I like yours better, Richard. Would you share your script with us?
thanks,
Roger
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
> So rather than require other people to design the LC menu bar to look how I
> personally prefer it, I just made a short script
Roger Guay wrote:
I like yours better, Richard. Would you share your script with us?
Sure. It's a checkbox in my
soon-to-be-released-once-I-finish-compatibility-with-v8 devolution
toolkit - here's the script:
on UbuntifyRevMenubar
put the defaultStack into tSaveDS
set the
One of the great attributes of LiveCode is as the ide is written in LiveCode,
it's really easy to hack.
So changing the colour of the menu bar is a simple one liner.
Set the backgroundColor of stack "revMenubar" to mycolor
-
Andy Piddock
My software never has bugs. It just develops
Sorry that was a typo just on the eMail !
The stack has a size of 1024*768 pixels.
@ Richmond this size is suggested on a movie about Resolution Independence:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idctzDFoGj8=youtu.be
I think that that Colin could be correct with his suggestion of using:
I am pleased to announce a free update for ChartMaker for LiveCode. This
release also includes improvements made in internal Build 66.
LiveCode 8: ChartMaker should be entirely LC8-compatible. If you experience
any problems, please report issues so they can be addressed.
Full release notes and
On 8.02.2016 09:54, Peter TB Brett wrote:
On 08/02/2016 06:31, RM wrote:
Are these to become the standard revMenuBar button icons, or is this a
blip?
Yes, this is the new LiveCode 8 icon theme! We're really pleased with
it. The new icons make it much clearer what each menu bar item
On Monday, February 8, 2016, RM wrote:
>
>
> Could everybody who cares about this sort of thing indicate whether they
> prefer the coloured icons
> or the black ones?
>
Black ones.
--
Trevor DeVore
___
use-livecode
The background color tooltips is white in DP14, used to a yellow color. Is
this another result of theming?
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
Is that the maximum theoretical value? The actual connections per second
would depend on the size of the data and how much processing it needs,
right?
Also, what is Livecode Application Server?
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Pierre Sahores
wrote:
> Hi Livecoders,
>
>
> Le 9 févr. 2016 à 01:27, Richard Gaskin a écrit :
>
> Pierre Sahores wrote:
>
> > Story made short : Appart the amazing Lua platform (preferably set as
> > an Openresty one), well configured LC application’s servers still
> > outperforms anything available around
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
>
> Democracy is useful for many things, but I'm not sure UI is among them.
> In fact, I'd argue squarely against it for several reasons:
>
> How many in our audience are specialists in UI design?
>
> IMO this has
Last month I asked:
Colin Holgate wrote:
> Being letterboxed isn’t a quality issue, it isn’t even bad. It’s just
> that Apple would reject the app.
On what grounds?
If there was an answer I missed it, but it seems Apple prefers that
users get the full benefit of their screen size.
A
My login to the forum seems not to be working, otherwise I would post a reply.
From the information, it seems like it’s a Portrait app. I think Apple’s
response is incorrect, and that trying to appeal to them might be successful.
There’s a difference between what I was talking about, where you
RM wrote:
> ?
>
> Are these to become the standard revMenuBar button icons, or is this
> a blip?
I'm glad it's happened, and v8 is the right time for this to happen.
The shift to monochrome icons has been a pervasive trend across the UI
world for some years now, and I rather like how it
"This is one of those areas where meritocracy trumps democracy"
In 1982 at Citibank we created a worldwide information product that had
news/weather/stock prices/Commodity prices/FX rates(sound familiar?). We had
many meeting on the UI and democracy determined that the various commands
should use
Nevermind
2016-02-08 14:18 GMT+02:00 Trevor DeVore :
> On Monday, February 8, 2016, RM wrote:
> >
> >
> > Could everybody who cares about this sort of thing indicate whether they
> > prefer the coloured icons
> > or the black ones?
> >
>
>
Hi all,
Read about new developments in LiveCode open source and the open source
community in today's edition of the "This Week in LiveCode" newsletter!
