Multiple revCursors substacks added to standalone

For a while now (LC 9.x) I have been finding that making a standalone sometimes adds multiple copies of revCursors to the standalone. One copy as a substack of the mainstack is expected, but under some unknown circumstances I get 3 more copies of the stack added (not as substacks). This on a

Re: Property sheets

I have uploaded version 2.2 of nsScriptDatabase which can display supported properties of widgets, with their current and default values. There are also some bug fixes so current users should download the new version and update their database for those stacks which contain widgets or for which

Re: Have we lost the Oracle driver?

I'm attempting to re-up this. I've been distracted by other issues, but now trying again to use the direct Oracle driver, rather than the ODBC one. I have confirmed that LiveCode is appropriately licensed ("professional" rather than "commercial"); and the standalone package contains

Re: Would anyone miss convertOctals?

Wait, I like octal! I admit I have not used it since writing a disassembler for the HP-85, which nobody but me ever used. I agree with Ralf - carrots would be just fine. .Jerry > On Jun 9, 2022, at 5:44 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode > wrote: > > So I'm currently sitting here about to

Re: Would anyone miss convertOctals?

Mark. Gong the other way, is your task made much simpler by losing “converOctals”? I assume so, or the issue would never have come up. Are there other similar language elements that also are on the block? Craig > On Jun 9, 2022, at 1:03 PM, Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode > wrote: > > 1)

Re: Would anyone miss convertOctals?

1) No (or didn't until I looked just now) 2) N/A 3) N/A 4) N/A On 09/06/2022 13:44, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: So I'm currently sitting here about to embark on fixing (which is the final thing to sort out before being able to

Re: Would anyone miss convertOctals?

Had to look it up, never used it. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 9, 2022, at 8:45 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode > wrote: > > So I'm currently sitting here about to embark on fixing > (which is the final > thing to sort out before

Re: Would anyone miss convertOctals?

Does it have something to do with eye surgery? Bob S > On Jun 9, 2022, at 05:44 , Mark Waddingham via use-livecode > wrote: > > So I'm currently sitting here about to embark on fixing > (which is the final > thing to sort out before

Re: Would anyone miss convertOctals?

On 6/9/22 05:44, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: So I'm currently sitting here about to embark on fixing (which is the final thing to sort out before being able to merge my constant expression patch) and I was reminded of

Re: Would anyone miss convertOctals?

On Jun 9, 2022, at 9:53 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>> wrote: On 2022-06-09 16:33, Devin Asay via use-livecode wrote: Wait, you said three questions. But no. What are those two hard problems of computer science again? ;) I forget, but I’ve

Re: Would anyone miss convertOctals?

On 2022-06-09 16:33, Devin Asay via use-livecode wrote: Wait, you said three questions. But no. What are those two hard problems of computer science again? ;) -- Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/ LiveCode: Everyone can create apps

Re: Would anyone miss convertOctals?

On Jun 9, 2022, at 6:44 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>> wrote: So I'm currently sitting here about to embark on fixing (which is the final thing to sort out before being able to merge my

Re: Would anyone miss convertOctals?

I have never used an octal. But it well might break legacy handlers of others, however simple it is to write a custom function to replicate. Craig > On Jun 9, 2022, at 10:37 AM, Paul Dupuis via use-livecode > wrote: > > Never use octal. pretty much any entries theses days are decimal or >

Re: Would anyone miss convertOctals?

On 09.06.22 14:44, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: So I'm currently sitting here about to embark on fixing (which is the final thing to sort out before being able to merge my constant expression patch) and I was reminded of

Re: Would anyone miss convertOctals?

Never use octal. pretty much any entries theses days are decimal or hexadecimal. Even binary (bit shifting or masks) is exceedingly rare On 6/9/2022 8:44 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: So I'm currently sitting here about to embark on fixing

Re: Would anyone miss convertOctals?

Hi Mark > On Jun 9, 2022, at 8:44 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode > wrote: > > So I'm currently sitting here about to embark on fixing > > (which is the final > thing to sort out

Re: Would anyone miss convertOctals?

> On 9 Jun 2022, at 1:44 pm, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode > wrote: > > So I'm currently sitting here about to embark on fixing > (which is the final > thing to sort out before being able to merge my constant expression patch) > and

Would anyone miss convertOctals?

So I'm currently sitting here about to embark on fixing (which is the final thing to sort out before being able to merge my constant expression patch) and I was reminded of 'convertOctals'. Now, generally, I am somewhat averse to actually

Re: LC 9.6.7 and Applescript

Hello Panos, I just installed LC 9.6.8 and everything works perfect. Thank you for your reply. I guess I should check https://quality.livecode.com more often :) Best, jbv Le 2022-06-09 04:17, panagiotis m via use-livecode a écrit : Hello jbv, This sounds like bug

Re: LC 9.6.7 and Applescript

This was fixed in 9.6.8 RC1 see bug report https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=23576 > Am 09.06.2022 um 09:37 schrieb jbv via use-livecode > : > > Hi list, > > I am trying to use an old stack made with LC 8.1 community that used to work > fine on Mac OSX 10.11. > Now I am with LC

Re: LC 9.6.7 and Applescript

Hello jbv, This sounds like bug https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=23576, which is fixed in LiveCode 9.6.8 rc1. Cheers, Panos -- On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 at 10:38, jbv via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Hi list, > > I am trying to use an old stack made with LC 8.1

LC 9.6.7 and Applescript

Hi list, I am trying to use an old stack made with LC 8.1 community that used to work fine on Mac OSX 10.11. Now I am with LC 9.6.7 on OSX 10.15. The stack features some AppleScript commands such as : tell application "Google Chrome" to set URL of active tab of window 1 to