one was usually the one that was the lowest for
me, for the reason you described.
But you also cleared up the mysterious big jumps,I too now get a consistent
result.
Thanks for chimming in
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:59 PM Niggemann, Bernd via use-livecode <
Thanks Jacque,
That's all I needed to hear. As long as it is an absolute, definitive,
knowledgeable 'no', I'm 'happy' to hear it. Sort of. I'd of course
prefer it if there were a way, but hey ho!
I make no apology for 'insulting' 'people' if they cannot read instructions
or get simple
Hi Tom
It is really interesting to see the results from this though. Tried it on
my various machines and got pretty much the same results as everyone else
consistently. It's amazing to see that in the region of 3000 loops occur in
the period of 1ms. which means we are perhaps getting 1 (lowish
Hi JB
So what I read from your message, appreciated as it is, that basically, you
hijacked my thread for your own intents and purposes of educating people
about things loosely related to my question but without actually answering
said question and without changing the subject to one that better
I tried this and got pretty constant results except for maybe the first ten
iterations. I figured if you just jump in with the milliseconds you would not
be at the "beginning" of the milliseconds and added a repeat loop to mitigate
that effect. Furthermore I appended the result to a variable.
Who, those who can't read simple instructions. I agree. ;)
Sean
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 00:10, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> I vote to ban.
>
> Bob S
>
>
> > On Apr 7, 2021, at 15:59 , Sean Cole (Pi) via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>
Nice to hear from you
Sean
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 02:02, John Balgenorth via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> GO SCREW YOURSELF!
>
> JB
>
> > On Apr 7, 2021, at 5:52 PM, Sean Cole (Pi) via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi JB
> > So what I
GO SCREW YOURSELF!
JB
> On Apr 7, 2021, at 5:52 PM, Sean Cole (Pi) via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Hi JB
> So what I read from your message, appreciated as it is, that basically, you
> hijacked my thread for your own intents and purposes of educating people
> about things loosely related to my
I hear you Sean ..it is pretty interesting These are like gritty
details about the engine, and I love learning them.
I did not expect less than a microsecond / operation, thats for sure.
There are a few other operations I would like to test in this way.
thanks for reminding me about the
On 4/7/21 9:38 PM, Tom Glod via use-livecode wrote:
I hear you Sean ..it is pretty interesting These are like gritty
details about the engine, and I love learning them.
I did not expect less than a microsecond / operation, thats for sure.
There are a few other operations I would like to
42 matches
Mail list logo