Read issue #19 here: https://goo.gl/SjgS1d
This is a weekly newsletter about LiveCode, focussing on what's been
going on in and around
black, lightgray, darkgray, white, red , yellow, blue and "102,255,204" :-)
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
I tried the same thing with a remote URL to an mp4 video file. Same result
it plays in the IDE but not in HTML5.
I checked your bug report http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16870
and see that the response from Peter Brett that 'Player support has not yet
been implemented in the HTML5
The dictionary says what the two properties are for, but they are slightly
confusing. I would start by trying iphoneUseDeviceResolution true.
I think that exactFit will be the least used full screen mode. It would distort
your card to match the ratio of the device. Your choices are to either
Do you mean "I don't have a preference" or something else?
Richmond.
On 8.02.2016 15:29, Antti Ilola wrote:
Nevermind
2016-02-08 14:18 GMT+02:00 Trevor DeVore :
On Monday, February 8, 2016, RM wrote:
Could everybody who cares about
A hint or sarcasm there, methinks . . .
Richmond.
On 8.02.2016 15:37, [-hh] wrote:
black, lightgray, darkgray, white, red , yellow, blue and "102,255,204" :-)
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to
On 8.02.2016 17:24, Ralph DiMola wrote:
"This is one of those areas where meritocracy trumps democracy"
In 1982 at Citibank we created a worldwide information product that had
news/weather/stock prices/Commodity prices/FX rates(sound familiar?). We had
many meeting on the UI and democracy
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 2:26 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
> Devin Asay wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me the first version of LC where script-only stacks
> > appeared? Was it one of the v. 8 DPs?
>
> It was sometime in the v6.7 series, maybe 6.7.4?
That’s my recollection
The label text of the menu buttons actually does go bold, but it seems to
be an unfortunate feature of the system font on OSX (Yosemite onwards) that
it either changes imperceptibly or not at all when bolded. I have noted it
as something we should deal with.
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 1:58 PM, Ali Lloyd wrote:
>
> The label text of the menu buttons actually does go bold, but it seems to
> be an unfortunate feature of the system font on OSX (Yosemite onwards) that
> it either changes imperceptibly or not at all when bolded. I have
Can anyone tell me the first version of LC where script-only stacks appeared?
Was it one of the v. 8 DPs?
Devin
Devin Asay
Office of Digital Humanities
Brigham Young University
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit
Devin Asay wrote:
> Can anyone tell me the first version of LC where script-only stacks
> appeared? Was it one of the v. 8 DPs?
It was sometime in the v6.7 series, maybe 6.7.4?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
On 8.02.2016 17:11, Richard Gaskin wrote:
RM wrote:
> ?
>
> Are these to become the standard revMenuBar button icons, or is this
> a blip?
I'm glad it's happened, and v8 is the right time for this to happen.
The shift to monochrome icons has been a pervasive trend across the UI
world
You are always so kind. Thank you.
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
>
> Sure. It's a checkbox in my
> soon-to-be-released-once-I-finish-compatibility-with-v8 devolution toolkit -
> here's the script:
An interesting fact about the new, black icons, is not that they are black,
but that they are NOT the previous coloured icons rendered in black,
but entirely new designs (generally larger), and a lot of them have new
names.
Richmond.
___
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 12:54 AM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
> On 08/02/2016 06:31, RM wrote:
>
>> Are these to become the standard revMenuBar button icons, or is this a
>> blip?
>
> Yes, this is the new LiveCode 8 icon theme! We're really pleased with it.
> The new
Richard, you can make that 4! But i've always been a fan of dark themes.
I like the monotone icons but agree with Devin that the active state needs
to be more pronounced, maybe a subtle colour overlay on the button?
-
Andy Piddock
My software never has bugs. It just develops random
On 2/8/2016 1:01 PM, Devin Asay wrote:
RECOMMENDATION: At the very minimum, I would like to see the bolded
icon label restored, and ideally another visual cue added to really
shout to the user, “Hey, you’re in a special mode now! Pay attention
because things will work a little differently until
Almost inevitably, I shall be spending a spot of time working on a
"hack stack" so that end-users can
change the revMenuBar icons to a variety of possibilities ;-)
http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=9=26506=137728#p137728
I did warn you!
