On 6/16/13 8:07 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
So you want:
if there is an element "dog" in tAnimals["mammals"] then
Seems like a handy feature Jacque... you really will need to start playing with
the engine one of these days ;-)
You really don't want to be near me if I ever start learning C. :
On 17/06/2013, at 10:53 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> Pretty much, yes. I didn't ask my original question correctly. I want to see
> if a particular value is contained in any element at a certain level without
> looping through to check each one. Sort of like we can say "if tString
> contains "d
On 6/16/13 6:04 PM, dunb...@aol.com wrote:
I think what Jacque wanted was a more direct way to get the elements
at any level of a multi-dimensional array.
Pretty much, yes. I didn't ask my original question correctly. I want to
see if a particular value is contained in any element at a certain
I think others have answered this well. Essentially multidimensional arrays
are arrays with arrays as elements. x[a][b] = (x[a])[b]
However, you might be interested in this enhancement request:
Bug 6820 - Pass array element by reference
This would allow any level to be passed by reference to u
I think what Jacque wanted was a more direct way to get the elements at any
level of a multi-dimensional array. She certainly knows that, given:
on mouseUp
put "X" into myArray[a][b][c]
put "Y" into myArray[a][b][d]
put myArray[a][b] into newArray
end mouseUp
newArray gives:
c
I'm not sure to understand your question correctly.
if your array has four "first level" elements: myArray["a"]myArray["b"]
myArray["c"]myArray["d"]
and that e.g. myArray["c"] has three "second level" elements myArray["c"]["x"]
myArray["c"]["y"]myArray["c"]["z"]
which in turn
On Jun 16, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> You mean, like, on paper?
>
> :)
Well, I was under the impression that court filings have not yet entered the
digital age, and I thought that lawyers would be likely to print almost
everything for the official record. Unless I can now file for
Jacque.
You are asking for a function "the elements of key[yourKey]"
or
"the elements of key[yourKey1][yourkey2][yourKey3}"
This should be a feature request, like yesterday.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: J. Landman Gay
To: LiveCode Mailing List
Sent: Sun, Jun 16, 2013 3:27
On Jun 16, 2013, at 3:26 PM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote:
> >Suppose I only want to work with [c][x] and all its sub-dimensions. Is there
> >an efficient way to extract that into its own array without looping through
> >all the [c] keys?
Can you borrow b, work on it, then put it back? Like:
on m
I have a big array with lots of dimensions. Sometimes I need to work
with a "sub-dimension" only. For example:
array[a][b][c][d]
Each of those elements contains many other elements:
[c][x][y][z]
which each contain more elements:
[c][x][1][2][3]
Suppose I only want to work with [c][x] and a
On 6/15/13 4:22 PM, Howard Bornstein wrote:
The dictionary shows that the Find command is supported in IOS, but I can't
seem to make it work as described.
I want to "find" a string in a scrolling field and have the field scroll
automatically to that string. It works fine on the desktop but doesn
On 06/16/2013 05:13 PM, Ender Nafi wrote:
dave, tim and all my dear friends out there;
my sincere thanks to all of you...
i won't / can' t write long.
*last night, they emptied gezi park following erdogan's direct orders.
*the attack was brutal as always.
find the statements of claudia roth (g
I like the idea.
And I like the idea of how it can grow by explicit entries. Maybe that can
even be inferred; we can ask the NSA what people were looking for and what they
found. Uh, wait, I mean maybe all it takes is a click on a dictionary page
that says, this is what I have been recently l
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Jacques Hausser
wrote:
> Hy Mark,
>
> Thank you for the information. Useful stack ! But it fills my dreams
>only partially: it does not give the correct equivalent of "wrong-
>but-logical" commands like e.g. "fill field "XXX" with…". And as far
>as I can see, it do
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Peter M. Brigham wrote:
> Somewhat off-topic, but…. Given your target population of laptops
>that move around among various wireless networks you might be
>interested in these printing routines as well.
You mean, like, on paper?
:)
>I have a set of handlers that
dave, tim and all my dear friends out there;
my sincere thanks to all of you...
i won't / can' t write long.
*last night, they emptied gezi park following erdogan's direct orders.
*the attack was brutal as always.
find the statements of claudia roth (german green party), google it, youtube
it.
Ender,
please let us know if you and your family are OK.
I wish you all the best
Paolo
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Dave Kilroy2
wrote:
> Ender
>
> My family and I are also hoping you and yours are OK - we send you
> greetings
> and best wishes...
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in c
Somewhat off-topic, but…. Given your target population of laptops that move
around among various wireless networks you might be interested in these
printing routines as well. I have a set of handlers that will automatically set
the default printer to whatever printer is available, either by USB
Sorry about chiming it so late on this thread, but I got several days behind in
perusing the list. If you use the templatefield then you would first have to
set the properties of the templatefield to the properties of the field you are
using, right? Which brings us back to the thread about what
Hy Mark,
Thank you for the information. Useful stack ! But it fills my dreams only
partially: it does not give the correct equivalent of "wrong-but-logical"
commands like e.g. "fill field "XXX" with…". And as far as I can see, it
doesn't (yet ?) allow to extend a list of such "vrong-but-logical
Ender
My family and I are also hoping you and yours are OK - we send you greetings
and best wishes...
Dave
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/OT-What-s-happening-here-in-Turkey-tp4666044p4666539.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list arc
Hi Jacques,
BvG Docu provides full-text search. That should be pretty close to your
dream :-)
http://bjoernke.com/?target=bvgdocu
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogramm
Yes, that's a problem when intuition doesn't correspond to the index of the
dictionary… it would be interesting to develop a "maybe you're thinking of…"
algorithm for the dictionary ( without clogging the language with synonyms),
for example by redirecting toward "real" commands such searches a
Ender,
The news coming out of Instanbul doesn't sound good. If you are
able, please let us know if you are OK or not.
Tim Selander
Tokyo, Japan
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscri
Thank you much Jacques for this information. Very useful
Up to now, I was unlocking the size and position before moving the controls!
André
Le 16 juin 2013 à 00:13, Jacques Hausser a écrit :
> Dar,
>
> I'm almost sure you know all that already, and I'm not sure it's the most
> elegant way, bu
25 matches
Mail list logo