Love, Richmond.
Roger Guay wrote:
>> On Feb 8, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>>
>> Sure. It's a checkbox in my soon-to-be-released-once-I-finish-
>> compatibility-with-v8 devolution toolkit - here's the script:
>
> You are always so kind. Thank you.
Thank, Roger. I'm jut tickled someone else finds
On 02/08/2016 11:25 AM, AndyP wrote:
Richard, you can make that 4! But i've always been a fan of dark themes.
I like the monotone icons but agree with Devin that the active state needs
to be more pronounced, maybe a subtle colour overlay on the button?
I'm not fond of the overly macho
I'm seeing what I think is a related issue in the Script Editor. Not sure
what font was used in the SE tabs prior to 8 DP14 but it was noticeably
bold on the active tab. In DP14, the bold is hardly noticeable so I'm
guessing it's using the system font and this is the same issue as with the
Or possibly 6.6.4.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:10 PM Ali Lloyd wrote:
> It was 6.7 GM, I believe.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:15 PM Devin Asay wrote:
>
>> Can anyone tell me the first version of LC where script-only stacks
>> appeared? Was it one of
On 02/08/2016 02:12 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
What happened to the keyboard accessibility? No contextual menus, no way
to option-cmd-click an object to open the script. No keyboard shortcuts
to open card or stack scripts. I rely on those constantly.
Yeah, that one caught me too. Delete your
On 2/8/2016 4:27 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
On 02/08/2016 02:12 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
What happened to the keyboard accessibility? No contextual menus, no way
to option-cmd-click an object to open the script. No keyboard shortcuts
to open card or stack scripts. I rely on those constantly.
The app browser is in the plugins menu.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:38 PM Ali Lloyd wrote:
> None of these have been changed in LC 8 as far as I know - Cmd + E and
> Alt + Cmd + click reliably open the script editor for the selected and
> clicked object respectively for
None of these have been changed in LC 8 as far as I know - Cmd + E and
Alt + Cmd + click reliably open the script editor for the selected and
clicked object respectively for me. I presume you are on OSX?
What keyboard shortcuts open the card / stack script? How are you trying to
open a contextual
It was 6.7 GM, I believe.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:15 PM Devin Asay wrote:
> Can anyone tell me the first version of LC where script-only stacks
> appeared? Was it one of the v. 8 DPs?
>
> Devin
>
>
> Devin Asay
> Office of Digital Humanities
> Brigham Young University
>
>
On 2/8/2016 4:27 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Yeah, that one caught me too. Delete your preference file to get the
contextual menus and stuff back again. The upgrade path from earlier
versions really needs more thought before this is ready for prime time.
Didn't work.
How do you get the app
What happened to the keyboard accessibility? No contextual menus, no way
to option-cmd-click an object to open the script. No keyboard shortcuts
to open card or stack scripts. I rely on those constantly.
I am trying LC 8 again after an initial trial several versions ago where
it wasn't
Oops sorry, I seem to be delayed! Yes, it only appeared as a menu item in
8.0 DP 6
https://github.com/livecode/livecode-ide/commit/5cf30024
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:15 PM Ali Lloyd wrote:
> Or possibly 6.6.4.
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:10 PM Ali Lloyd
Hi Livecoders,
Story made short : Appart the amazing Lua platform (preferably set as an
Openresty one), well configured LC application’s servers still outperforms
anything available around (Websphere, Tomcat, PHP5/7, Perl5, NodeJS, Go,
Python, RoR,…). In-between, LC application’s server is 60
Pierre Sahores wrote:
> Story made short : Appart the amazing Lua platform (preferably set as
> an Openresty one), well configured LC application’s servers still
> outperforms anything available around (Websphere, Tomcat, PHP5/7,
> Perl5, NodeJS, Go, Python, RoR,…). In-between, LC application’s
49 matches
Mail list logo